These extra vcvt instructions were missed from 74ca67c109 because they
live in a different Domain, but should be treated in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83204
As far as I can tell, it should not be necessary for VCTP to be
unpredictable in tail predicated loops. Either it has a a valid loop
counter as a operand which will naturally keep it in the right loop, or
it doesn't and it won't be converted to a tail predicated loop. Not
marking it as having side effects allows it to be scheduled more cleanly
for cases where it is not expected to become a tail predicate loop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83907
There were cases where a do-while loop would be converted to a while
loop before finding out that it would be unsafe to expand the SCEV in
this situation and then bailing out of hardware loop conversion.
This patch checks if it would be unsafe to expand the SCEV and if so stops converting the do-while into a while, allowing conversion to a hardware loop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83953
In an upcoming AMDGPU patch, the scalar cases will be legal and vector
ops should be scalarized, rather than producing a long sequence of
vector ops which will also need to be scalarized.
Use a lazy heuristic that seems to work and improves the thumb2 MVE
test.
Vector bitwise selects are matched by pseudo VBSP instruction
and expanded to VBSL/VBIT/VBIF after register allocation
depend on operands registers to minimize extra copies.
This adds a peephole optimisation to turn a t2MOVccr that could not be
folded into any other instruction into a CSEL on 8.1-m. The t2MOVccr
would usually be expanded into a conditional mov, that becomes an IT;
MOV pair. We can instead generate a CSEL instruction, which can
potentially be smaller and allows better register allocation freedom,
which can help reduce codesize. Performance is more variable and may
depend on the micrarchitecture details, but initial results look good.
If we need to control this per-cpu, we can add a subtarget feature as we
need it.
Original patch by David Penry.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83566
This refactors option -disable-mve-tail-predication to take different arguments
so that we have 1 option to control tail-predication rather than several
different ones.
This is also a prep step for D82953, in which we want to reject reductions
unless that is requested with this option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83133
Whether an instruction is deemed to have side effects in determined by
whether it has a tblgen pattern that emits a single instruction.
Because of the way a lot of the the vcvt instructions are specified
either in dagtodag code or with patterns that emit multiple
instructions, they don't get marked as not having side effects.
This just marks them as not having side effects manually. It can help
especially with instruction scheduling, to not create artificial
barriers, but one of these tests also managed to produce fewer
instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81639
Given a loop with two subloops, it should be possible for both to be
converted to hardware loops. That's what this patch does, simply enough.
It slightly alters the loop iterating order to try and convert all
subloops. If one (or more) succeeds, it stops as before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78502
Move the Thumb2SizeReduce pass to before IfConversion when optimising
for minimal code size.
Running the Thumb2SizeReduction pass before IfConversionallows T1
instructions to propagate to the final output, rather than the
ifConverter modifying T2 instructions and preventing them from being
reduced later.
This change does introduce a regression regarding execution time, so
it's only applied when optimising for size.
Running the LLVM Test Suite with this change produces a geomean
difference of -0.1% for the size..text metric.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82439
While validating live-out values, record instructions that look like
a reduction. This will comprise of a vector op (for now only vadd),
a vorr (vmov) which store the previous value of vadd and then a vpsel
in the exit block which is predicated upon a vctp. This vctp will
combine the last two iterations using the vmov and vadd into a vector
which can then be consumed by a vaddv.
Once we have determined that it's safe to perform tail-predication,
we need to change this sequence of instructions so that the
predication doesn't produce incorrect code. This involves changing
the register allocation of the vadd so it updates itself and the
predication on the final iteration will not update the falsely
predicated lanes. This mimics what the vmov, vctp and vpsel do and
so we then don't need any of those instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75533
After the rewrite of this pass (D79175) I missed one thing: the inserted VCTP
intrinsic can be cloned to exit blocks if there are instructions present in it
that perform the same operation, but this wasn't triggering anymore. However,
it turns out that for handling reductions, see D75533, it's actually easier not
not to have the VCTP in exit blocks, so this removes that code.
This was possible because it turned out that some other code that depended on
this, rematerialization of the trip count enabling more dead code removal
later, wasn't doing much anymore due to more aggressive dead code removal that
was added to the low-overhead loops pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82773
This patch stops the trunc, rint, round, floor and ceil intrinsics from blocking tail predication.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82553
MVE has native reductions for integer add and min/max. The others need
to be expanded to a series of extract's and scalar operators to reduce
the vector into a single scalar. The default codegen for that expands
the reduction into a series of in-order operations.
