This has been causing the prologue_end to be incorrectly positioned.
Patch by Vladimir Radosavljevic.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11293
llvm-svn: 246309
Summary:
This patch remaps the assembly idiom 'move' to 'or' instead of 'daddu' or
'addu'. The use of addu/daddu instead of or as move was highlighted as a
performance issue during the analysis of a recent 64bit design. Originally
move was encoded as 'or' by binutils but was changed for the r10k cpu family
due to their pipeline which had 2 arithmetic units and a single logical unit,
and so could issue multiple (d)addu based moves at the same time but only 1
logical move.
This patch preserves the disassembly behaviour so that disassembling a old style
(d)addu move still appears as move, but assembling move always gives an or
Patch by Simon Dardis.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11796
llvm-svn: 244579
This changes TargetFrameLowering::processFunctionBeforeCalleeSavedScan():
- Rename the function to determineCalleeSaves()
- Pass a bitset of callee saved registers by reference, thus avoiding
the function-global PhysRegUsed bitset in MachineRegisterInfo.
- Without PhysRegUsed the implementation is fine tuned to not save
physcial registers which are only read but never modified.
Related to rdar://21539507
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10909
llvm-svn: 242165
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
Summary:
With this change we are able to realign the stack dynamically, whenever it
contains objects with alignment requirements that are larger than the
alignment specified from the given ABI.
We have to use the $fp register as the frame pointer when we perform
dynamic stack realignment. In complex stack frames, with variably-sized
objects, we reserve additionally the callee-saved register $s7 as the
base pointer in order to reference locals.
Reviewers: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8633
llvm-svn: 238829
This patch introduces a new pass that computes the safe point to insert the
prologue and epilogue of the function.
The interest is to find safe points that are cheaper than the entry and exits
blocks.
As an example and to avoid regressions to be introduce, this patch also
implements the required bits to enable the shrink-wrapping pass for AArch64.
** Context **
Currently we insert the prologue and epilogue of the method/function in the
entry and exits blocks. Although this is correct, we can do a better job when
those are not immediately required and insert them at less frequently executed
places.
The job of the shrink-wrapping pass is to identify such places.
** Motivating example **
Let us consider the following function that perform a call only in one branch of
a if:
define i32 @f(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
%tmp = alloca i32, align 4
%tmp2 = icmp slt i32 %a, %b
br i1 %tmp2, label %true, label %false
true:
store i32 %a, i32* %tmp, align 4
%tmp4 = call i32 @doSomething(i32 0, i32* %tmp)
br label %false
false:
%tmp.0 = phi i32 [ %tmp4, %true ], [ %a, %0 ]
ret i32 %tmp.0
}
On AArch64 this code generates (removing the cfi directives to ease
readabilities):
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
LBB0_2: ; %false
mov sp, x29
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
ret
With shrink-wrapping we could generate:
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
add sp, x29, #16 ; =16
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
LBB0_2: ; %false
ret
Therefore, we would pay the overhead of setting up/destroying the frame only if
we actually do the call.
** Proposed Solution **
This patch introduces a new machine pass that perform the shrink-wrapping
analysis (See the comments at the beginning of ShrinkWrap.cpp for more details).
It then stores the safe save and restore point into the MachineFrameInfo
attached to the MachineFunction.
This information is then used by the PrologEpilogInserter (PEI) to place the
related code at the right place. This pass runs right before the PEI.
Unlike the original paper of Chow from PLDI’88, this implementation of
shrink-wrapping does not use expensive data-flow analysis and does not need hack
to properly avoid frequently executed point. Instead, it relies on dominance and
loop properties.
The pass is off by default and each target can opt-in by setting the
EnableShrinkWrap boolean to true in their derived class of TargetPassConfig.
This setting can also be overwritten on the command line by using
-enable-shrink-wrap.
Before you try out the pass for your target, make sure you properly fix your
emitProlog/emitEpilog/adjustForXXX method to cope with basic blocks that are not
necessarily the entry block.
** Design Decisions **
1. ShrinkWrap is its own pass right now. It could frankly be merged into PEI but
for debugging and clarity I thought it was best to have its own file.
2. Right now, we only support one save point and one restore point. At some
point we can expand this to several save point and restore point, the impacted
component would then be:
- The pass itself: New algorithm needed.
- MachineFrameInfo: Hold a list or set of Save/Restore point instead of one
pointer.
- PEI: Should loop over the save point and restore point.
Anyhow, at least for this first iteration, I do not believe this is interesting
to support the complex cases. We should revisit that when we motivating
examples.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9210
<rdar://problem/3201744>
llvm-svn: 236507
Summary:
For example, a common idiom was 'isN64 ? Mips::SP_64 : Mips::SP'. This has
been moved to MipsABIInfo and replaced with 'ABI.GetStackPtr()'.
There are others that should also be moved. This patch sticks to the ones that
are obviously non-functional. The others have minor mistakes that need fixing
at the same time, mostly involving checks for 64-bit GPR's instead of checks
for 64-bit pointers.
Reviewers: tomatabacu
Reviewed By: tomatabacu
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8972
llvm-svn: 235173
Summary:
Avoid duplicate code in Mips16FrameLowering and MipsSEFrameLowering by
providing an implementation of the eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr()
function from their base class.
Depends on D8640.
Reviewers: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8641
llvm-svn: 233909
Summary:
adjustStackPtr() is implemented from both MipsSEInstrInfo and
Mips16InstrInfo. It makes sense to expose this function from
MipsInstrInfo and avoid explicit casting in some cases.
