This moves some tests around to make it clearer what's being tested,
and adds very rudimentary comment syntax to the text input format to
make specifying this kind of test a little bit simpler.
llvm-svn: 214235
MSVC [1] thinks `UseListShuffleVector` needs a copy constructor, but I
don't. Let's see if being explicit about `UseListOrder` is convincing.
[1]: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lld-x86_64-win7/builds/11664/steps/build_Lld/logs/stdio
Here's the failure:
C:/lld-x86_64_win7/lld-x86_64-win7/llvm.src/include\llvm/IR/UseListOrder.h(92): error C2248: 'llvm::UseListShuffleVector::operator =' : cannot access private member declared in class 'llvm::UseListShuffleVector' (C:\lld-x86_64_win7\lld-x86_64-win7\llvm.src\lib\Bitcode\Writer\ValueEnumerator.cpp) [C:\lld-x86_64_win7\lld-x86_64-win7\llvm.obj\lib\Bitcode\Writer\LLVMBitWriter.vcxproj]
C:/lld-x86_64_win7/lld-x86_64-win7/llvm.src/include\llvm/IR/UseListOrder.h(56) : see declaration of 'llvm::UseListShuffleVector::operator ='
C:/lld-x86_64_win7/lld-x86_64-win7/llvm.src/include\llvm/IR/UseListOrder.h(32) : see declaration of 'llvm::UseListShuffleVector'
This diagnostic occurred in the compiler generated function 'llvm::UseListOrder &llvm::UseListOrder::operator =(const llvm::UseListOrder &)'
llvm-svn: 214224
Remove the copy constructor added in r214178 to appease MSVC17 since it
shouldn't be called at all. My guess is that explicitly deleting it
will make the compiler happy. To round out the operations I've also
deleted copy assignment and added move assignment. Otherwise no
functionality change.
llvm-svn: 214213
full paths for its first argument.
This allows us to remove the annoying sed lines in the test cases, and write
direct references to file names in stub_addr calls (rather than <filename>
placeholders).
llvm-svn: 214211
This will let users in other libraries know which error occurred. In particular,
it will be possible to check if the parsing failed or if the file is not
bitcode.
llvm-svn: 214209
Per feedback on r214111, we are going to use null to represent unspecified
parameter. If the type array is {null}, it means a function that returns void;
If the type array is {null, null}, it means a variadic function that returns
void. In summary if we have more than one element in the type array and the last
element is null, it is a variadic function.
rdar://17628609
llvm-svn: 214189
The test being performed is just an approximation anyway, so it really
shouldn't crash when things don't go entirely as expected.
Should fix PR20474.
llvm-svn: 214177
We need to make sure we use the softened version of all appropriate operands in
the libcall, or things go horribly wrong. This may entail actually executing a
1-stage softening.
llvm-svn: 214175
Fix the sort of expected order in the reader to correctly return `false`
when comparing a `Use` against itself.
This was caught by test/Bitcode/binaryIntInstructions.3.2.ll, so I'm
adding a `RUN` line using `llvm-uselistorder` for every test in
`test/Bitcode` that passes.
A few tests still fail, so I'll investigate those next.
This is part of PR5680.
llvm-svn: 214157
