The current infrastructure for exhaustive ConstantRange testing is
somewhat confusing in what exactly it tests and currently cannot even
be used for operations that produce smallest-size results, rather than
signed/unsigned envelopes.
This patch makes the testing more principled by collecting the exact
set of results of an operation into a bit set and then comparing it
against the range approximation by:
* Checking conservative correctness: All elements in the set must be
in the range.
* Checking optimality under a given preference function: None of the
(slack-free) ranges that can be constructed from the set are
preferred over the computed range.
Implemented preference functions are:
* PreferSmallest: Smallest range regardless of signed/unsigned wrapping
behavior. Probably what we would call "optimal" without further
qualification.
* PreferSmallestUnsigned/Signed: Smallest range that has no
unsigned/signed wrapping. We use this if our calculation is precise
only up to signed/unsigned envelope.
* PreferSmallestNonFullUnsigned/Signed: Smallest range that has no
unsigned/signed wrapping -- but preferring a smaller wrapping range
over a (non-wrapping) full range. We use this if we have a fully
precise calculation but apply a sign preference to the result
(union/intersection). Even with a sign preference, returning a
wrapping range is still "strictly better" than returning a full one.
This also addresses PR49273 by replacing the fragile manual range
construction logic in testBinarySetOperationExhaustive() with generic
code that isn't specialized to the particular form of ranges that set
operations can produces.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88356
In semi-automated environments, XFAILing or filtering out known regressions without actually committing changes or temporarily modifying the test suite can be quite useful.
Reviewed By: yln
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96662
This is a minor pattern-match update to BPFAdjustOpt.cpp to accept
not only 'or i1 a, b' but also 'select i1 a, i1 true, i1 b'.
This resolves regression after SimplifyCFG's creating select form
of and/or instead (https://reviews.llvm.org/D95026).
This is a small change, and currently such select form isn't created
or doesn't reach to the late pipeline (because InstCombine eagerly
folds it into and/or i1), so I chose to commit without a review process.
For ThinLTO, PreLink ICP is skipped to favor better profile annotation during LTO PostLink. This change applies the same tweak for MonoLTO. Note that PreLink ICP not only makes PostLink profile annotation harder, it is also uncoordinated with PostLink ICP so duplicated ICP could happen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97028
We don't currently create memory operands for these intrinsics,
but there was a suggestion of using the indexed load/store
intrinsics to implement isel for scalable vector gather/scatter.
That may propagate the memory operand from the gather/scatter
ISD nodes.
I think we can use here same logic as for nonnull.
strlen(X) - X must be noundef => valid pointer.
for libcalls with size arg, we add noundef only if size is known and greater than 0 - so pointers must be noundef (valid ones)
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, aqjune
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95122
There is a trailing dot in text section name if it has prefix, don't add
repeated dot when connect text section name and symbol name.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96327
Previously we would use the extended implementation, but
the extended implementation requires the vector type to be extended
so that we can access the LLVMContext. In theory we could
detect this case and use the context from the element type instead,
but since I know of no cases hitting this in practice today
I've done the simplest thing.
Also add asserts to several extended EVT functions that assume
LLVMTy is non-null.
Follow from discussion in D97036
Reviewed By: pengfei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97070
This commit adds the initial changes to the SystemZ target
description for the XPLINK 64-bit calling convention on z/OS.
Additions include:
- a new predicate IsTargetXPLINK64
- different register allocation order
- generaton of nopr after a call
Reviewed-by: uweigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96887
The existing implementation was relying on order of evaluation to achieve a particular result. This got really confusing when wanting to change the handling for arguments in a later patch.
The current getFoldedSizeOf() implementation uses naive recursion, which
could be really slow when the input structure type is too complex.
This issue was first brought up in
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8281; this change fixes it by
adding memoization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D6594
This patch fixed a bug when elbabi was supplied with a tbe file
contains no non-local symbol. Before this patch, it wrote 0 to
sh_info of the .dynsym section, making the ELF stub file invalid.
