To make sure branches are in range, we need to do a better job of estimating
the length of an inline assembly block than "it's probably 1 instruction, who'd
write asm with more than that?".
Fortunately there's already a (highly suspect, see how many ways you can think
of to break it!) callback for this purpose, which is used by the other targets.
rdar://problem/17277590
llvm-svn: 211095
There's probably no acatual change in behaviour here, just updating
the LowerFP_TO_INT function to be more similar to the reverse
implementation and updating costs to current CodeGen.
llvm-svn: 210985
inverted condition codes (CINC, CINV, CNEG, CSET, and CSETM).
Matching aliases based on "immediate classes", when disassembling,
wasn't previously supported, hence adding MCOperandPredicate
into class Operand, and implementing the support for it
in AsmWriterEmitter.
The parsing for those aliases was already custom, so just adding
the missing condition into AArch64AsmParser::parseCondCode.
llvm-svn: 210528
As Ana Pazos pointed out, these have to be restored to their incoming values
before a function returns; i.e. before the tail call. So they can't be used
correctly as the destination register.
llvm-svn: 210525
Previously we were abandonning the attempt, leading to some combination of
extra work (when selection of a load/store fails completely) and inferior code
(when this leads to a real memcpy call instead of inlining).
rdar://problem/17187463
llvm-svn: 210520
We were hitting an assert if FastISel couldn't create the load or store we
requested. Currently this happens for large frame-local addresses, though
CodeGen could be improved there.
rdar://problem/17187463
llvm-svn: 210519
I saw at least a memory leak or two from inspection (on probably
untested error paths) and r206991, which was the original inspiration
for this change.
I ran this idea by Jim Grosbach a few weeks ago & he was OK with it.
Since it's a basically mechanical patch that seemed sufficient - usual
post-commit review, revert, etc, as needed.
llvm-svn: 210427
This means the output of LowerFormalArguments returns a lowered
SDValue with the correct type (expected in SelectionDAGBuilder).
Without this, an assertion under a DEBUG macro triggers when those
types are passed on the stack.
llvm-svn: 210102
The C and C++ semantics for compare_exchange require it to return a bool
indicating success. This gets mapped to LLVM IR which follows each cmpxchg with
an icmp of the value loaded against the desired value.
When lowered to ldxr/stxr loops, this extra comparison is redundant: its
results are implicit in the control-flow of the function.
This commit makes two changes: it replaces that icmp with appropriate PHI
nodes, and then makes sure earlyCSE is called after expansion to actually make
use of the opportunities revealed.
I've also added -{arm,aarch64}-enable-atomic-tidy options, so that
existing fragile tests aren't perturbed too much by the change. Many
of them either rely on undef/unreachable too pervasively to be
restored to something well-defined (particularly while making sure
they test the same obscure assert from many years ago), or depend on a
particular CFG shape, which is disrupted by SimplifyCFG.
rdar://problem/16227836
llvm-svn: 209883
This matches gcc's behavior. It also seems natural given that aliases
contain other properties that govern how it is accessed (linkage,
visibility, dll storage).
Clang still has to be updated to expose this feature to C.
llvm-svn: 209759
A test in test/Generic creates a DAG where the NZCV output of an ADCS is used
by multiple nodes. This makes LLVM want to save a copy of NZCV for later, which
it couldn't do before.
This should be the last fix required for the aarch64 buildbot.
llvm-svn: 209651
These are tested by test/CodeGen/Generic, so we should probably know
how to deal with them. Fortunately generic code does it if asked.
llvm-svn: 209646
This commit is debatable. There are two possible approaches, neither
of which is really satisfactory:
1. Use "@foo(i1 zeroext)" to mean an extension to 32-bits on Darwin,
and 8 bits otherwise.
2. Redefine "@foo(i1)" to mean that the i1 is extended by the caller
to 8 bits. This goes against the spirit of "zeroext" I think, but
it's a bit of a vague construct anyway (by definition you're going
to extend to the amount required by the ABI, that's why it's the
ABI!).
This implements option 2. The DAG machinery really isn't setup for the
first (there's a fairly strong assumption that "zeroext" goes to at
least the smallest register size), and even if it was the resulting
DAG looks like it would be inferior in many cases.
Theoretically we could add AssertZext nodes in the consumers of
ABI-passed values too now, but this actually seems to make the code
worse in practice by making truncation proceed in two steps. The code
produced is equally valid if we continue to assume only the low bit is
defined.
Should fix PR19850
llvm-svn: 209637
We can eliminate the custom C++ code in favour of some TableGen to
check the same things. Functionality should be identical, except for a
buffer overrun that was present in the C++ code and meant webkit
failed if any small argument needed to be passed on the stack.
llvm-svn: 209636
The code emitted is what would be expected for the small model, so it
shouldn't be used when objects can be the full 64-bits away.
This fixes MCJIT tests on Linux.
llvm-svn: 209585
This commit starts with a "git mv ARM64 AArch64" and continues out
from there, renaming the C++ classes, intrinsics, and other
target-local objects for consistency.
"ARM64" test directories are also moved, and tests that began their
life in ARM64 use an arm64 triple, those from AArch64 use an aarch64
triple. Both should be equivalent though.
This finishes the AArch64 merge, and everyone should feel free to
continue committing as normal now.
llvm-svn: 209577
I'm doing this in two phases for a better "git blame" record. This
commit removes the previous AArch64 backend and redirects all
functionality to ARM64. It also deduplicates test-lines and removes
orphaned AArch64 tests.
The next step will be "git mv ARM64 AArch64" and rewire most of the
tests.
Hopefully LLVM is still functional, though it would be even better if
no-one ever had to care because the rename happens straight
afterwards.
llvm-svn: 209576
