accept an Invalidator that allows them to invalidate themselves if their
dependencies are in turn invalidated.
Rather than recording the dependency graph ahead of time when analysis
get results from other analyses, this simply lets each result trigger
the immediate invalidation of any analyses they actually depend on. They
do this in a way that has three nice properties:
1) They don't have to handle transitive dependencies because the
infrastructure will recurse for them.
2) The invalidate methods are still called only once. We just
dynamically discover the necessary topological ordering, everything
is memoized nicely.
3) The infrastructure still provides a default implementation and can
access it so that only analyses which have dependencies need to do
anything custom.
To make this work at all, the invalidation logic also has to defer the
deletion of the result objects themselves so that they can remain alive
until we have collected the complete set of results to invalidate.
A unittest is added here that has exactly the dependency pattern we are
concerned with. It hit the use-after-free described by Sean in much
detail in the long thread about analysis invalidation before this
change, and even in an intermediate form of this change where we failed
to defer the deletion of the result objects.
There is an important problem with doing dependency invalidation that
*isn't* solved here: we don't *enforce* that results correctly
invalidate all the analyses whose results they depend on.
I actually looked at what it would take to do that, and it isn't as hard
as I had thought but the complexity it introduces seems very likely to
outweigh the benefit. The technique would be to provide a base class for
an analysis result that would be populated with other results, and
automatically provide the invalidate method which immediately does the
correct thing. This approach has some nice pros IMO:
- Handles the case we care about and nothing else: only *results*
that depend on other analyses trigger extra invalidation.
- Localized to the result rather than centralized in the analysis
manager.
- Ties the storage of the reference to another result to the triggering
of the invalidation of that analysis.
- Still supports extending invalidation in customized ways.
But the down sides here are:
- Very heavy-weight meta-programming is needed to provide this base
class.
- Requires a pretty awful API for accessing the dependencies.
Ultimately, I fear it will not pull its weight. But we can re-evaluate
this at any point if we start discovering consistent problems where the
invalidation and dependencies get out of sync. It will fit as a clean
layer on top of the facilities in this patch that we can add if and when
we need it.
Note that I'm not really thrilled with the names for these APIs... The
name "Invalidator" seems ok but not great. The method name "invalidate"
also. In review some improvements were suggested, but they really need
*other* uses of these terms to be updated as well so I'm going to do
that in a follow-up commit.
I'm working on the actual fixes to various analyses that need to use
these, but I want to try to get tests for each of them so we don't
regress. And those changes are seperable and obvious so once this goes
in I should be able to roll them out throughout LLVM.
Many thanks to Sean, Justin, and others for help reviewing here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23738
llvm-svn: 288077
This fixes a regression introduced by r285714: we weren't setting the
rpath on LLVMgold.so correctly.
Spotted by mark@chromium.org!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27176
llvm-svn: 288076
Preserving lifetime markers isn't as important as allowing promotion,
so just drop the lifetime markers if necessary.
This also fixes an assertion failure where other parts of SROA assumed
that lifetime markers never block promotion.
Fixes https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=29139.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24854
llvm-svn: 288074
Some scanner errors were not checked and reported by the parser.
Fix PR30934. Recommit r288014 after fixing unittest.
Patch by: Serge Guelton <serge.guelton@telecom-bretagne.eu>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26419
llvm-svn: 288071
This makes the createGenericSchedLive() function that constructs the
default scheduler available for the public API. This should help when
you want to get a scheduler and the default list of DAG mutations.
This also shrinks the list of default DAG mutations:
{Load|Store}ClusterDAGMutation and MacroFusionDAGMutation are no longer
added by default. Targets can easily add them if they need them. It also
makes it easier for targets to add alternative/custom macrofusion or
clustering mutations while staying with the default
createGenericSchedLive(). It also saves the callback back and forth in
TargetInstrInfo::enableClusterLoads()/enableClusterStores().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26986
llvm-svn: 288057
Codegen prepare sinks comparisons close to a user is we have only one register
for conditions. For AMDGPU we have many SGPRs capable to hold vector conditions.
Changed BE to report we have many condition registers. That way IR LICM pass
would hoist an invariant comparison out of a loop and codegen prepare will not
sink it.
With that done a condition is calculated in one block and used in another.
Current behavior is to store workitem's condition in a VGPR using v_cndmask_b32
and then restore it with yet another v_cmp instruction from that v_cndmask's
result. To mitigate the issue a propagation of source SGPR pair in place of v_cmp
is implemented. Additional side effect of this is that we may consume less VGPRs
at a cost of more SGPRs in case if holding of multiple conditions is needed, and
that is a clear win in most cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26114
llvm-svn: 288053
Summary:
As far as I can tell, doing our own computations in
NearestCommonDominator is a false optimization -- DomTree will build up
what appears to be exactly this data when it decides it's worthwhile.
Moreover, by building the cache ourselves, we cannot take advantage of
the cache that the domtree might have available.
In addition, I am not convinced of the correctness of the original code.
In particular, setting ResultIndex = 1 on the first addBlock instead of
setting it to 0 is quite fishy. Similarly, it's not clear to me that
setting IndexMap[Node] = 0 for every node as we walk up the tree finding
a common parent is correct. But rather than ponder over these
questions, I'd rather just make the code do the obviously-correct thing.
