ARMv6K is another layer between ARMV6 and ARMV6T2. This is the LLVM
side of the changes.
ARMV6 family LLVM implementation.
+-------------------------------------+
| ARMV6 |
+----------------+--------------------+
| ARMV6M (thumb) | ARMV6K (arm,thumb) | <- From ARMV6K and ARMV6M processors
+----------------+--------------------+ have support for hint instructions
| ARMV6T2 (arm,thumb,thumb2) | (SEV/WFE/WFI/NOP/YIELD). They can
+-------------------------------------+ be either real or default to NOP.
| ARMV7 (arm,thumb,thumb2) | The two processors also use
+-------------------------------------+ different encoding for them.
Patch by Vinicius Tinti.
llvm-svn: 232468
This patch is in response to r223147 where the avaiable features are
computed based on ".cpu" directive. This will work clean for the standard
variants like cortex-a9. For custom variants which rely on standard cpu names
for assembly, the additional features of a CPU should be propagated. This can be
done via ".arch_extension" as long as the assembler supports it. The
implementation for krait along with unit test will be submitted in next patch.
llvm-svn: 230650
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7065
llvm-svn: 229831
A null MCTargetStreamer allows IRObjectFile to ignore target-specific
directives. Previously we were crashing.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7711
llvm-svn: 229797
Any code creating an MCSectionELF knows ELF and already provides the flags.
SectionKind is an abstraction used by common code that uses a plain
MCSection.
Use the flags to compute the SectionKind. This removes a lot of
guessing and boilerplate from the MCSectionELF construction.
llvm-svn: 227476
Windows supports a restricted set of relocations (compared to ARM ELF). In some
cases, we may end up generating an unsupported relocation. This can occur with
bad input to the assembler in particular (the frontend should never generate
code that cannot be compiled). Generate an error rather than just aborting.
The change in the API is driven by the desire to provide a slightly more helpful
message for debugging purposes.
llvm-svn: 226779
The fixes are to note that AArch64 has additional restrictions on when local
relocations can be used. In particular, ld64 requires that relocations to
cstring/cfstrings use linker visible symbols.
Original message:
In an assembly expression like
bar:
.long L0 + 1
the intended semantics is that bar will contain a pointer one byte past L0.
In sections that are merged by content (strings, 4 byte constants, etc), a
single position in the section doesn't give the linker enough information.
For example, it would not be able to tell a relocation must point to the
end of a string, since that would look just like the start of the next.
The solution used in ELF to use relocation with symbols if there is a non-zero
addend.
In MachO before this patch we would just keep all symbols in some sections.
This would miss some cases (only cstrings on x86_64 were implemented) and was
inefficient since most relocations have an addend of 0 and can be represented
without the symbol.
This patch implements the non-zero addend logic for MachO too.
llvm-svn: 226503
utils/sort_includes.py.
I clearly haven't done this in a while, so more changed than usual. This
even uncovered a missing include from the InstrProf library that I've
added. No functionality changed here, just mechanical cleanup of the
include order.
llvm-svn: 225974
One is that AArch64 has additional restrictions on when local relocations can
be used. We have to take those into consideration when deciding to put a L
symbol in the symbol table or not.
The other is that ld64 requires the relocations to cstring to use linker
visible symbols on AArch64.
Thanks to Michael Zolotukhin for testing this!
Remove doesSectionRequireSymbols.
In an assembly expression like
bar:
.long L0 + 1
the intended semantics is that bar will contain a pointer one byte past L0.
In sections that are merged by content (strings, 4 byte constants, etc), a
single position in the section doesn't give the linker enough information.
For example, it would not be able to tell a relocation must point to the
end of a string, since that would look just like the start of the next.
The solution used in ELF to use relocation with symbols if there is a non-zero
addend.
In MachO before this patch we would just keep all symbols in some sections.
This would miss some cases (only cstrings on x86_64 were implemented) and was
inefficient since most relocations have an addend of 0 and can be represented
without the symbol.
This patch implements the non-zero addend logic for MachO too.
llvm-svn: 225644
This adds support for parsing and emitting the SBREL relocation variant for the
ARM target. Handling this relocation variant is necessary for supporting the
full ARM ELF specification. Addresses PR22128.
llvm-svn: 225595
This is affecting the behavior of some ObjC++ / AArch64 test cases on Darwin.
Reverting to get the bots green while I track down the source of the changed
behavior.
llvm-svn: 225311
Claim conformance to version 2.09 of the ARM ABI.
This build attribute must be emitted first amongst the build attributes when
written to an object file. This is to simplify conformance detection by
consumers.
Change-Id: If9eddcfc416bc9ad6e5cc8cdcb05d0031af7657e
llvm-svn: 225166
The issues was that AArch64 has additional restrictions on when local
relocations can be used. We have to take those into consideration when
deciding to put a L symbol in the symbol table or not.
Original message:
Remove doesSectionRequireSymbols.
In an assembly expression like
bar:
.long L0 + 1
the intended semantics is that bar will contain a pointer one byte past L0.
In sections that are merged by content (strings, 4 byte constants, etc), a
single position in the section doesn't give the linker enough information.
For example, it would not be able to tell a relocation must point to the
end of a string, since that would look just like the start of the next.
The solution used in ELF to use relocation with symbols if there is a non-zero
addend.
