Add generic costs calculation for SADDSAT/SSUBSAT intrinsics, this uses generic costs for sadd_with_overflow/ssub_with_overflow, an extra sign comparison + a selects based on the sign/overflow.
This completes PR40316
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57239
llvm-svn: 352315
This fixes loads like 's1 = load %p (load 1 from %p)' being combined with an
extend into an illegal 's8 = g_extload %p (load 1 from %p)' which doesn't do any
extension, by avoiding touching those < s8 size loads.
This bug was uncovered by a verifier update r351584, which I reverted it to keep
the bots green.
llvm-svn: 352311
The add+and sequence followed by a branch can
happen e.g. when looping over the set bits of an integer:
```
while (x != 0) {
func(x & ~x);
x &= x - 1;
}
```
Reviewed By: ctopper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57296
llvm-svn: 352306
def32 here means the producing instruction zeroed bits 63:32. We already do this for zext, but it looks like we can get an and+anyext sometimes.
Spotted in the diffs from D33587.
llvm-svn: 352303
Bitcast and certain Ptr2Int/Int2Ptr instructions will not alter the
value of their operand and can therefore be looked through when we
determine non-nullness.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54956
llvm-svn: 352293
Fix issue noted in D57281 that only tested the one use for the SDValue (the result flag), not the entire SUB.
I've added the getNode() to make it clearer what is intended than just the -> redirection.
llvm-svn: 352291
As discussed on PR24545, we should try to commute X86::COND_A 'icmp ugt' cases to X86::COND_B 'icmp ult' to more optimally bind the carry flag output to a SBB instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57281
llvm-svn: 352289
We often generate X86ISD::SBB(X, 0) for carry flag arithmetic.
I had tried to create test cases for the ADC equivalent (which often uses the same pattern) but haven't managed to find anything yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57169
llvm-svn: 352288
This reduces a bit of duplication between the combining and
lowering places that use it, but the primary motivation is
to make it easier to rearrange the lowering logic and solve
PR40434:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40434
llvm-svn: 352280
The IR enforced limit for the address space is 24-bits, but LLT was
only using 23-bits. Additionally, the argument to the constructor was
truncating to 16-bits.
A similar problem still exists for the number of vector elements. The
IR enforces no limit, so if you try to use a vector with > 65535
elements the IRTranslator asserts in the LLT constructor.
llvm-svn: 352264
For the power9 CPU, vector operations consume a pair of execution units rather
than one execution unit like a scalar operation. Update the target transform
cost functions to reflect the higher cost of vector operations when targeting
Power9.
Patch by RolandF.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55461
llvm-svn: 352261
Summary: We have isel patterns for this, but we're missing some load patterns and all broadcast patterns. A DAG combine seems like a better fit for this.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56971
llvm-svn: 352260
These intrinsics may return different values every time they are called
and should not be CSE'd. IntrInaccessibleMemOnly appears to be the right
attribute to model this behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57259
llvm-svn: 352256
Summary:
I'm not sure why we were using SEXTLOAD. EXTLOAD seems more appropriate since we don't care about the upper bits.
This patch changes this and then modifies the X86 post legalization combine to emit a extending shuffle instead of a sign_extend_vector_inreg. Could maybe use an any_extend_vector_inreg, but I just did what we already do in LowerLoad. I think we can actually get rid of this code entirely if we switch to -x86-experimental-vector-widening-legalization.
On AVX512 targets I think we might be able to use a masked vpmovzx and not have to expand this at all.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57186
llvm-svn: 352255
With the fixes to the building of LLVM-C.dll in D56781 this should now
be safe to land. This will greatly simplify dealing with LLVM for people
that just want to use the C API on windows. This is a follow up from
D35077.
Patch by Jakob Bornecrantz!
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56774
llvm-svn: 352250
DAGCombiner::visitBITCAST will perform:
fold (bitconvert (fneg x)) -> (xor (bitconvert x), signbit)
fold (bitconvert (fabs x)) -> (and (bitconvert x), (not signbit))
As shown in double-bitmanip-dagcombines.ll, this can be advantageous. But
RV32FD doesn't use bitcast directly (as i64 isn't a legal type), and instead
uses RISCVISD::SplitF64. This patch adds an equivalent DAG combine for
SplitF64.
llvm-svn: 352247
Summary:
Currently, if an instruction with a memory operand has no debug information,
X86DiscriminateMemOps will generate one based on the first line of the
enclosing function, or the last seen debug info.
This may cause confusion in certain debugging scenarios. The long term
approach would be to use the line number '0' in such cases, however, that
brings in challenges: the base discriminator value range is limited
(4096 values).
For the short term, adding an opt-in flag for this feature.
See bug 40319 (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40319)
Reviewers: dblaikie, jmorse, gbedwell
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: aprantl, eraman, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57257
llvm-svn: 352246
(fcopysign a, (fneg b)) will be expanded to bitwise operations by
DAGTypeLegalizer::SoftenFloatRes_FCOPYSIGN if the floating point type isn't
legal. Arguably it might be worth doing a combine even if it is legal.
llvm-svn: 352240
Summary:
Set default value for retrieved attributes to 1, since the check is against 1.
Eliminates the warning noise generated when the attributes are not present.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: jlebar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57253
llvm-svn: 352238
