1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-24 03:33:20 +01:00
Commit Graph

128 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Xin Tong
27af3ca9d1 [ORE] Move loop invariant ORE checks outside the PM loop.
Summary:
This takes 22ms out of ~20s compiling sqlite3.c because we call it
for every unit of compilation and every pass.

Reviewers: paquette, anemet

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49586

llvm-svn: 337654
2018-07-22 05:27:41 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
8a9d5a8c29 [LegacyPM] Fix PR37888 by teaching the legacy loop pass manager how to
clear out deleted loops from the current queue beyond just the current
loop.

This is important because SimpleLoopUnswitch will now enqueue the same
loop to be re-processed. When it does this with the legacy PM, we don't
have a way of canceling the rest of the pipeline and so we can end up
deleting the loop before we reprocess it. =/

This change also makes it easy to support deleting other loops in the
queue to process, although I don't have any use cases for that.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48470

llvm-svn: 335317
2018-06-22 02:43:41 +00:00
Jessica Paquette
95c7144e65 Add remarks describing when a pass changes the IR instruction count of a module
This patch adds a remark which tells the user when a pass changes the number of
IR instructions in a module.

It can be enabled by using -Rpass-analysis=size-info.

The point of this is to make it easier to collect statistics on how passes
modify programs in terms of code size. This is similar in concept to timing
reports, but using a remark-based interface makes it easy to diff changes over
multiple compilations of the same program.

By adding functionality like this, we can see
  * Which passes impact code size the most
  * How passes impact code size at different optimization levels
  * Which pass might have contributed the most to an overall code size
    regression

The patch lives in the legacy pass manager, but since it's simply emitting
remarks, it shouldn't be too difficult to adapt the functionality to the new
pass manager as well. This can also be adapted to handle MachineInstr counts in
code gen passes.

https://reviews.llvm.org/D38768

llvm-svn: 332739
2018-05-18 17:26:39 +00:00
Nicola Zaghen
9667127c14 Rename DEBUG macro to LLVM_DEBUG.
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.

In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624

llvm-svn: 332240
2018-05-14 12:53:11 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev
f4f5aa42aa [NFC] OptPassGate extracted from OptBisect
Summary:
This is an NFC refactoring of the OptBisect class to split it into an optional pass gate interface used by LLVMContext and the Optional Pass Bisector (OptBisect) used for debugging of optional passes.

This refactoring is needed for D44464, which introduces setOptPassGate() method to allow implementations other than OptBisect.

Patch by Yevgeny Rouban.

Reviewers: andrew.w.kaylor, fedor.sergeev, vsk, dberlin, Eugene.Zelenko, reames, skatkov
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44821

llvm-svn: 328637
2018-03-27 16:57:20 +00:00
Michael Zolotukhin
a514df4185 Follow-up for r324429: "[LCSSAVerification] Run verification only when asserts are enabled."
Before r324429 we essentially didn't have a verification of LCSSA, so
no wonder that it has been broken: currently loop-sink breaks it (the
attached test illustrates the failure).

It was detected during a stage2 RA build, so to unbreak it I'm disabling
the check for now.

llvm-svn: 324445
2018-02-07 04:24:44 +00:00
Michael Zolotukhin
e89688ac64 [LCSSAVerification] Run verification only when asserts are enabled.
llvm-svn: 324429
2018-02-07 00:13:08 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
74564c24f8 [PM/Unswitch] Teach SimpleLoopUnswitch to do non-trivial unswitching,
making it no longer even remotely simple.

The pass will now be more of a "full loop unswitching" pass rather than
anything substantively simpler than any other approach. I plan to rename
it accordingly once the dust settles.

The key ideas of the new loop unswitcher are carried over for
non-trivial unswitching:
1) Fully unswitch a branch or switch instruction from inside of a loop to
   outside of it.
2) Update the CFG and IR. This avoids needing to "remember" the
   unswitched branches as well as avoiding excessively cloning and
   reliance on complex parts of simplify-cfg to cleanup the cfg.
3) Update the analyses (where we can) rather than just blowing them away
   or relying on something else updating them.

Sadly, #3 is somewhat compromised here as the dominator tree updates
were too complex for me to want to reason about. I will need to make
another attempt to do this now that we have a nice dynamic update API
for dominators. However, we do adhere to #3 w.r.t. LoopInfo.