In MachO before this patch we would just keep all symbols in some sections.
This would miss some cases (only cstrings on x86_64 were implemented) and was
inefficient since most relocations have an addend of 0 and can be represented
without the symbol.
This patch implements the non-zero addend logic for MachO too.
llvm-svn: 225048
In an assembly expression like
bar:
.long L0 + 1
the intended semantics is that bar will contain a pointer one byte past L0.
In sections that are merged by content (strings, 4 byte constants, etc), a
single position in the section doesn't give the linker enough information.
For example, it would not be able to tell a relocation must point to the
end of a string, since that would look just like the start of the next.
The solution used in ELF to use relocation with symbols if there is a non-zero
addend.
In MachO before this patch we would just keep all symbols in some sections.
This would miss some cases (only cstrings on x86_64 were implemented) and was
inefficient since most relocations have an addend of 0 and can be represented
without the symbol.
This patch implements the non-zero addend logic for MachO too.
llvm-svn: 224985
Bob Wilson pointed out the unnecessary checks that had been committed to the
instruction check predicates. The check was meant to ensure that the check was
not accidentally applied to non-ARM instructions. This is better served as an
assertion rather than a condition check.
llvm-svn: 224825
The ARM ARM states:
LDM/LDMIA/LDMFD:
The SP can be in the list. However, ARM deprecates using these instructions
with SP in the list.
ARM deprecates using these instructions with both the LR and the PC in the
list.
LDMDA/LDMFA/LDMDB/LDMEA/LDMIB/LDMED:
The SP can be in the list. However, instructions that include the SP in the
list are deprecated.
Instructions that include both the LR and the PC in the list are deprecated.
POP:
The SP can only be in the list before ARMv7. ARM deprecates any use of ARM
instructions that include the SP, and the value of the SP after such an
instruction is UNKNOWN.
ARM deprecates the use of this instruction with both the LR and the PC in
the list.
Attempt to diagnose use of deprecated forms of these instructions. This mirrors
the previous changes to diagnose use of the deprecated forms of STM in ARM mode.
llvm-svn: 224682
The use of SP and PC in the register list for stores is deprecated on ARM
(ARM ARM A.8.8.199):
ARM deprecates the use of ARM instructions that include the SP or the PC in
the list.
Provide a deprecation warning from the assembler in the case that the syntax is
ever seen.
llvm-svn: 224319
Use the MCAsmInfo instead of the DataLayout, and allow
specifying a custom prefix for labels specifically. HSAIL
requires that labels begin with @, but global symbols with &.
llvm-svn: 223323
Certain ARM instructions accept 32-bit immediate operands encoded as a 8-bit
integer value (0-255) and a 4-bit rotation (0-30, even). Current ARM assembly
syntax support in LLVM allows the decoded (32-bit) immediate to be specified
as a single immediate operand for such instructions:
mov r0, #4278190080
The ARMARM defines an extended assembly syntax allowing the encoding to be made
more explicit, as in:
mov r0, #255, #8 ; (same 32-bit value as above)
The behaviour of the two instructions can be different w.r.t flags, which is
documented under "Modified immediate constants" in ARMARM. This patch enables
support for this extended syntax at the MC layer.
llvm-svn: 223113
The string data for string-valued build attributes were being unconditionally
uppercased. There is no mention in the ARM ABI addenda about case conventions,
so it's technically implementation defined as to whether the data are
capitialised in some way or not. However, there are good reasons not to
captialise the data.
* It's less work.
* Some vendors may legitimately have case-sensitive checks for these
attributes which would fail on LLVM generated object files.
* There could be locale issues with uppercasing.
The original reasons for uppercasing appear to have stemmed from an
old codesourcery toolchain behaviour, see
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.cvs/87133
This patch makes the object file emitted no longer captialise string
data, it encodes as seen in the assembly source.
Change-Id: Ibe20dd6e60d2773d57ff72a78470839033aa5538
llvm-svn: 222882
On x86_64 this brings it from 80 bytes to 64 bytes. Also make any member
variables private and clean up uses to go through the existing accessors.
NFC.
llvm-svn: 219573
The Cortex-M7 has 3 options for its FPU: none, FPv5-SP-D16 and
FPv5-DP-D16. FPv5 has the same instructions as FP-ARMv8, so it can be
modelled using the same target feature, and all double-precision
operations are already disabled by the fp-only-sp target features.
llvm-svn: 218747
On ARM NEON, VAND with immediate (16/32 bits) is an alias to VBIC ~imm with
the same type size. Adding that logic to the parser, and generating VBIC
instructions from VAND asm files.
This patch also fixes the validation routines for NEON splat immediates which
were wrong.
Fixes PR20702.
llvm-svn: 218450
objects. There were a few FIXMEs in ARMAsmBackend.cpp suggesting the class
definitions should be in a separate file. Starting with ARMAsmBackend, the
class definition has been put in a header file, and #includes reduced. Each
sub-type of ARMAsmBackend is now in its own header file.
Derived types have been painted with a different color of bike-shed:
s/DarwinARMAsmBackend/ARMAsmBackendDarwin/g
s/ARMWinCOFFAsmBackend/ARMAsmBackendWinCOFF/g
s/ELFARMAsmBackend/ARMAsmBackendELF/g
Finally, clang-format has been run across ARMAsmBackend.cpp
llvm-svn: 217866
