The hardware div feature refers only to Thumb, but because of its name
it is tempting to use it to check for hardware division in general,
which may cause problems in ARM mode. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D32005.
This patch adds "Thumb" to its name, to make its scope clear. One
notable place where I haven't made the change is in the feature flag
(used with -mattr), which is still hwdiv. Changing it would also require
changes in a lot of tests, including clang tests, and it doesn't seem
like it's worth the effort.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32160
llvm-svn: 300827
Summary:
Host CPU detection now supports Kryo, so we need to recognize it in ARM
target.
Reviewers: mcrosier, t.p.northover, rengolin, echristo, srhines
Reviewed By: t.p.northover, echristo
Subscribers: aemerson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31775
llvm-svn: 299674
Summary:
To support negative immediates for certain arithmetic instructions, the
instruction is converted to the inverse instruction with a negated (or inverted)
immediate. For example, "ADD r0, r1, #FFFFFFFF" cannot be encoded as an ADD
instruction. However, "SUB r0, r1, #1" is equivalent.
These conversions are different from instruction aliases. An alias maps
several assembler instructions onto one encoding. A conversion, however, maps
an *invalid* instruction--e.g. with an immediate that cannot be represented in
the encoding--to a different (but equivalent) instruction.
Several instructions with negative immediates were being converted already, but
this was not systematically tested, nor did it cover all instructions.
This patch implements all possible substitutions for ARM, Thumb1 and
Thumb2 assembler and adds tests. It also adds a feature flag
(-mattr=+no-neg-immediates) to turn these substitutions off. This is
helpful for users who want their code to assemble to exactly what they
wrote.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, rovka, samparker, javed.absar, peter.smith, rengolin
Reviewed By: javed.absar
Subscribers: aadg, aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30571
llvm-svn: 298380
Removed the HasT2ExtractPack feature and replaced its references
with HasDSP. This then allows the Thumb2 extend instructions to be
selected for ARMv8M +dsp. These instruction descriptions have also
been refactored and more target tests have been added for their isel.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29623
llvm-svn: 295452
Gcc supports target armv7ve which is armv7-a with virtualization
extensions. This change adds support for this in llvm for gcc
compatibility.
Also remove redundant FeatureHWDiv, FeatureHWDivARM for a few models as
this is specified automatically by FeatureVirtualization.
Patch by Manoj Gupta.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29472
llvm-svn: 294661
This implements execute-only support for ARM code generation, which
prevents the compiler from generating data accesses to code sections.
The following changes are involved:
* Add the CodeGen option "-arm-execute-only" to the ARM code generator.
* Add the clang flag "-mexecute-only" as well as the GCC-compatible
alias "-mpure-code" to enable this option.
* When enabled, literal pools are replaced with MOVW/MOVT instructions,
with VMOV used in addition for floating-point literals. As the MOVT
instruction is required, execute-only support is only available in
Thumb mode for targets supporting ARMv8-M baseline or Thumb2.
* Jump tables are placed in data sections when in execute-only mode.
* The execute-only text section is assigned section ID 0, and is
marked as unreadable with the SHF_ARM_PURECODE flag with symbol 'y'.
This also overrides selection of ELF sections for globals.
llvm-svn: 289784
This patch assigns cost of the scaling used in addressing.
On many ARM cores, a negated register offset takes longer than a
non-negated register offset, in a register-offset addressing mode.
For instance:
LDR R0, [R1, R2 LSL #2]
LDR R0, [R1, -R2 LSL #2]
Above, (1) takes less cycles than (2).
By assigning appropriate scaling factor cost, we enable the LLVM
to make the right trade-offs in the optimization and code-selection phase.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D24857
Reviewers: jmolloy, rengolin
llvm-svn: 284127
Reverts r283938 to reinstate r283867 with a fix.
The original change had an ArrayRef referring to a destroyed temporary
initializer list. Use plain C arrays instead.
llvm-svn: 283942
The high registers are not allocatable in Thumb1 functions, but they
could still be used by inline assembly, so we need to save and restore
the callee-saved high registers (r8-r11) in the prologue and epilogue.
This is complicated by the fact that the Thumb1 push and pop
instructions cannot access these registers. Therefore, we have to move
them down into low registers before pushing, and move them back after
popping into low registers.