This approach also adds an important principls specific to non-trivial
unswitching: not *all* of the loop will be duplicated when unswitching.
This fact allows us to compute the cost in terms of how much *duplicate*
code is inserted rather than just on raw size. Unswitching conditions
which essentialy partition loops will work regardless of the total loop
size.

Some remaining issues that I will be addressing in subsequent commits:
- Handling unstructured control flow.
- Unswitching 'switch' cases instead of just branches.
- Moving to the dynamic update API for dominators.

Some high-level, interesting limitationsV that folks might want to push
on as follow-ups but that I don't have any immediate plans around:
- We could be much more clever about not cloning things that will be
  deleted. In fact, we should be able to delete *nothing* and do
  a minimal number of clones.
- There are many more interesting selection criteria for which branch to
  unswitch that we might want to look at. One that I'm interested in
  particularly are a set of conditions which all exit the loop and which
  can be merged into a single unswitched test of them.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34200

llvm-svn: 318549
2017-11-17 19:58:36 +00:00
Sanjoy Das
3115e502f7 Use a BumpPtrAllocator for Loop objects
Summary:
And now that we no longer have to explicitly free() the Loop instances, we can
(with more ease) use the destructor of LoopBase to do what LoopBase::clear() was
doing.

Reviewers: chandlerc

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mcrosier, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38201

llvm-svn: 314375
2017-09-28 02:45:42 +00:00
Sanjoy Das
64884488b6 Tighten the invariants around LoopBase::invalidate
Summary:
With this change:
 - Methods in LoopBase trip an assert if the receiver has been invalidated
 - LoopBase::clear frees up the memory held the LoopBase instance

This change also shuffles things around as necessary to work with this stricter invariant.

Reviewers: chandlerc

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mcrosier, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38055

llvm-svn: 313708
2017-09-20 02:31:57 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
23545833ac [LegacyPM] Make the 'addLoop' method accept a loop to add rather than
having it internally allocate the loop.

This is a much more flexible API and necessary in the new loop unswitch
to reasonably support both new and old PMs in common code. It also just
seems like a cleaner separation of concerns.

NFC, this should just be a pure refactoring.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33528

llvm-svn: 303834
2017-05-25 03:01:31 +00:00
Yaron Keren
25f86e230e Implement getPassName() for IR printing passes.
llvm-svn: 297442
2017-03-10 07:09:20 +00:00
Serge Pavlov
121b7d2a81 Reverted: Track validity of pass results
Commits r291882 and related r291887.

llvm-svn: 292062
2017-01-15 10:23:18 +00:00
Serge Pavlov
c81d1f1786 Track validity of pass results
Running tests with expensive checks enabled exhibits some problems with
verification of pass results.

First, the pass verification may require results of analysis that are not
available. For instance, verification of loop info requires results of dominator
tree analysis. A pass may be marked as conserving loop info but does not need to
be dependent on DominatorTreePass. When a pass manager tries to verify that loop
info is valid, it needs dominator tree, but corresponding analysis may be
already destroyed as no user of it remained.

Another case is a pass that is skipped. For instance, entities with linkage
available_externally do not need code generation and such passes are skipped for
them. In this case result verification must also be skipped.

To solve these problems this change introduces a special flag to the Pass
structure to mark passes that have valid results. If this flag is reset,
verifications dependent on the pass result are skipped.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27190

llvm-svn: 291882
2017-01-13 06:09:54 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
e59e4b3dc5 [PM] Separate the LoopAnalysisManager from the LoopPassManager and move
the latter to the Transforms library.

While the loop PM uses an analysis to form the IR units, the current
plan is to have the PM itself establish and enforce both loop simplified
form and LCSSA. This would be a layering violation in the analysis
library.

Fundamentally, the idea behind the loop PM is to *transform* loops in
addition to running passes over them, so it really seemed like the most
natural place to sink this was into the transforms library.

We can't just move *everything* because we also have loop analyses that
rely on a subset of the invariants. So this patch splits the the loop
infrastructure into the analysis management that has to be part of the
analysis library, and the transform-aware pass manager.

This also required splitting the loop analyses' printer passes out to
the transforms library, which makes sense to me as running these will
transform the code into LCSSA in theory.

I haven't split the unittest though because testing one component
without the other seems nearly intractable.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28452

llvm-svn: 291662
2017-01-11 09:43:56 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
4855803b43 [PM] Rewrite the loop pass manager to use a worklist and augmented run
arguments much like the CGSCC pass manager.

