This patch teaches the SDag type legalizer how to split up debug info for
integer values that are split into a hi and lo part.
(re-commit)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36805
llvm-svn: 311181
This patch teaches the SDag type legalizer how to split up debug info for
integer values that are split into a hi and lo part.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36805
llvm-svn: 311102
The SelectionDAGBuilder translates various conditional branches into
CaseBlocks which are then translated into SDNodes. If a conditional
branch results in multiple CaseBlocks only the first CaseBlock is
translated into SDNodes immediately, the rest of the CaseBlocks are
put in a queue and processed when all LLVM IR instructions in the
basic block have been processed.
When a CaseBlock is transformed into SDNodes the SelectionDAGBuilder
is queried for the current LLVM IR instruction and the resulting
SDNodes are annotated with the debug info of the current
instruction (if it exists and has debug metadata).
When the deferred CaseBlocks are processed, the SelectionDAGBuilder
does not have a current LLVM IR instruction, and the resulting SDNodes
will not have any debuginfo. As DwarfDebug::beginInstruction() outputs
a .loc directive for the first instruction in a labeled
block (typically the case for something coming from a CaseBlock) this
tends to produce a line-0 directive.
This patch changes the handling of CaseBlocks to store the current
instruction's debug info into the CaseBlock when it is created (and the
SelectionDAGBuilder knows the current instruction) and to always use
the stored debug info when translating a CaseBlock to SDNodes.
Patch by Frej Drejhammar!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36671
llvm-svn: 311097
When v1i1 is legal (e.g. AVX512) the legalizer can reach
a case where a v1i1 SETCC with an illgeal vector type operand
wasn't scalarized (since v1i1 is legal) but its operands does
have to be scalarized. This used to assert because SETCC was
missing from the vector operand scalarizer.
This patch attemps to teach the legalizer to handle these cases
by scalazring the operands, converting the node into a scalar
SETCC node.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36651
llvm-svn: 311071
Summary: It is creating useless work as the commuted nodes is the same as the node we are working on in that case.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33840
llvm-svn: 310832
into vextract(vNiX,Idx) when creating vextract with getNode().
This case appeared in AVX512 after fixing pr33349 in r310552.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36571
llvm-svn: 310828
Summary:
Without the SrcVT its hard to know what is really being asked for. For example if your target has 128, 256, and 512 bit vectors. Maybe extracting 128 from 256 is cheap, but maybe extracting 128 from 512 is not.
For x86 we do support extracting a quarter of a 512-bit register. But for i1 vectors we don't have isel patterns for extracting arbitrary pieces. So we need this to have a correct implementation of isExtractSubvectorCheap for mask vectors.
Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, efriedma
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: aemerson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36649
llvm-svn: 310793
If all the operands of a BUILD_VECTOR extract elements from same vector then split the vector efficiently based on the maximum vector access index.
Reapplied with fix to only work with simple value types.
Committed on behalf of @jbhateja (Jatin Bhateja)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35788
llvm-svn: 310782
The previous rev (r310208) failed to account for overflow when subtracting the
constants to see if they're suitable for shift/lea. This version add a check
for that and more test were added in r310490.
We can convert any select-of-constants to math ops:
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/d7d
For this patch, I'm enhancing an existing x86 transform that uses fake multiplies
(they always become shl/lea) to avoid cmov or branching. The current code misses
cases where we have a negative constant and a positive constant, so this is just
trying to plug that hole.
The DAGCombiner diff prevents us from hitting a terrible inefficiency: we can start
with a select in IR, create a select DAG node, convert it into a sext, convert it
back into a select, and then lower it to sext machine code.
Some notes about the test diffs:
1. 2010-08-04-MaskedSignedCompare.ll - We were creating control flow that didn't exist in the IR.
2. memcmp.ll - Choose -1 or 1 is the case that got me looking at this again. We could avoid the
push/pop in some cases if we used 'movzbl %al' instead of an xor on a different reg? That's a
post-DAG problem though.
3. mul-constant-result.ll - The trade-off between sbb+not vs. setne+neg could be addressed if
that's a regression, but those would always be nearly equivalent.
4. pr22338.ll and sext-i1.ll - These tests have undef operands, so we don't actually care about these diffs.
5. sbb.ll - This shows a win for what is likely a common case: choose -1 or 0.
6. select.ll - There's another borderline case here: cmp+sbb+or vs. test+set+lea? Also, sbb+not vs. setae+neg shows up again.
7. select_const.ll - These are motivating cases for the enhancement; replace cmov with cheaper ops.
Assembly differences between movzbl and xor to avoid a partial reg stall are caused later by the X86 Fixup SetCC pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35340
llvm-svn: 310717
Move store merge to happen after intrinsic lowering to allow lowered
stores to be merged.
Some regressions due in MergeConsecutiveStores to missing
insert_subvector that are addressed in follow up patch.
Reviewers: craig.topper, efriedma, RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34559
llvm-svn: 310710
rL310372 enabled simplifyShuffleMask to support undef shuffle mask inputs, but its causing hangs.
Removing support until I can triage the problem
llvm-svn: 310699
Summary:
Preserve chain dependecies between old and new loads constructed to
prevent loads from reordering below later stores.
Fixes PR34088.
Reviewers: craig.topper, spatel, RKSimon, efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36528
llvm-svn: 310604
In FoldConstantArithmetic, handle BUILD_VECTOR nodes that do implicit truncation on the elements.
This is similar to what is done in FoldConstantVectorArithmetic.
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36506
llvm-svn: 310593
a legal cond operand.
