We already had an assert for foo->RAUW(foo), but not for something like
foo->RAUW(GEP(foo)) and would go in an infinite loop trying to apply
the replacement.
llvm-svn: 208663
Normally, patterns like (add x, (setcc cc ...)) will be folded into
(csel x, x+1, not cc). However, if there is a ZEXT after SETCC, they
won't be folded. This patch recognizes the ZEXT and allows the
generation of CSINC.
This patch fixes bug 19680.
llvm-svn: 208660
The problem occurs when a non-i1 setcc is inverted. For example 'i8 = setcc' will get 'xor 0xff' to invert this. This is clearly wrong when the boolean contents are ZeroOrOne.
This patch introduces getLogicalNOT and updates SetCC legalisation to use it.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 208641
Right now the load may not get DCE'd because of the side-effect of updating
the base pointer.
This can happen if we lower a read-modify-write of an illegal larger type
(e.g. i48) such that the modification only affects one of the subparts (the
lower i32 part but not the higher i16 part). See the testcase.
In order to spot the dead load we need to revisit it when SimplifyDemandedBits
decided that the value of the load is masked off. This is the
CommitTargetLoweringOpt piece.
I checked compile time with ARM64 by sending SPEC bitcode files through llc.
No measurable change.
Fixes <rdar://problem/16031651>
llvm-svn: 208640
r208453 added support for having sret on the second parameter. In that
change, the code for copying sret into a virtual register was hoisted
into the loop that lowers formal parameters. This caused a "Wrong
topological sorting" assertion failure during scheduling when a
parameter is passed in memory. This change undoes that by creating a
second loop that deals with sret.
I'm worried that this fix is incomplete. I don't fully understand the
dependence issues. However, with this change we produce the same DAGs
we used to produce, so if they are broken, they are just as broken as
they have always been.
llvm-svn: 208637
SECTDIFF relocations on 32-bit x86.
This fixes several of the MCJIT regression test failures that show up on 32-bit
builds.
<rdar://problem/16886294>
llvm-svn: 208635
For some impending improvements to debug info, LLVM will start assuming
that when the CU specifies llvm::DIBuilder::LineTablesOnly, the IR for
functions described by that CU will not include variables, types, etc.
(might be worth having some test coverage for GMLT + non-GMLT CUs,
especially with non-GMLT functions inlined into GMLT CU functions)
llvm-svn: 208634
Tested by comparing make check VERBOSE=1 before and after to make sure
no tests are missed. (VERBOSE=1 prints the list of tests.)
Only one test :( remains where .cpp is required:
tools/llvm-cov/range_based_for.cpp:// RUN: llvm-cov range_based_for.cpp | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STDOUT
The topic was discussed in this thread:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140428/214905.html
llvm-svn: 208621
The current patterns for REV16 misses mostn __builtin_bswap16() due to
legalization promoting the operands to from load/stores toi32s and then
truncing/extending them. This patch adds new patterns that catch the resultant
DAGs and codegens them to rev16 instructions. Tests included.
rdar://15353652
llvm-svn: 208620
One test case had to be updated as it still had the extra indirection
for the variable list - removing the extra indirection got it back to
passing.
llvm-svn: 208608
This is a slightly different approach to AArch64 (the base instruction
definitions aren't quite right for that to work), but achieves the
same thing and reduces C++ hackery in AsmParser.
llvm-svn: 208605
Summary:
Also use named constants for common opcode fields.
Depends on D3669
Reviewers: jkolek, vmedic, zoran.jovanovic
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3670
llvm-svn: 208582
There are some interesting decisions based on non-obvious rationale in
the ARM64-BE NEON implementation - decent documentation is definitely required.
llvm-svn: 208577
Summary: The 'mul' line of the test is temporarily commented out because it currently matches the MIPS32 mul instead of the MIPS32r6 mul. This line will be uncommented when we disable the MIPS32 mul on MIPS32r6.
Reviewers: jkolek, zoran.jovanovic, vmedic
Reviewed By: vmedic
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3668
llvm-svn: 208576