This patch fixed this issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96930
This is a fix for https://llvm.org/PR49215 either before/after
we make a verifier enhancement for vector reductions with D96904.
I'm not sure what the current thinking is for pointer math/logic
in IR. We allow icmp on pointer values. Therefore, we match min/max
patterns, so without this patch, the vectorizer could form a vector
reduction from that sequence.
But the LangRef definitions for min/max and vector reduction
intrinsics do not allow pointer types:
https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#llvm-smax-intrinsichttps://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#llvm-vector-reduce-umax-intrinsic
So we would crash/assert at some point - either in IR verification,
in the cost model, or in codegen. If we do want to allow this kind
of transform, we will need to update the LangRef and all of those
parts of the compiler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97047
We had more combinations of data and index lmuls than we needed.
Also add some asserts to verify that the IndexVT and data VT have
the same element count when we isel these pseudo instructions.
There are many legal combinations of index and data VTs supported
for these intrinsics. This results in a lot of isel patterns in
RISCVGenDAGISel.inc.
By adding a separate table similar to what we use for segment
load/stores, we can more efficiently manually select these
intrinsics. We should also be able to reuse this table scalable
vector gather/scatter.
This reduces the llc binary size by ~56K.
Reviewed By: khchen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97033
Just like we do for isel patterns, we need to call selectVLOp
to prevent 0 from being selected to X0 by the default isel.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97021
We previously used isel patterns for this, but that used quite
a bit of space in the isel table due to OR being associative
and commutative. It also wouldn't handle shifts/ands being in
reversed order.
This generalizes the shift/and matching from GREVI to
take the expected mask table as input so we can reuse it for
SHFLI.
There is no SHFLIW instruction, but we can promote a 32-bit
SHFLI to i64 on RV64. As long as bit 4 of the control bit isn't
set, a 64-bit SHFLI will preserve 33 sign bits if the input had
at least 33 sign bits. ComputeNumSignBits has been updated to
account for that to avoid sext.w in the tests.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96661
In https://reviews.llvm.org/rG5fb65c02ca5e91e7e1a00e0efdb8edc899f3e4b9,
We use 0 count value profile to memorize which target has been promoted
and prevent repeated ICP for the same target, so we delete PromotedInsns.
However, I found the implementation in the patch has some shortcomings
to be fixed otherwise there will still be repeated ICP. So I add
PromotedInsns back temorarily. Will remove it after I get a thorough fix.
This is to ensure that we can eliminate G_ASSERT_SEXT.
In a follow-up patch, I'm going to make CallLowering emit G_ASSERT_SEXT for
signext parameters.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96913
This enables use of MemorySSA instead of MemDep in MemCpyOpt. To
allow this without significant compile-time impact, the MemCpyOpt
pass is moved directly before DSE (in the cases where this was not
already the case), which allows us to reuse the existing MemorySSA
analysis.
Unlike the MemDep-based implementation, the MemorySSA-based MemCpyOpt
can also perform simple optimizations across basic blocks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94376
When computing a range for a SCEVUnknown, today we use computeKnownBits for unsigned ranges, and computeNumSignBots for signed ranges. This means we miss opportunities to improve range results.
One common missed pattern is that we have a signed range of a value which CKB can determine is positive, but CNSB doesn't convey that information. The current range includes the negative part, and is thus double the size.
Per the removed comment, the original concern which delayed using both (after some code merging years back) was a compile time concern. CTMark results (provided by Nikita, thanks!) showed a geomean impact of about 0.1%. This doesn't seem large enough to avoid higher quality results.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96534
VirtRegAuxInfo is an extensibility point, so the register allocator's
decision on which implementation to use should be communicated to the
other users - namely, LiveRangeEdit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96898
fixed-abi uses pre-defined and predictable
SGPR/VGPRs for passing arguments. This patch makes
this scheme default when HSA OS is specified in triple.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96340
