when the top elements of a vector are undefined. This happens all
the time for X86-64 ABI stuff because only the low 2 elements of
a 4 element vector are defined. For example, on:
_Complex float f32(_Complex float A, _Complex float B) {
return A+B;
}
We used to produce (with SSE2, SSE4.1+ uses insertps):
_f32: ## @f32
movdqa %xmm0, %xmm2
addss %xmm1, %xmm2
pshufd $16, %xmm2, %xmm2
pshufd $1, %xmm1, %xmm1
pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm0
addss %xmm1, %xmm0
pshufd $16, %xmm0, %xmm1
movdqa %xmm2, %xmm0
unpcklps %xmm1, %xmm0
ret
We now produce:
_f32: ## @f32
movdqa %xmm0, %xmm2
addss %xmm1, %xmm2
pshufd $1, %xmm1, %xmm1
pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm3
addss %xmm1, %xmm3
movaps %xmm2, %xmm0
unpcklps %xmm3, %xmm0
ret
This implements rdar://8368414
llvm-svn: 112378
all the other LDM/STM instructions. This fixes asm printer crashes when
compiling with -O0. I've changed one of the NEON tests (vst3.ll) to run
with -O0 to check this in the future.
Prior to this change VLDM/VSTM used addressing mode #5, but not really.
The offset field was used to hold a count of the number of registers being
loaded or stored, and the AM5 opcode field was expanded to specify the IA
or DB mode, instead of the standard ADD/SUB specifier. Much of the backend
was not aware of these special cases. The crashes occured when rewriting
a frameindex caused the AM5 offset field to be changed so that it did not
have a valid submode. I don't know exactly what changed to expose this now.
Maybe we've never done much with -O0 and NEON. Regardless, there's no longer
any reason to keep a count of the VLDM/VSTM registers, so we can use
addressing mode #4 and clean things up in a lot of places.
llvm-svn: 112322
A = shl x, 42
...
B = lshr ..., 38
which can be transformed into:
A = shl x, 4
...
iff we can prove that the would-be-shifted-in bits
are already zero. This eliminates two shifts in the testcase
and allows eliminate of the whole i128 chain in the real example.
llvm-svn: 112314
framework, which is good at ripping through bitfield
operations. This generalize a bunch of the existing
xforms that instcombine does, such as
(x << c) >> c -> and
to handle intermediate logical nodes. This is useful for
ripping up the "promote to large integer" code produced by
SRoA.
llvm-svn: 112304
by the SRoA "promote to large integer" code, eliminating
some type conversions like this:
%94 = zext i16 %93 to i32 ; <i32> [#uses=2]
%96 = lshr i32 %94, 8 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
%101 = trunc i32 %96 to i8 ; <i8> [#uses=1]
This also unblocks other xforms from happening, now clang is able to compile:
struct S { float A, B, C, D; };
float foo(struct S A) { return A.A + A.B+A.C+A.D; }
into:
_foo: ## @foo
## BB#0: ## %entry
pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm2
addss %xmm0, %xmm2
movdqa %xmm1, %xmm3
addss %xmm2, %xmm3
pshufd $1, %xmm1, %xmm0
addss %xmm3, %xmm0
ret
on x86-64, instead of:
_foo: ## @foo
## BB#0: ## %entry
movd %xmm0, %rax
shrq $32, %rax
movd %eax, %xmm2
addss %xmm0, %xmm2
movapd %xmm1, %xmm3
addss %xmm2, %xmm3
movd %xmm1, %rax
shrq $32, %rax
movd %eax, %xmm0
addss %xmm3, %xmm0
ret
This seems pretty close to optimal to me, at least without
using horizontal adds. This also triggers in lots of other
code, including SPEC.
llvm-svn: 112278
fix: add a flag to MapValue and friends which indicates whether
any module-level mappings are being made. In the common case of
inlining, no module-level mappings are needed, so MapValue doesn't
need to examine non-function-local metadata, which can be very
expensive in the case of a large module with really deep metadata
(e.g. a large C++ program compiled with -g).
This flag is a little awkward; perhaps eventually it can be moved
into the ClonedCodeInfo class.
llvm-svn: 112190
expanding: e.g. <2 x float> -> <4 x float> instead of -> 2 floats. This
affects two places in the code: handling cross block values and handling
function return and arguments. Since vectors are already widened by
legalizetypes, this gives us much better code and unblocks x86-64 abi
and SPU abi work.
For example, this (which is a silly example of a cross-block value):
define <4 x float> @test2(<4 x float> %A) nounwind {
%B = shufflevector <4 x float> %A, <4 x float> undef, <2 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1>
%C = fadd <2 x float> %B, %B
br label %BB
BB:
%D = fadd <2 x float> %C, %C
%E = shufflevector <2 x float> %D, <2 x float> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 undef, i32 undef>
ret <4 x float> %E
}
Now compiles into:
_test2: ## @test2
## BB#0:
addps %xmm0, %xmm0
addps %xmm0, %xmm0
ret
previously it compiled into:
_test2: ## @test2
## BB#0:
addps %xmm0, %xmm0
pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1
## kill: XMM0<def> XMM0<kill> XMM0<def>
insertps $0, %xmm0, %xmm0
insertps $16, %xmm1, %xmm0
addps %xmm0, %xmm0
ret
This implements rdar://8230384
llvm-svn: 112101
comparison that would overflow.
- The other under/overflow cases can't actually happen because the immediates
which would trigger them are legal (so we don't enter this code), but
adjusted the style to make it clear the transform is always valid.
llvm-svn: 112053