In most functions, we will have low registers that are also being
pushed/popped, which we can use as the temporary registers for
saving/restoring the high registers. However, this is not guaranteed, so
we may need to push some extra low registers to ensure that the high
registers can be saved/restored. For correctness, it would be sufficient
to use just one low register, but if we have enough low registers
available then we only need one push/pop instruction, rather than one
per high register.
We can also use the argument/return registers when they are not live,
and the link register when saving (but not restoring), reducing the
number of extra registers we need to push.
There are still a few extreme edge cases where we need two push/pop
instructions, because not enough low registers can be made live in the
prologue or epilogue.
In addition to the regression tests included here, I've also tested this
using a script to generate functions which clobber different
combinations of registers, have different numbers of argument and return
registers (including variadic arguments), allocate different fixed sized
objects on the stack, and do or don't use variable sized allocas and the
__builtin_return_address intrinsic (all of which affect the available
registers in the prologue and epilogue). I ran these functions in a test
harness which verifies that all of the callee-saved registers are
correctly preserved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24228
llvm-svn: 283867
This is a port of XRay to ARM 32-bit, without Thumb support yet. The XRay instrumentation support is moving up to AsmPrinter.
This is one of 3 commits to different repositories of XRay ARM port. The other 2 are:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23932 (Clang test)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23933 (compiler-rt)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23931
llvm-svn: 281878
And associated commits, as they broke the Thumb bots.
This reverts commit r280935.
This reverts commit r280891.
This reverts commit r280888.
llvm-svn: 280967
This is a port of XRay to ARM 32-bit, without Thumb support yet. The XRay instrumentation support is moving up to AsmPrinter.
This is one of 3 commits to different repositories of XRay ARM port. The other 2 are:
1. https://reviews.llvm.org/D23932 (Clang test)
2. https://reviews.llvm.org/D23933 (compiler-rt)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23931
llvm-svn: 280888
There is not an official documented ABI for frame pointers in Thumb2,
but we should try to emit something which is useful.
We use r7 as the frame pointer for Thumb code, which currently means
that if a function needs to save a high register (r8-r11), it will get
pushed to the stack between the frame pointer (r7) and link register
(r14). This means that while a stack unwinder can follow the chain of
frame pointers up the stack, it cannot know the offset to lr, so does
not know which functions correspond to the stack frames.
To fix this, we need to push the callee-saved registers in two batches,
with the first push saving the low registers, fp and lr, and the second
push saving the high registers. This is already implemented, but
previously only used for iOS. This patch turns it on for all Thumb2
targets when frame pointers are required by the ABI, and the frame
pointer is r7 (Windows uses r11, so this isn't a problem there). If
frame pointer elimination is enabled we still emit a single push/pop
even if we need a frame pointer for other reasons, to avoid increasing
code size.
We must also ensure that lr is pushed to the stack when using a frame
pointer, so that we end up with a complete frame record. Situations that
could cause this were rare, because we already push lr in most
situations so that we can return using the pop instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23516
llvm-svn: 279506
This patch adds support for some new relocation models to the ARM
backend:
* Read-only position independence (ROPI): Code and read-only data is accessed
PC-relative. The offsets between all code and RO data sections are known at
static link time. This does not affect read-write data.
* Read-write position independence (RWPI): Read-write data is accessed relative
to the static base register (r9). The offsets between all writeable data
sections are known at static link time. This does not affect read-only data.
These two modes are independent (they specify how different objects
should be addressed), so they can be used individually or together. They
are otherwise the same as the "static" relocation model, and are not
compatible with SysV-style PIC using a global offset table.
These modes are normally used by bare-metal systems or systems with
small real-time operating systems. They are designed to avoid the need
for a dynamic linker, the only initialisation required is setting r9 to
an appropriate value for RWPI code.
I have only added support to SelectionDAG, not FastISel, because
FastISel is currently disabled for bare-metal targets where these modes
would be used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23195
llvm-svn: 278015
This is a follow-up for r273544.
The end goal is to get rid of the isSwift / isCortexXY / isWhatever methods.
This commit also removes a command line flag that isn't used in any of the tests:
check-vmlx-hazards. It can be replaced easily with the mattr mechanism, since
this is now a subtarget feature.
There is still some work left regarding FeatureExpandMLx. In the past MLx
expansion was enabled for subtargets with hasVFP2(), until r129775 [1] switched
from that to isCortexA9, without too much justification.
In spite of that, the code performing MLx expansion still contains calls to
isSwift/isLikeA9, although the results of those are pretty clear given that
we're only enabling it for the A9.