This is a major redesign following the pattern establish for the CGSCC layer to
support updates to the set of loops during the traversal of the loop nest and
to support invalidation of analyses.

An additional significant burden in the loop PM is that so many passes require
access to a large number of function analyses. Manually ensuring these are
cached, available, and preserved has been a long-standing burden in LLVM even
with the help of the automatic scheduling in the old pass manager. And it made
the new pass manager extremely unweildy. With this design, we can package the
common analyses up while in a function pass and make them immediately available
to all the loop passes. While in some cases this is unnecessary, I think the
simplicity afforded is worth it.

This does not (yet) address loop simplified form or LCSSA form, but those are
the next things on my radar and I have a clear plan for them.

While the patch is very large, most of it is either mechanically updating loop
passes to the new API or the new testing for the loop PM. The code for it is
reasonably compact.

I have not yet updated all of the loop passes to correctly leverage the update
mechanisms demonstrated in the unittests. I'll do that in follow-up patches
along with improved FileCheck tests for those passes that ensure things work in
more realistic scenarios. In many cases, there isn't much we can do with these
until the loop simplified form and LCSSA form are in place.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28292

llvm-svn: 291651
2017-01-11 06:23:21 +00:00
Igor Laevsky
1777237add [LCSSA] Perform LCSSA verification only for the current loop nest.
Now LPPassManager will run LCSSA verification only for the top-level loop
which was processed on the current iteration.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25873

llvm-svn: 285394
2016-10-28 12:57:20 +00:00
Sean Silva
8e46796ab9 Consistently use LoopAnalysisManager
One exception here is LoopInfo which must forward-declare it (because
the typedef is in LoopPassManager.h which depends on LoopInfo).

Also, some includes for LoopPassManager.h were needed since that file
provides the typedef.

Besides a general consistently benefit, the extra layer of indirection
allows the mechanical part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23256 that
requires touching every transformation and analysis to be factored out
cleanly.

Thanks to David for the suggestion.

llvm-svn: 278079
2016-08-09 00:28:52 +00:00
David Majnemer
925d7755b2 [LoopPass] Some minor cleanups
No functional change is intended.

llvm-svn: 275999
2016-07-19 17:50:24 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer
725f4a1120 Apply clang-tidy's modernize-loop-convert to lib/Analysis.
Only minor manual fixes. No functionality change intended.

llvm-svn: 273816
2016-06-26 17:27:42 +00:00
Eli Friedman
e2586910ce Fix dynamically linked debug builds.
On the surface, this might not look like it does anything... but
actually it brings in the declaration "extern template class
AnalysisManager<Loop>;", which suppresses the instantiation of the
constructor, which avoids the funny interaction between "extern
template" and -fvisibility-inlines-hidden.

llvm-svn: 273133
2016-06-20 02:48:11 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
4cad16d76c [PM] Remove support for omitting the AnalysisManager argument to new
pass manager passes' `run` methods.

This removes a bunch of SFINAE goop from the pass manager and just
requires pass authors to accept `AnalysisManager<IRUnitT> &` as a dead
argument. This is a small price to pay for the simplicity of the system
as a whole, despite the noise that changing it causes at this stage.

This will also helpfull allow us to make the signature of the run
methods much more flexible for different kinds af passes to support
things like intelligently updating the pass's progression over IR units.

While this touches many, many, files, the changes are really boring.
Mostly made with the help of my trusty perl one liners.

Thanks to Sean and Hal for bouncing ideas for this with me in IRC.

llvm-svn: 272978
2016-06-17 00:11:01 +00:00
Andrew Kaylor
653d361880 Re-commit optimization bisect support (r267022) without new pass manager support.
The original commit was reverted because of a buildbot problem with LazyCallGraph::SCC handling (not related to the OptBisect handling).

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172

llvm-svn: 267231
2016-04-22 22:06:11 +00:00
Vedant Kumar
b6cc52b7d8 Revert "Initial implementation of optimization bisect support."
This reverts commit r267022, due to an ASan failure:

  http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage2-cmake-RgSan_check/1549

llvm-svn: 267115
2016-04-22 06:51:37 +00:00
Andrew Kaylor
fd49f275f8 Initial implementation of optimization bisect support.
This patch implements a optimization bisect feature, which will allow optimizations to be selectively disabled at compile time in order to track down test failures that are caused by incorrect optimizations.

