Summary: I think it would be better to require the alignment to be >= 1. It is currently confusing to allow both values.
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77372
Summary:
Add new generic MIR opcodes G_SADDSAT etc. Add support in IRTranslator
for translating the saturating add/subtract intrinsics to the new
opcodes.
Reviewers: aemerson, dsanders, paquette, arsenm
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, hiraditya, volkan, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76600
It looks like I pushed an older version of this commit without the review
fixups earlier. This applies the review changes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69545
Summary:
Rework the GMIR documentation to focus more on the end user than the
implementation and tie it in to the MIR document. There was also some
out-of-date information which has been removed.
The quality of the GenericOpcode reference is highly variable and drops
sharply as I worked through them all but we've got to start somewhere :-).
It would be great if others could expand on this too as there is an awful
lot to get through.
Also fix a typo in the definition of G_FLOG. Previously, the comments said
we had two base-2's (G_FLOG and G_FLOG2).
Reviewers: aemerson, volkan, rovka, arsenm
Reviewed By: rovka
Subscribers: wdng, arphaman, jfb, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69545
Summary:
This is largely based off of the slides from the keynote
Depends on D69545
Reviewers: volkan, rovka, arsenm
Subscribers: wdng, arphaman, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69644
The legalizer page was in a fairly good state. I've mostly just inlined
some information as a note and removed a reference to potential future
work that I think is very unlikely to be done (it's very hard to tell if
a pattern or set of patterns fully covers a node due to C++ predicates).
Also added a note that 'selectable' doesn't mean that InstructionSelect
must do it.
I had hoped that I could have some
```
.. code-block:: MIR
```
sections for MIR examples which causes a warning about pygments not
supporting it but we have warnings treated as errors
Summary:
I haven't refreshed the Function Calls section as I don't feel I have
sufficient knowledge of that area. It would be appreciated if someone could
review that section.
Note: I'm aware that pygments doesn't support 'mir' as used in one of the
code-block directives. This currently emits a warning and I decided to
keep it to enable finding them later. Maybe we can teach pygments to
support it.
Depends on D69456
Reviewers: volkan, aditya_nandakumar
Subscribers: rovka, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69457
Summary:
Rewrite the pipeline overview to be more focused on the structure and
flexibility as well as highlight the increased usefulness of
MachineVerifier and increased testability resulting from the smaller
incremental passes approach.
The diagrams are lifted from the slides for the LLVMDev 2019 talk
'Generating Optimized Code with GlobalISel' and adapted to be readable on
the white background used in the docs.
Reviewers: volkan
Subscribers: rovka, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69456
