Since mem2reg isn't run at -O0, we get a ton of reloads from the stack,
for example, before, this code:
int foo(int x, int y, int z) {
return x+y+z;
}
used to compile into:
_foo: ## @foo
subq $12, %rsp
movl %edi, 8(%rsp)
movl %esi, 4(%rsp)
movl %edx, (%rsp)
movl 8(%rsp), %edx
movl 4(%rsp), %esi
addl %edx, %esi
movl (%rsp), %edx
addl %esi, %edx
movl %edx, %eax
addq $12, %rsp
ret
Now we produce:
_foo: ## @foo
subq $12, %rsp
movl %edi, 8(%rsp)
movl %esi, 4(%rsp)
movl %edx, (%rsp)
movl 8(%rsp), %edx
addl 4(%rsp), %edx ## Folded load
addl (%rsp), %edx ## Folded load
movl %edx, %eax
addq $12, %rsp
ret
Fewer instructions and less register use = faster compiles.
llvm-svn: 113102
"For ARM stack frames that utilize variable sized objects and have either
large local stack areas or require dynamic stack realignment, allocate a
base register via which to access the local frame. This allows efficient
access to frame indices not accessible via the FP (either due to being out
of range or due to dynamic realignment) or the SP (due to variable sized
object allocation). In particular, this greatly improves efficiency of access
to spill slots in Thumb functions which contain VLAs."
r112986 fixed a latent bug exposed by the above.
llvm-svn: 112989
vabd intrinsic and add and/or zext operations. In the case of vaba, this
also avoids the need for a DAG combine pattern to combine vabd with add.
Update tests. Auto-upgrade the old intrinsics.
llvm-svn: 112941
large local stack areas or require dynamic stack realignment, allocate a
base register via which to access the local frame. This allows efficient
access to frame indices not accessible via the FP (either due to being out
of range or due to dynamic realignment) or the SP (due to variable sized
object allocation). In particular, this greatly improves efficiency of access
to spill slots in Thumb functions which contain VLAs.
rdar://7352504
rdar://8374540
rdar://8355680
llvm-svn: 112883
there are clearly no stores between the load and the store. This fixes
this miscompile reported as PR7833.
This breaks the test/CodeGen/X86/narrow_op-2.ll optimization, which is
safe, but awkward to prove safe. Move it to X86's README.txt.
llvm-svn: 112861
add, and subtract operations with zero-extended or sign-extended vectors.
Update tests. Add auto-upgrade support for the old intrinsics.
llvm-svn: 112773
check more strict, breaking some cases not checked in the
testsuite, but also exposes some foldings not done before,
as this example:
movaps (%rdi), %xmm0
movaps (%rax), %xmm1
movaps %xmm0, %xmm2
movss %xmm1, %xmm2
shufps $36, %xmm2, %xmm0
now is generated as:
movaps (%rdi), %xmm0
movaps %xmm0, %xmm1
movlps (%rax), %xmm1
shufps $36, %xmm1, %xmm0
llvm-svn: 112753
int x(int t) {
if (t & 256)
return -26;
return 0;
}
We generate this:
tst.w r0, #256
mvn r0, #25
it eq
moveq r0, #0
while gcc generates this:
ands r0, r0, #256
it ne
mvnne r0, #25
bx lr
Scandalous really!
During ISel time, we can look for this particular pattern. One where we have a
"MOVCC" that uses the flag off of a CMPZ that itself is comparing an AND
instruction to 0. Something like this (greatly simplified):
%r0 = ISD::AND ...
ARMISD::CMPZ %r0, 0 @ sets [CPSR]
%r0 = ARMISD::MOVCC 0, -26 @ reads [CPSR]
All we have to do is convert the "ISD::AND" into an "ARM::ANDS" that sets [CPSR]
when it's zero. The zero value will all ready be in the %r0 register and we only
need to change it if the AND wasn't zero. Easy!
llvm-svn: 112664
1) nuke ConstDataCoalSection, which is dead.
2) revise my previous patch for rdar://8018335,
which was completely wrong. Specifically, it doesn't
make sense to mark __TEXT,__const_coal as PURE_INSTRUCTIONS,
because it is for readonly data. templates (it turns out)
go to const_coal_nt. The real fix for rdar://8018335 was
to give ConstTextCoalSection a section kind of ReadOnly
instead of Text.
llvm-svn: 112496
when the top elements of a vector are undefined. This happens all
the time for X86-64 ABI stuff because only the low 2 elements of
a 4 element vector are defined. For example, on:
_Complex float f32(_Complex float A, _Complex float B) {
return A+B;
}
We used to produce (with SSE2, SSE4.1+ uses insertps):
_f32: ## @f32
movdqa %xmm0, %xmm2
addss %xmm1, %xmm2
pshufd $16, %xmm2, %xmm2
pshufd $1, %xmm1, %xmm1
pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm0
addss %xmm1, %xmm0
pshufd $16, %xmm0, %xmm1
movdqa %xmm2, %xmm0
unpcklps %xmm1, %xmm0
ret
We now produce:
_f32: ## @f32
movdqa %xmm0, %xmm2
addss %xmm1, %xmm2
pshufd $1, %xmm1, %xmm1
pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm3
addss %xmm1, %xmm3
movaps %xmm2, %xmm0
unpcklps %xmm3, %xmm0
ret
This implements rdar://8368414
llvm-svn: 112378
all the other LDM/STM instructions. This fixes asm printer crashes when
compiling with -O0. I've changed one of the NEON tests (vst3.ll) to run
with -O0 to check this in the future.
Prior to this change VLDM/VSTM used addressing mode #5, but not really.
The offset field was used to hold a count of the number of registers being
loaded or stored, and the AM5 opcode field was expanded to specify the IA
or DB mode, instead of the standard ADD/SUB specifier. Much of the backend
was not aware of these special cases. The crashes occured when rewriting
a frameindex caused the AM5 offset field to be changed so that it did not
have a valid submode. I don't know exactly what changed to expose this now.
Maybe we've never done much with -O0 and NEON. Regardless, there's no longer
any reason to keep a count of the VLDM/VSTM registers, so we can use
addressing mode #4 and clean things up in a lot of places.
llvm-svn: 112322