We should try to enable it for all targets that have FeatureHasVMLxHazards, as
it seems to be closely related to that behaviour, and if that is possible try to
clean up the MLx expansion pass from all calls to isWhatever. This will require
some performance testing, so it will be done in another patch.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20110418/119725.html
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21798
llvm-svn: 274742
This is a follow-up for r273544.
The end goal is to get rid of the isSwift / isCortexXY / isWhatever methods.
This commit also removes two command-line flags that weren't used in any of the
tests: widen-vmovs and swift-partial-update-clearance. The former may be easily
replaced with the mattr mechanism, but the latter may not (as it is a subtarget
property, and not a proper feature).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21797
llvm-svn: 274620
This is a follow-up for r273544 and r273853.
The end goal is to get rid of the isSwift / isCortexXY / isWhatever methods.
This commit also marks them as obsolete.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21796
llvm-svn: 274616
This is a follow-up for r273544.
The end goal is to get rid of the isSwift / isCortexXY / isWhatever methods.
Since the ARM backend seems to have quite a lot of calls to these methods, I
intend to submit 5-6 subtarget features at a time, instead of one big lump.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21685
llvm-svn: 273853
This is a cleanup commit similar to r271555, but for ARM.
The end goal is to get rid of the isSwift / isCortexXY / isWhatever methods.
Since the ARM backend seems to have quite a lot of calls to these methods, I
intend to submit 5-6 subtarget features at a time, instead of one big lump.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21432
llvm-svn: 273544
new instruction to ARM and AArch64 targets and several system registers.
Patch by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez and Oliver Stannard
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20282
llvm-svn: 271670
When setting the frame pointer, the offset from SP is calculated based on the
stack slot it gets allocated, but this slot is in turn based on the order of
the CSR list so that list should match the order we actually save the registers
in. Mostly it did, but in the edge-case of MachO AAPCS targets it was wrong.
llvm-svn: 269459
Various bits we want to use the new ABI actually compile with "-arch armv7k
-miphoneos-version-min=9.0". Not ideal, but also not ridiculous given how
slices work.
llvm-svn: 258975
This patch was originally committed as r257883, but was reverted due to windows
failures. The cause of these failures has been fixed under r258677, hence
re-committing the original patch.
llvm-svn: 258681
Add ARMv8.2-A to TargetParser, so that it can be used by the clang
command-line options and the .arch directive.
Most testing of this will be done in clang, checking that the
command-line options that this enables work.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15037
llvm-svn: 254400
This adds subtarget features for ARMv8.2-A, which builds on (and
requires the features from) ARMv8.1-A. Most assembler-visible features
of ARMv8.2-A are system instructions, and are all required parts of the
architecture, so just depend on the HasV8_2aOps subtarget feature.
There is also one large, optional feature, which adds 16-bit floating
point versions of all existing floating-point instructions (VFP and
SIMD), this is represented by the FeatureFullFP16 subtarget feature.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15036
llvm-svn: 254399
Summary:
* ARMv6KZ is the "canonical" name, given in the ARMARM
* ARMv6Z is an "official abbreviation" for it, mentioned in the ARMARM
* ARMv6ZK is a popular misspelling, which we should support as an alias.
The patch corrects the handling of the names.
Functional changes:
* ARMv6Z no longer treated as an architecture in its own right
* ARMv6ZK renamed to ARMv6KZ, accepting ARMv6ZK as an alias
* arm1176jz-s and arm1176jzf-s recognized as ARMv6ZK, instead of ARMv6K
* default ARMv6K CPU changed to arm1176j-s
Reviewers: rengolin, logan, compnerd
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14568
llvm-svn: 253206
This allows for accurate architecture targeting as well as removing
duplicate information (hardcoded feature strings) from MCTargetDesc.
llvm-svn: 253196
"GCC requires the freestanding environment provide memcpy, memmove, memset
and memcmp": https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-5.2.0/gcc/Standards.html
Hence in GNUEABI targets LLVM should not convert 'memops' to their equivalent
'__aeabi_memops'. This convertion violates GCC contract.
The -meabi flag controls whether or not LLVM will modify 'memops' in GNUEABI
targets.
Without -meabi: use the triple default EABI.
With -meabi=default: use the triple default EABI.
With -meabi=gnu: use 'memops'.
With -meabi=4 or -meabi=5: use '__aeabi_memops'.
With -meabi set to an unknown value: same as -meabi=default.
Patch by Vinicius Tinti.
llvm-svn: 252462