This patch also changes the NearestCommonDominator API a bit, improving
the names and getting rid of the boolean parameter in addBlock -- see
http://jlebar.com/2011/12/16/Boolean_parameters_to_API_functions_considered_harmful..html
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: aemerson, wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26998
llvm-svn: 288050
At the moment optimized tablegen is generated by LLVM_USE_HOST_TOOLS variable that is not set for Visual Sudio since LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS depends on CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE value that is not equal to "DEBUG" in case of Visual Studio soltion generation.
Modified to do not depend on LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS value in VS and Xcode cases
Reviewers: beanz
Subscribers: RKSimon, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27135
llvm-svn: 288042
Bit-shifts by a whole number of bytes can be represented as a shuffle mask suitable for combining.
Added a 'getFauxShuffleMask' function to allow us to create shuffle masks from other suitable operations.
llvm-svn: 288040
This adds assembler support for the instructions provided by the
execution-hint facility (NIAI and BP(R)P). This required adding
support for the new relocation types for 12-bit and 24-bit PC-
relative offsets used by the BP(R)P instructions.
llvm-svn: 288031
This patch adds assembler support for the remaining branch instructions:
the non-relative branch on count variants, and all variants of branch
on index.
The only one of those that can be readily exploited for code generation
is BRCTH (branch on count using a high 32-bit register as count). Do
use it, however, it is necessary to also introduce a hew CHIMux pseudo
to allow comparisons of a 32-bit value agains a short immediate to go
into a high register as well (implemented via CHI/CIH).
This causes a bit of codegen changes overall, but those have proven to
be neutral (or even beneficial) in performance measurements.
llvm-svn: 288029
This patch moves formation of LOC-type instructions from (late)
IfConversion to the early if-conversion pass, and in some cases
additionally creates them directly from select instructions
during DAG instruction selection.
To make early if-conversion work, the patch implements the
canInsertSelect / insertSelect callbacks. It also implements
the commuteInstructionImpl and FoldImmediate callbacks to
enable generation of the full range of LOC instructions.
Finally, the patch adds support for all instructions of the
load-store-on-condition-2 facility, which allows using LOC
instructions also for high registers.
Due to the use of the GRX32 register class to enable high registers,
we now also have to handle the cases where there are still no single
hardware instructions (conditional move from a low register to a high
register or vice versa). These are converted back to a branch sequence
after register allocation. Since the expandRAPseudos callback is not
allowed to create new basic blocks, this requires a simple new pass,
modelled after the ARM/AArch64 ExpandPseudos pass.
Overall, this patch causes significantly more LOC-type instructions
to be used, and results in a measurable performance improvement.
llvm-svn: 288028
In r286814, the algorithm for calculating inline costs changed. This
caused more inlining to take place which is especially apparent
in optsize and minsize modes.
As the cost calculation removed a skewed behaviour (we were inconsistent
about the cost of calls) it isn't possible to update the thresholds to
get exactly the same behaviour as before. However, this threshold change
accounts for the very common case where an inline candidate has no
calls within it. In this case, r286814 would inline around 5-6 more (IR)
instructions.
The changes to -Oz have been heavily benchmarked. The "obvious" value
for the inline threshold at -Oz is zero, but due to inaccuracies in the
inline heuristics this can actually cause code size increases due to
not inlining key thunk functions (that then disappear). Experimentally,
5 was the sweet spot for code size over the test-suite.
For -Os, this change removes the outlier results shown up by green dragon
(http://104.154.54.203/db_default/v4/nts/13248).
Fixes D26848.
llvm-svn: 288024
This never made a lot of sense. They've been invalidated for one IR unit
but they aren't really preserved in any normal sense. It seemed like it
would be an elegant way of communicating to outer IR units that pass
managers and adaptors had already handled invalidation, but we've since
ended up adding sets that model this more clearly: we're now using
the 'AllAnalysesOn<IRUnitT>' set to handle cases where the trick of
"preserving" invalidated analyses didn't work.
This patch moves to rely on that technique exclusively and removes the
cumbersome API aspect of updating the preserved set when doing
invalidation. This in turn will simplify a *number* of upcoming patches.
This has a side benefit of exposing a number of places where we were
failing to mark the 'AllAnalysesOn<IRUnitT>' set as preserved. This
patch fixes those, and with those fixes shouldn't change any observable
behavior.
llvm-svn: 288023
Some scanner errors were not checked and reported by the parser.
Fix PR30934
Patch by: Serge Guelton <serge.guelton@telecom-bretagne.eu>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26419
llvm-svn: 288014
I don't think isel selects these today, favoring adding the register to itself instead. But the load folding tables shouldn't be so concerned with what isel will use and just represent the relationships.
llvm-svn: 288007
Note that the non-splat lshr+lshr test folded, but that does not
work in general. Something is missing or wrong in computeKnownBits
as the non-splat shl+shl test still shows.
llvm-svn: 288005
If we were to unfold these, the load size would be increased to the register size. This is not safe to do since the enlarged load can do things like cross a page boundary into a page that doesn't exist.
I probably missed some instructions, but this should be a large portion of them.
llvm-svn: 288001
