(and hopefully on Windows). The bots have been down most of the day
because of this, and it's not clear to me what all will be required to
fix it.
The commits started with r153205, then r153207, r153208, and r153221.
The first commit seems to be the real culprit, but I couldn't revert
a smaller number of patches.
When resubmitting, r153207 and r153208 should be folded into r153205,
they were simple build fixes.
llvm-svn: 153241
execution-time regression for nsieve-bits on the ARMv7 -O0 -g nightly tester.
This may also improve compile-time on architectures that would otherwise
generate a libcall for urem (e.g., ARM) or fall back to the DAG selector.
rdar://10810716
llvm-svn: 153230
These changes allow us to compile big endian from the command line for 32 bit
Mips targets. This patch will result in code and data actually being produced
in the correct endianess.
llvm-svn: 153153
Do not call SplitBlockPredecessors on a loop preheader when one of the
predecessors is an indirectbr. Otherwise, you will hit this assert:
!isa<IndirectBrInst>(Preds[i]->getTerminator()) && "Cannot split an edge from an IndirectBrInst"
llvm-svn: 153134
instead of skipping the current loop.
My prior fix was incomplete because of an overzealous compile-time optimization:
Better fix for: <rdar://problem/11049788> Segmentation fault: 11 in LoopStrengthReduce
llvm-svn: 153131
This results in things such as
vmovups 16(%rdi), %xmm0
vinsertf128 $1, %xmm0, %ymm0, %ymm0
to be combined to
vinsertf128 $1, 16(%rdi), %ymm0, %ymm0
rdar://11076953
llvm-svn: 153092
i128). In that case, we may not be able to print out the MCExpr as an
expression. For instance, we could have an MCExpr like this:
0xBEEF0000BEEF0000 | (0xBEEF0000BEEF0000 << 64)
The MCExpr printer handles sizes up to 64-bits, but this expression would
require 128-bits. In this situation, try to evaluate the constant expression and
emit that as the value into 64-bit chunks.
<rdar://problem/11070338>
llvm-svn: 153081
X86InstrCompiler.td.
It also adds –mcpu-generic to the legalize-shift-64.ll test so the test
will pass if run on an Intel Atom CPU, which would otherwise
produce an instruction schedule which differs from that which the test expects.
llvm-svn: 153033
It's not a good style idea, as the registers will be laid down in memory in
numerical order, not the order they're in the list, but it's legal. vldm/vstm
are stricter.
rdar://11064740
llvm-svn: 152943
alignment. If that's the case, then we want to make sure that we don't increase
the alignment of the store instruction. Because if we increase it to be "more
aligned" than the pointer, code-gen may use instructions which require a greater
alignment than the pointer guarantees.
<rdar://problem/11043589>
llvm-svn: 152907
It was added in 2007 as the first cut at supporting no-inline
attributes, but we didn't have function attributes of any form at the
time. However, it was added without any mention in the LangRef or other
documentation.
Later on, in 2008, Devang added function notes for 'inline=never' and
then turned them into proper function attributes. From that point
onward, as far as I can tell, the world moved on, and no one has touched
'llvm.noinline' in any meaningful way since.
It's time has now come. We have had better mechanisms for doing this for
a long time, all the frontends I'm aware of use them, and this is just
holding back progress. Given that it was never a documented feature of
the IR, I've provided no auto-upgrade support. If people know of real,
in-the-wild bitcode that relies on this, yell at me and I'll add it, but
I *seriously* doubt anyone cares.
llvm-svn: 152904
Only record IVUsers that are dominated by simplified loop
headers. Otherwise SCEVExpander will crash while looking for a
preheader.
I previously tried to work around this in LSR itself, but that was
insufficient. This way, LSR can continue to run if some uses are not
in simple loops, as long as we don't attempt to analyze those users.
Fixes <rdar://problem/11049788> Segmentation fault: 11 in LoopStrengthReduce
llvm-svn: 152892