This modifies that to something more suitable for MVE. The basic idea is
to use vector operations until there are 4 remaining items then switch
to pairwise operations. For example a v8f16 fadd reduction would become:
Y = VREV X
Z = ADD(X, Y)
z0 = Z[0] + Z[1]
z1 = Z[2] + Z[3]
return z0 + z1
The awkwardness (there is always some) comes in from something like a
v4f16, which is first legalized by adding identity values to the extra
lanes of the reduction, and which can then not be optimized away through
the vrev; fadd combo, the inserts remain. I've made sure they custom
lower so that we can produce the pairwise additions before the extra
values are added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81397
Similar to the recent patch for fpext, this adds vcvtb and vcvtt with
insert into vector instruction selection patterns for fptruncs. This
helps clear up a lot of register shuffling that we would otherwise do.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81637
We current extract and convert from a top lane of a f16 vector using a
VMOVX;VCVTB pair. We can simplify that to use a single VCVTT. The
pattern is mostly copied from a vector extract pattern, but produces a
VCVTTHS f32 directly.
This had to move some code around so that ARMInstrVFP had access to the
required pattern frags that were previously part of ARMInstrNEON.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81556
This lowers intrinsic @llvm.get.active.lane.mask to a setcc node, i.e. an icmp
ule, and creates vectors for its 2 arguments on which the comparison is
performed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82292
This extends PerformSplittingToWideningLoad to also handle FP_Ext, as
well as sign and zero extends. It uses an integer extending load
followed by a VCVTL on the bottom lanes to efficiently perform an fpext
on a smaller than legal type.
The existing code had to be rewritten a little to not just split the
node in two and let legalization handle it from there, but to actually
split into legal chunks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81340
This adds code to lower f16 to f32 fp_exts's using an MVE VCVT
instructions, similar to a recent similar patch for fp_trunc. Again it
goes through the lowering of a BUILD_VECTOR, but is slightly simpler
only having to deal with interleaved indices. It adds a VCVTL node to
lower to, similar to VCVTN.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81339
This splits MVE vector stores of a fp_trunc in the same way that we do
for standard trunc's. It extends PerformSplittingToNarrowingStores to
handle fp_round, splitting the store into pieces and adding a VCVTNb to
perform the actual fp_round. The actual store is then converted to an
integer store so that it can truncate bottom lanes of the result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81141
This adds code to lower f32 to f16 fp_trunc's using a pair of MVE VCVT
instructions. Due to v4f16 not being legal, fp_round are often split up
fairly early. So this reconstructs the vcvt's from a buildvector of
fp_rounds from two vector inputs. Something like:
BUILDVECTOR(FP_ROUND(EXTRACT_ELT(X, 0),
FP_ROUND(EXTRACT_ELT(Y, 0),
FP_ROUND(EXTRACT_ELT(X, 1),
FP_ROUND(EXTRACT_ELT(Y, 1), ...)
It adds a VCVTN node to handle this, which like VMOVN or VQMOVN lowers
into the top/bottom lanes of an MVE instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81139
LDRD and STRD along with UBFX and SBFX are selected from DAGToDAG
transforms, so do not have tblgen patterns. They don't get marked as
having side effects so cannot be scheduled as efficiently as you would
like.
This specifically marks then as not having side effects.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82358
Summary:
Half-precision floating point arguments and returns are currently
promoted to either float or int32 in clang's CodeGen and there's
no existing support for the lowering of `half` arguments and returns
from IR in AArch32's backend.
Such frontend coercions, implemented as coercion through memory
in clang, can cause a series of issues in argument lowering, as causing
arguments to be stored on the wrong bits on big-endian architectures
and incurring in missing overflow detections in the return of certain
functions.
This patch introduces the handling of half-precision arguments and returns in
the backend using the actual "half" type on the IR. Using the "half"
type the backend is able to properly enforce the AAPCS' directions for
those arguments, making sure they are stored on the proper bits of the
registers and performing the necessary floating point convertions.
