* Various tidy-up and streamlining of existing discussion.
* Describes findSymbol and removeModule.
Chapter 1 is now rough but essentially complete in terms of content.
Feedback, patches etc. very welcome.
llvm-svn: 271225
The exit-on-error flag is necessary to avoid some assertions/unreachables. We
can get past them by creating a few dummy nodes.
Fixes PR27768, PR27769.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20726
llvm-svn: 271200
Since we already assert that the outgoing IR is in LCSSA, it is easy to
get misled into thinking that -indvars broke LCSSA if the incoming IR is
non-LCSSA. Checking this pre-condition will make such cases break in
more obvious ways.
Inspired by (but does _not_ fix) PR26682.
llvm-svn: 271196
This chapter demonstrates lazily JITing from ASTs with the expressions being
executed on a remote machine via a TCP connection. It needs some polish, but is
substantially complete.
Currently x86-64 SysV ABI (Darwin and Linux) only, but other architectures
can be supported by changing the server code to use alternative ABI support
classes from llvm/include/llvm/ExecutionEngine/Orc/OrcABISupport.h.
llvm-svn: 271193
This function failed to type-check as it was. No test case yet (we only have
regression tests for the remote-JIT code, and LLI don't use this function), but
an upcoming chapter of the Kaleidoscope Building A JIT tutorials will use
this.
llvm-svn: 271189
Consolidate documentation by removing comments from the .cpp file where
the comments in the .cpp file were copy-pasted from the header.
llvm-svn: 271157
Summary:
If we can prove that an op.with.overflow intrinsic does not overflow, we
can get rid of the intrinsic, and replace it with non-wrapping
arithmetic.
This was first checked in at r265913 but reverted in r265950 because it
exposed some issues around how SCEV handled post-inc add recurrences.
Those issues have now been fixed.
Reviewers: atrick, regehr
Subscribers: sanjoy, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18685
llvm-svn: 271153
Summary:
This change teaches SCEV to see reduce `(extractvalue
0 (op.with.overflow X Y))` into `op X Y` (with a no-wrap tag if
possible).
This was first checked in at r265912 but reverted in r265950 because it
exposed some issues around how SCEV handled post-inc add recurrences.
Those issues have now been fixed.
Reviewers: atrick, regehr
Subscribers: mcrosier, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18684
llvm-svn: 271152
Fixes PR27315.
The post-inc version of an add recurrence needs to "follow the same
rules" as a normal add or subtract expression. Otherwise we miscompile
programs like
```
int main() {
int a = 0;
unsigned a_u = 0;
volatile long last_value;
do {
a_u += 3;
last_value = (long) ((int) a_u);
if (will_add_overflow(a, 3)) {
// Leave, and don't actually do the increment, so no UB.
printf("last_value = %ld\n", last_value);
exit(0);
}
a += 3;
} while (a != 46);
return 0;
}
```
This patch changes SCEV to put no-wrap flags on post-inc add recurrences
only when the poison from a potential overflow will go ahead to cause
undefined behavior.
To avoid regressing performance too much, I've assumed infinite loops
without side effects is undefined behavior to prove poison<->UB
equivalence in more cases. This isn't ideal, but is not new to LLVM as
a whole, and far better than the situation I'm trying to fix.
llvm-svn: 271151