The bisection is enabled using a new command line option (-opt-bisect-limit).  Individual passes that may be skipped call the OptBisect object (via an LLVMContext) to see if they should be skipped based on the bisect limit.  A finer level of control (disabling individual transformations) can be managed through an addition OptBisect method, but this is not yet used.

The skip checking in this implementation is based on (and replaces) the skipOptnoneFunction check.  Where that check was being called, a new call has been inserted in its place which checks the bisect limit and the optnone attribute.  A new function call has been added for module and SCC passes that behaves in a similar way.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172

llvm-svn: 267022
2016-04-21 17:58:54 +00:00
Justin Bogner
879f86bb78 LoopInfo: Simplify ownership of Loop objects
It's strange that LoopInfo mostly owns the Loop objects, but that it
defers deleting them to the loop pass manager. Instead, change the
oddly named "updateUnloop" to "markAsRemoved" and have it queue the
Loop object for deletion. We can't delete the Loop immediately when we
remove it, since we need its pointer identity still, so we'll mark the
object as "invalid" so that clients can see what's going on.

llvm-svn: 257191
2016-01-08 19:08:53 +00:00
Weiming Zhao
9cb99de9a4 Recommit r256952 "Filtering IR printing for print-after-all/print-before-all"
Fix lit test fail due to outputting an extra line.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15776

llvm-svn: 256987
2016-01-06 22:55:03 +00:00
Weiming Zhao
525343c267 Revert r256952 due to lit test fails.
llvm-svn: 256954
2016-01-06 18:31:44 +00:00
Weiming Zhao
b7a49247d4 Filtering IR printing for print-after-all/print-before-all
Summary:
This patch implements "-print-funcs" option to support function filtering for IR printing like -print-after-all, -print-before etc.
Examples:
  -print-after-all -print-funcs=foo,bar

Reviewers: mcrosier, joker.eph

Subscribers: tejohnson, joker.eph, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15776

llvm-svn: 256952
2016-01-06 18:20:25 +00:00
Justin Bogner
58647df890 LPM: Make callers of LPM.deleteLoopFromQueue update LoopInfo directly. NFC
As of r255720, the loop pass manager will DTRT when passes update the
loop info for removed loops, so they no longer need to reach into
LPPassManager APIs to do this kind of transformation. This change very
nearly removes the need for the LPPassManager to even be passed into
loop passes - the only remaining pass that uses the LPM argument is
LoopUnswitch.

llvm-svn: 255797
2015-12-16 18:40:20 +00:00
Justin Bogner
5c61081fe6 LPM: Simplify how passes mark loops for deletion. NFC
When a pass removes a loop it currently has to reach up into the
LPPassManager's internals to update the state of the iteration over
loops. This reverse dependency results in a pretty awkward interplay
of the LPPassManager and its Passes.

Here, we change this to instead keep track of when a loop has become
"unlooped" in the Loop objects themselves, then the LPPassManager can
check this and manipulate its own state directly. This opens the door
to allow most of the loop passes to work without a backreference to
the LPPassManager.

I've kept passes calling the LPPassManager::deleteLoopFromQueue API
now so I could put an assert in to prove that this is NFC, but a later
pass will update passes just to preserve the LoopInfo directly and
stop referencing the LPPassManager completely.

llvm-svn: 255720
2015-12-16 00:01:02 +00:00
Justin Bogner
4f0860a6c9 PM: Rephrase PrintLoopPass as a wrapper around a new-style pass. NFC
Splits PrintLoopPass into a new-style pass and a PrintLoopPassWrapper,
much like we already do for PrintFunctionPass and PrintModulePass.

llvm-svn: 252085
2015-11-04 22:24:08 +00:00
Justin Bogner
55d6455292 LoopPass: Remove redoLoop, it isn't used. NFC
In r251064 I removed a logically unreachable call to `redoLoop`, and
now there aren't any callers of this API at all. Remove the needless
complexity.

llvm-svn: 251067
2015-10-22 21:31:34 +00:00
Justin Bogner
8d6fc38768 LoopPass: Simplify the API for adding a new loop. NFC
The insertLoop() API is only used to add new loops, and has confusing
ownership semantics. Simplify it by replacing it with addLoop().

llvm-svn: 251064
2015-10-22 21:21:32 +00:00
Alexander Kornienko
f993659b8f Revert r240137 (Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC)
Apparently, the style needs to be agreed upon first.

llvm-svn: 240390
2015-06-23 09:49:53 +00:00
Alexander Kornienko
40cb19d802 Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC
The patch is generated using this command:

tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
  -checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
  llvm/lib/


Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!

llvm-svn: 240137
2015-06-19 15:57:42 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer
45a545b9c6 Purge unused includes throughout libSupport.
NFC.

llvm-svn: 232976
2015-03-23 18:07:13 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
c47432114d [PM] Split the LoopInfo object apart from the legacy pass, creating
a LoopInfoWrapperPass to wire the object up to the legacy pass manager.

