Before this change, the program:
int var;
int main(void) { return 0; }
when run under 'nm -g' would show 'U var' with the gold plugin and
'B var' with gcc.
llvm-svn: 64616
when I was looking at functions used by python.
Highlights include, better largefile support (64-bit file sizes on 32-bit
systems), fputs string is nocapture, popen/pclose added (popen being noalias
return), modf and frexp and friends. Also added some missing 'break' statements
and combined identical sections.
llvm-svn: 64615
Cleanup some warning.
Remark: when struct/class are declared differently than they are defined, this make problem for VC++ since it seems to mangle class differently that struct. These error are very hard to understand and find. So please, try to keep your definition/declaration in sync.
Only tested with VS2008. hope it does not break anything. feel free to revert.
llvm-svn: 64554
taken advantage of anywhere. Change the definition
of IntrWriteArgMem to no longer imply nocapture, and
explicitly add nocapture attributes everywhere (well,
not quite everywhere, because some of these intrinsics
did capture their arguments!). Also, make clear that
the lack of other side-effects does not exclude doing
volatile loads or stores - the atomic intrinsics do
these, yet they are all marked IntrWriteArgMem (this
change is safe because nothing exploited it).
llvm-svn: 64539
- Test for signed and unsigned wrapping conditions, instead of just
testing for non-negative induction ranges.
- Handle loops with GT comparisons, in addition to LT comparisons.
- Support more cases of induction variables that don't start at 0.
llvm-svn: 64532
being used for atomic intrinsics, it seems the
access may be volatile. No code was exploiting
the original non-volatile definition, so only
the comment needs changing.
llvm-svn: 64464
Make sure the SCC pass manager initializes any contained
function pass managers. Without this, simplify-libcalls
would add nocapture attributes when run on its own, but
not when run as part of -std-compile-opts or similar.
llvm-svn: 64443
couldn't ever be the return of call instruction. However, it's quite possible
that said local allocation is itself the return of a function call. That's
what malloc and calloc are for, actually.
llvm-svn: 64442
addrec in a different loop to check the value being added to
the accumulated Start value, not the Start value before it has
the new value added to it. This prevents LSR from going crazy
on the included testcase. Dale, please review.
llvm-svn: 64440