Depends on D8638.
Reviewers: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8640
llvm-svn: 233905
calls that don't take a Function argument from Mips. Notable
exceptions: the AsmPrinter and MipsTargetObjectFile. The
latter needs to be fixed, and the former will be fixed when the
general AsmPrinter changes happen.
llvm-svn: 227512
Summary:
In order to support big endian targets for the BuildPairF64 nodes we
just need to swap the low/high pair registers. Additionally, for the
ExtractElementF64 nodes we have to calculate the correct stack offset
with respect to the node's register/operand that we want to extract.
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5753
llvm-svn: 219931
shorter/easier and have the DAG use that to do the same lookup. This
can be used in the future for TargetMachine based caching lookups from
the MachineFunction easily.
Update the MIPS subtarget switching machinery to update this pointer
at the same time it runs.
llvm-svn: 214838
Summary:
This is because the FP64A the hardware will redirect 32-bit reads/writes
from/to odd-numbered registers to the upper 32-bits of the corresponding
even register. In effect, simulating FR=0 mode when FR=0 mode is not
available.
Unfortunately, we have to make the decision to avoid mfc1/mtc1 before
register allocation so we currently do this for even registers too.
FPXX has a similar requirement on 32-bit architectures that lack
mfhc1/mthc1 so this patch also handles the affected moves from the FPU for
FPXX too. Moves to the FPU were supported by an earlier commit.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4484
llvm-svn: 212938
enabled and mthc1 and dmtc1 are not available (e.g. on MIPS32r1)
This prevents the upper 32-bits of a double precision value from being moved to
the FPU with mtc1 to an odd-numbered FPU register. This is necessary to ensure
that the code generated executes correctly regardless of the current FPU mode.
MIPS32r2 and above continues to use mtc1/mthc1, while MIPS-IV and above continue
to use dmtc1.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4465
llvm-svn: 212930
The old system was fairly convoluted:
* A temporary label was created.
* A single PROLOG_LABEL was created with it.
* A few MCCFIInstructions were created with the same label.
The semantics were that the cfi instructions were mapped to the PROLOG_LABEL
via the temporary label. The output position was that of the PROLOG_LABEL.
The temporary label itself was used only for doing the mapping.
The new CFI_INSTRUCTION has a 1:1 mapping to MCCFIInstructions and points to
one by holding an index into the CFI instructions of this function.
I did consider removing MMI.getFrameInstructions completelly and having
CFI_INSTRUCTION own a MCCFIInstruction, but MCCFIInstructions have non
trivial constructors and destructors and are somewhat big, so the this setup
is probably better.
The net result is that we don't create temporary labels that are never used.
llvm-svn: 203204
accumulator instead of its sub-registers, $hi and $lo.
We need this change to prevent a mflo following a mtlo from reading an
unpredictable/undefined value, as shown in the following example:
mult $6, $7 // result of $6 * $7 is written to $lo and $hi.
mflo $2 // read lower 32-bit result from $lo.
mtlo $4 // write to $lo. the content of $hi becomes unpredictable.
mfhi $3 // read higher 32-bit from $hi, which has an unpredictable value.
I don't have a test case for this change that reliably reproduces the problem.
llvm-svn: 192119
point registers. We will need this register class later when we add
definitions for instructions mfhc1 and mthc1. Also, remove sub-register indices
sub_fpeven and sub_fpodd and use sub_lo and sub_hi instead.
llvm-svn: 188842
load/store instructions defined. Previously, we were defining load/store
instructions for each pointer size (32 and 64-bit), but now we need just one
definition.
llvm-svn: 188830
register.
- Define pseudo instructions which store or load ccond field of the DSP
control register.
- Emit the pseudos in MipsSEInstrInfo::storeRegToStack and loadRegFromStack.
- Expand the pseudos before callee-scan save.
- Emit instructions RDDSP or WRDSP to copy between ccond field and GPRs.
llvm-svn: 180969
Expand copy instructions between two accumulator registers before callee-saved
scan is done. Handle copies between integer GPR and hi/lo registers in
MipsSEInstrInfo::copyPhysReg. Delete pseudo-copy instructions that are not
needed.
llvm-svn: 180827
This patch lets the register scavenger make use of multiple spill slots in
order to guarantee that it will be able to provide multiple registers
simultaneously.
To support this, the RS's API has changed slightly: setScavengingFrameIndex /
getScavengingFrameIndex have been replaced by addScavengingFrameIndex /
isScavengingFrameIndex / getScavengingFrameIndices.
In forthcoming commits, the PowerPC backend will use this capability in order
to implement the spilling of condition registers, and some special-purpose
registers, without relying on r0 being reserved. In some cases, spilling these
registers requires two GPRs: one for addressing and one to hold the value being
transferred.
llvm-svn: 177774
to TargetFrameLowering, where it belongs. Incidentally, this allows us
to delete some duplicated (and slightly different!) code in TRI.
There are potentially other layering problems that can be cleaned up
as a result, or in a similar manner.
The refactoring was OK'd by Anton Korobeynikov on llvmdev.
Note: this touches the target interfaces, so out-of-tree targets may
be affected.
llvm-svn: 175788
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
instructions that decrement and increment the stack pointer before and after a
call when the function does not have a reserved call frame.
llvm-svn: 161093
MipsSEFrameLowering.
Implement MipsSEFrameLowering::hasReservedCallFrame. Call frames will not be
reserved if there is a call with a large call frame or there are variable sized
objects on the stack.
llvm-svn: 161090
