Add the instruction alias sgtu (register form only), two operand forms of
s[rl]l and sra, and missing single/two operand forms of dnegu/neg.
Reviewers: dsanders
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22752
llvm-svn: 276736
Commit r266977 was reason for failing LLVM test suite with error message: fatal error: error in backend: Cannot select: t17: i32 = rotr t2, t11 ...
llvm-svn: 267418
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17137
This patch was reverted after the revertion of dependant patch http://reviews.llvm.org/D17068.
There was the problem with test-suite failure.
The problem is hopefully solved with dependant patch so this patch is commited again.
llvm-svn: 266179
Summary:
Also renamed li_simm7 to li16_imm since it's not a simm7 and has an unusual
encoding (it's a uimm7 except that 0x7f represents -1).
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18145
llvm-svn: 264056
Summary:
Previously, it would always select DEXT and substitute any invalid matches
for DEXTU/DEXTM during MipsMCCodeEmitter::encodeInstruction(). This works
but causes problems when adding range checked immediates to IAS.
Now isel selects the correct variant up front.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16810
llvm-svn: 262229
Summary:
The bugs were:
* teq and similar take 4-bit unsigned immediates on microMIPS.
* teqi and similar have side-effects like teq do.
* shll_s.w and shra_r.w take 5-bit unsigned immediates.
* The various DSP ext* instructions take a 5-bit immediate.
* repl.qh takes an 8-bit unsigned immediate.
* repl.ph takes a 10-bit unsigned immediate.
* rddsp/wrdsp take a 10-bit unsigned immediate.
* teqi and similar take signed 16-bit immediates (10-bit for microMIPS).
* Out-of-range immediate macros for or/xor take a simm32/simm64 depending
on architecture. I'll fix the simm64 case properly when I reach simm32.
lui is a bit more lenient than GAS and accepts signed immediates in addition
to unsigned. This is because MipsMCExpr can produce signed values when
constant folding and it currently lacks a way of knowing it should fold to
an unsigned value.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15446
llvm-svn: 259360
Commited patch was intended to implement LH, LHE, LHU and LHUE instructions.
After commit test-suite failed with error message in the form of:
fatal error: error in backend: Cannot select: t124: i32,ch = load<LD2[%d](tbaa=<0x94acc48>), sext from i16> t0, t2, undef:i32
For that reason I decided to revert commit r254897 and make new patch which besides implementation and standard regression tests will also have dedicated tests (CodeGen) for the above error.
llvm-svn: 255109
Summary:
We don't check the size operand on ext/dext*/ins/dins* yet because the
permitted range depends on the pos argument and we can't check that using
this mechanism.
The bug was that dextu/dinsu accepted 0..31 in the pos operand instead of 32..63.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: llvm-commits, dsanders
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15190
llvm-svn: 255015
Summary:
The bugs were:
* append, prepend, and balign were not tested
* balign takes a uimm2 not a uimm5.
* drotr32 was correctly implemented with a uimm5 but the tests expected
'52' to be valid.
* li/la were implemented with a uimm5 instead of simm32. simm32 isn't
completely correct either but I'll fix that when I get to simm32.
A notable omission are some of the shift instructions. Several of these
have been implemented using a single uimm6 instruction (rather than two
uimm5 instructions and a CodeGen-only uimm6 pseudo). These will be updated
in the uimm6 patch.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: llvm-commits, dsanders
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14712
llvm-svn: 254164
Summary:
The bug was that the MIPS32R6/MIPS64R6/microMIPS32R6 versions of LSA and DLSA
(unlike the MSA version) failed to account for the off-by-one encoding of the
immediate. The range is actually 1..4 rather than 0..3.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: atanasyan, dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14015
llvm-svn: 252295
