Update a few tests to use llvm.masked.load/store instead of arm neon
vector loads and stores, and move the tests that are actually specific
to those arm intrinsics to their own files. This lets us mark the
tests that use target specific intrinsics as requiring those targets.
llvm-svn: 302972
Implemented frequency based cost/saving analysis
and related options.
The pass is now in a state ready to be turne on
in the pipeline (in follow up).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D32783
llvm-svn: 302967
We end up dereferencing the end iterator here when the Aspect doesn't exist in the DefaultAction map.
Change the API to return Optional<LLT> and return None when not found.
Also update the callers to handle the None case
llvm-svn: 302963
We already counted the number of bits in the RHS so its pretty cheap to just check if the RHS is 1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33154
llvm-svn: 302953
This helped the compiler generate better code for the single word case. It was able to remember that the bit width was still a single word when it created the Remainder APInt and not create code for it possibly being multiword.
llvm-svn: 302952
Summary:
We should not change volatile loads/stores in promoting alloca to vector.
Reviewers:
arsenm
Differential Revision:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D33107
llvm-svn: 302943
This fixes 47 of the 75 NVPTX '-verify-machineinstrs with EXPENSIVE_CHECKS' errors in PR32146.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33147
llvm-svn: 302942
Summary:
As discussed in the D32195 review thread and on IRC, remove this option
and replace with parameter, which will be set to true when invoked
from clang in the context of a ThinLTO distributed backend.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33133
llvm-svn: 302939
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
Summary:
Eli pointed out that it's unsafe to combine the shifts to ISD::SHL etc.,
because those are not defined for b > sizeof(a) * 8, even after some of
the combiners run.
However, PPCISD::SHL defines that behavior (as the instructions themselves).
Move the combination to the backend.
The tests in shift_mask.ll still pass.
Reviewers: echristo, hfinkel, efriedma, iteratee
Subscribers: nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33076
llvm-svn: 302937
This adds a visitor that is capable of accessing type
records randomly and caching intermediate results that it
learns about during partial linear scans. This yields
amortized O(1) access to a type stream even though type
streams cannot normally be indexed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33009
llvm-svn: 302936
At this point in the code rhsWords is guaranteed to be non-zero and less than or equal to lhsWords. So if lhsWords is 1, rhsWords must also be 1. urem alread had the check removed so this makes all 3 consistent.
llvm-svn: 302930
This patch adds min/max population count, leading/trailing zero/one bit counting methods.
The min methods return answers based on bits that are known without considering unknown bits. The max methods give answers taking into account the largest count that unknown bits could give.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32931
llvm-svn: 302925
CodeViewDebug sets Asm to nullptr to disable debug info generation. You
can get a .ll file like no-cus.ll from 'clang -gcodeview -g0', which
happens in the ubsan test suite.
llvm-svn: 302923
The functions in MathExtras.h uses a safer memcpy instead of going through a union.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33116
llvm-svn: 302916
This code was missing a check for stores, so we were thinking the
congruency class didn't have any memory members, and reset the
memory leader.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33056
llvm-svn: 302905
This is a follow up patch for https://reviews.llvm.org/rL300440
to address a comment.
To make implementation to be consistent with other cases we just
ignore the remainder after distribution of remaining probability between
reachable edges.
If we reduced the probability of some edges coming to unreachable
blocks we should distribute the remaining part across other edges
coming to reachable blocks to satisfy the condition that sum of all
probabilities should be equal to one. If this remaining part is not
divided by number of "reachable" edges then we get this remainder.
This remainder probability should be pretty small. Other cases just ignore
if the sum of probabilities is not equal to one so we do the same.
Reviewers: chandlerc, sanjoy, vsk, junbuml, reames
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: reames, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32124
llvm-svn: 302883
I tried to compile LLD using GCC 7.1.0 and got warnings like
"warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]"
(some more details are here: D32907)
GCC's __cplusplus value is 201402L by default, so macro expands to nothing,
though GCC 7 has support for [[fallthrough]].
Patch uses gnu::fallthrough when it is available and fixes warning I am observing.
Initial idea of way to fix belongs to Davide Italiano.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33036
llvm-svn: 302878
Llvm-stress discovered that a COPY may end up in ExpandPostRA::LowerCopy()
with an undef source operand. It is not possible for the target to handle
this, as this flag is not passed to TII->copyPhysReg().
This patch solves this by treating such a COPY as an identity COPY.
Review: Matthias Braun
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32892
llvm-svn: 302877
Summary:
Instead of using RemoveExtraEdges (which uses analyzeBranch, which cannot
always be trusted) at the end to fixup the CFG we keep the CFG updated as
we go along and remove or add branches and merge blocks.
This way we won't have any problems if the involved MBBs contain
unanalyzable instructions.
This fixes PR32721.
In that case we had a triangle
EBB
| \
| |
| TBB
| /
FBB
where FBB didn't have any successors at all since it ended with an
unconditional return. Then TBB and FBB were be merged into EBB, but EBB
would still keep its successors, and the use of analyzeBranch and
CorrectExtraCFGEdges wouldn't help to remove them since the return
instruction is not analyzable (at least not on ARM).
Reviewers: kparzysz, iteratee, MatzeB
Reviewed By: iteratee
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33037
llvm-svn: 302876
invariant PHI inputs and to rewrite PHI nodes during the actual
unswitching.
The checking is quite easy, but rewriting the PHI nodes is somewhat
surprisingly challenging. This should handle both branches and switches.
I think this is now a full featured trivial unswitcher, and more full
featured than the trivial cases in the old pass while still being (IMO)
somewhat simpler in how it works.
Next up is to verify its correctness in more widespread testing, and
then to add non-trivial unswitching.
Thanks to Davide and Sanjoy for the excellent review. There is one
remaining question that I may address in a follow-up patch (see the
review thread for details) but it isn't related to the functionality
specifically.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32699
llvm-svn: 302867