When scalarizing the result of a vselect, the legalizer currently expects
to already have scalarized the operands. While this is true for the true/false
operands (which have the same type as the result), it is not case for the
condition operand. On X86 AVX512, v1i1 is legal - this leads to operations such
as '< N x type> vselect < N x i1> < N x type> < N x type>' where < N x type > is
illegal to hit an assertion during the scalarization.
The handling is similar to r205625.
This also exposes the fact that (v1i1 extract_subvector) should be legal
and selectable on AVX512 - We do this by custom lowering to vector_extract_elt.
This still leaves us in some cases with redundant dag nodes which will be
combined in a separate soon to come patch.
This fixes pr33349.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36511
llvm-svn: 310552
Relanding after case to insert explicit truncation as necessary.
Allow SCALAR_TO_VECTOR of EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT to reduce to
EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR of vector shuffle when output is smaller. Marginally
improves vector shuffle computations.
Reviewers: efriedma, RKSimon, spatel
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35566
llvm-svn: 310256
The NewNodesMustHaveLegalTypes flag is set to false at the beginning of CodeGenAndEmitDAG, and set to true after legalizing types.
But before calling CodeGenAndEmitDAG we build the DAG for the basic block.
So for the first basic block NewNodesMustHaveLegalTypes would be 'false' during the SDAG building, and for all other basic blocks it would be 'true'.
This patch sets the flag to false before SDAG building each basic block.
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33435
llvm-svn: 310239
We can convert any select-of-constants to math ops:
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/d7d
For this patch, I'm enhancing an existing x86 transform that uses fake multiplies
(they always become shl/lea) to avoid cmov or branching. The current code misses
cases where we have a negative constant and a positive constant, so this is just
trying to plug that hole.
The DAGCombiner diff prevents us from hitting a terrible inefficiency: we can start
with a select in IR, create a select DAG node, convert it into a sext, convert it
back into a select, and then lower it to sext machine code.
Some notes about the test diffs:
1. 2010-08-04-MaskedSignedCompare.ll - We were creating control flow that didn't exist in the IR.
2. memcmp.ll - Choose -1 or 1 is the case that got me looking at this again. I
think we could avoid the push/pop in some cases if we used 'movzbl %al' instead of an xor on
a different reg? That's a post-DAG problem though.
3. mul-constant-result.ll - The trade-off between sbb+not vs. setne+neg could be addressed if
that's a regression, but I think those would always be nearly equivalent.
4. pr22338.ll and sext-i1.ll - These tests have undef operands, so I don't think we actually care about these diffs.
5. sbb.ll - This shows a win for what I think is a common case: choose -1 or 0.
6. select.ll - There's another borderline case here: cmp+sbb+or vs. test+set+lea? Also, sbb+not vs. setae+neg shows up again.
7. select_const.ll - These are motivating cases for the enhancement; replace cmov with cheaper ops.
Assembly differences between movzbl and xor to avoid a partial reg stall are caused later by the X86 Fixup SetCC pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35340
llvm-svn: 310208
If all the operands of a BUILD_VECTOR extract elements from same vector then split the vector efficiently based on the maximum vector access index.
Committed on behalf of @jbhateja (Jatin Bhateja)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35788
llvm-svn: 310058
During store merge we construct a sorted list of consecutive store
candidates and consider subsequences for merging into a single
store. For each subsequence we check if the stored value type is legal
the merged store would have valid and fast and if the constructed
value to be stored is valid. The only properties that affect this
check between subsequences is the size of the subsequence, the
alignment of the first store, the alignment of the stored load value
(when merging stores-of-loads), and whether the merged value is a
constant zero.
If we do not find a viable mergeable subsequence starting from the
first store of length N, we know that a subsequence starting at a
later store of length N will also fail unless the new store's
alignment, the new load's alignment (if we're merging store-of-loads),
or we've dropped stores of nonzero value and could construct a merged
stores of zero (for merging constants).
As a result if we fail to find a valid subsequence starting from the
first store we can safely skip considering subsequences that start
with subsequent stores unless one of the above properties is
true. This significantly (2x) improves compile time in some
pathological cases.
Reviewers: RKSimon, efriedma, zvi, spatel, waltl
Subscribers: grandinj, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35901
llvm-svn: 309830
This pattern shows up when lowering byval copies on AMDGPU.
The byval object access is split into 4-byte chunks, adding a
constant offset to the FixedStack base. When some of the offsets
turn into ors, this prevents combining the constant offsets.
This makes it not apparent that the object is there when matching
addressing modes, so it ends up using a scratch wave offset
relative access and the lengthy frame index expansion for that.
llvm-svn: 309775
Summary:
We already have information about static alloca stack locations in our
side table. Emitting instructions for them is inefficient, and it only
happens when the address of the alloca has been materialized within the
current block, which isn't often.
Reviewers: aprantl, probinson, dblaikie
Subscribers: jfb, dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, llvm-commits, aheejin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36117
llvm-svn: 309729
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31536 didn't really solve the problem it was
trying to solve; it got rid of the assertion failure, but we were still
scheduling the DAG incorrectly (mixing together instructions from
different calls), leading to a MachineVerifier failure.
In order to schedule the DAG correctly, we have to make sure we don't
schedule a node which should be blocked by an interference. Fix
ScheduleDAGRRList::PickNodeToScheduleBottomUp so it doesn't pick a node
like that.
The added call to FindAvailableNode() is the key change here; this makes
sure we don't try to schedule a call while we're in the middle of
scheduling a different call. I'm not sure this is the right approach; in
particular, I'm not sure how to prove we don't end up with an infinite
loop of repeatedly backtracking.
This also reverts the code change from D31536. It doesn't do anything
useful: we should never schedule an ADJCALLSTACKDOWN unless we've
already scheduled the corresponding ADJCALLSTACKUP.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33818
llvm-svn: 309642