Reviewers: rjmccall, olista01, asl, efriedma, ostannard, SjoerdMeijer
Reviewed By: ostannard
Subscribers: stuij, hiraditya, dmgreen, llvm-commits, chill, dnsampaio, danielkiss, kristof.beyls, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75169
To set up a tail-predicated loop, we need to to calculate the number of
elements processed by the loop. We can now use intrinsic
@llvm.get.active.lane.mask() to do this, which is emitted by the vectoriser in
D79100. This intrinsic generates a predicate for the masked loads/stores, and
consumes the Backedge Taken Count (BTC) as its second argument. We can now use
that to reconstruct the loop tripcount, instead of the IR pattern match
approach we were using before.
Many thanks to Eli Friedman and Sam Parker for all their help with this work.
This also adds overflow checks for the different, new expressions that we
create: the loop tripcount, and the sub expression that calculates the
remaining elements to be processed. For the latter, SCEV is not able to
calculate precise enough bounds, so we work around that at the moment, but is
not entirely correct yet, it's conservative. The overflow checks can be
overruled with a force flag, which is thus potentially unsafe (but not really
because the vectoriser is the only place where this intrinsic is emitted at the
moment). It's also good to mention that the tail-predication pass is not yet
enabled by default. We will follow up to see if we can implement these
overflow checks better, either by a change in SCEV or we may want revise the
definition of llvm.get.active.lane.mask.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79175
In more complicated loops we can easily hit the complexity limits of
loop strength reduction. If we do and filtering occurs, it's all too
easy to remove the wrong formulae for post-inc preferring accesses due
to it attempting to maximise register re-use. The patch adds an
alternative filtering step when the target is preferring postinc to pick
postinc formulae instead, hopefully lowering the complexity to below the
limit so that aggressive filtering is not needed.
There is also a change in here to stop considering existing addrecs as
free under postinc. We should already be modelling them as a reg so
don't want it to cause us to get the cost wrong. (I'm not sure that code
makes sense in general, but there are X86 tests specifically for it
where it seems to be helping so have left it around for the standard
non-post-inc case).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80273
These code patterns attempt to call isVMOVModifiedImm on a splat of i1
values, leading to an unreachable being hit. I've guarded the call on a
more specific set of sizes, as i1 vectors are legal under MVE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81860
Similar to VMOVN, a VQMOVN will only demand the top/bottom lanes of it's
first input. However unlike VMOVN it will need access to the entire
second argument, as that value is saturated not just moved in place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80515
These patterns for i8 and i16 VMLA's were missing. They end up from
legalized vector.reduce.add.v8i16 and vector.reduce.add.v16i8, and
although the instruction works differently (the mul and add are
performed in a higher precision), I believe it is OK because only an
i8/i16 are demanded from them, and so the results will be the same. At
least, they pass any testing I can think to run on them.
There are some tests that end up looking worse, but are quite artificial
due to passing half vector types through a call boundary. I would not
expect the vmull to realistically come up like that, and a vmlava is
likely better a lot of the time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80524
Summary:
In Thumb2's frame index rewriting process, the address mode i8s4, which
is used by LDRD and STRD instructions, is handled by taking the
immediate offset operand and multiplying it by 4.
This behaviour is wrong, however. In this specific address mode, the
MachineInstr's immediate operand is already in the expected form. By
consequence of that, multiplying it once more by 4 yields a flawed
offset value, four times greater than it should be.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80557
This temporarily reverts commit 7019cea26dfef5882c96f278c32d0f9c49a5e516.
It seems that, for some targets, there are instructions with a lot of memory operands (probably more than would be expected). This causes a lot of buildbots to timeout and notify failed builds. While investigations are ongoing to find out why this happens, revert the changes.
Summary:
To support all targets, the mayAlias member function needs to support instructions with multiple operands.
This revision also changes the order of the emitted instructions in some test cases.
Reviewers: efriedma, hfinkel, craig.topper, dmgreen
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: MatzeB, dmgreen, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80161
This is split off from D80316, slightly tightening the definition of overloaded
hardwareloop intrinsic llvm.loop.decrement.reg specifying that both operands
its result have the same type.
Previously, the LowOverheadLoops pass couldn't handle VPT blocks
with conditions, or with multiple VCTPs. This patch improves the
LowOverheadLoops pass so it can handle those cases.
It also adds support for VCMPs before the VCTP.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78206