This switches all the clients of LoopInfo over and paves the way to port
LoopInfo to the new pass manager. No functionality change is intended
with this iteration.

llvm-svn: 226373
2015-01-17 14:16:18 +00:00
David Peixotto
1c44b9f4ef Fix assertion in LICM doFinalization()
The doFinalization method checks that the LoopToAliasSetMap is
empty. LICM populates that map as it runs through the loop nest,
deleting the entries for child loops as it goes. However, if a child
loop is deleted by another pass (e.g. unrolling) then the loop will
never be deleted from the map because LICM walks the loop nest to
find entries it can delete.

The fix is to delete the loop from the map and free the alias set
when the loop is deleted from the loop nest.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5305

llvm-svn: 218387
2014-09-24 16:48:31 +00:00
Richard Trieu
b7d5af56cb Add back functionality removed in r210497.
Instead of asserting, output a message stating that a null pointer was found.

llvm-svn: 211430
2014-06-21 02:43:02 +00:00
Richard Trieu
8c7b353cd7 Removing an "if (!this)" check from two print methods. The condition will
never be true in a well-defined context.  The checking for null pointers
has been moved into the caller logic so it does not rely on undefined behavior.

llvm-svn: 210497
2014-06-09 22:53:16 +00:00
Juergen Ributzka
271cad0970 Add C API for thread yielding callback.
Sometimes a LLVM compilation may take more time then a client would like to
wait for. The problem is that it is not possible to safely suspend the LLVM
thread from the outside. When the timing is bad it might be possible that the
LLVM thread holds a global mutex and this would block any progress in any other
thread.

This commit adds a new yield callback function that can be registered with a
context. LLVM will try to yield by calling this callback function, but there is
no guaranteed frequency. LLVM will only do so if it can guarantee that
suspending the thread won't block any forward progress in other LLVM contexts
in the same process.

Once the client receives the call back it can suspend the thread safely and
resume it at another time.

Related to <rdar://problem/16728690>

llvm-svn: 208945
2014-05-16 02:33:15 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
15c7b91ac2 [Modules] Make Support/Debug.h modular. This requires it to not change
behavior based on other files defining DEBUG_TYPE, which means it cannot
define DEBUG_TYPE at all. This is actually better IMO as it forces folks
to define relevant DEBUG_TYPEs for their files. However, it requires all
files that currently use DEBUG(...) to define a DEBUG_TYPE if they don't
already. I've updated all such files in LLVM and will do the same for
other upstream projects.

This still leaves one important change in how LLVM uses the DEBUG_TYPE
macro going forward: we need to only define the macro *after* header
files have been #include-ed. Previously, this wasn't possible because
Debug.h required the macro to be pre-defined. This commit removes that.
By defining DEBUG_TYPE after the includes two things are fixed:

- Header files that need to provide a DEBUG_TYPE for some inline code
  can do so by defining the macro before their inline code and undef-ing
  it afterward so the macro does not escape.

- We no longer have rampant ODR violations due to including headers with
  different DEBUG_TYPE definitions. This may be mostly an academic
  violation today, but with modules these types of violations are easy
  to check for and potentially very relevant.

Where necessary to suppor headers with DEBUG_TYPE, I have moved the
definitions below the includes in this commit. I plan to move the rest
of the DEBUG_TYPE macros in LLVM in subsequent commits; this one is big
enough.

The comments in Debug.h, which were hilariously out of date already,
have been updated to reflect the recommended practice going forward.

llvm-svn: 206822
2014-04-21 22:55:11 +00:00
Craig Topper
8cd194d4c1 [C++11] More 'nullptr' conversion. In some cases just using a boolean check instead of comparing to nullptr.
llvm-svn: 206243
2014-04-15 04:59:12 +00:00
Craig Topper
4c58d1a8e2 [C++11] Add 'override' keyword to virtual methods that override their base class.
llvm-svn: 202945
2014-03-05 07:30:04 +00:00
Paul Robinson
ea4fd2b99b Constify the Optnone checks in IR passes.
llvm-svn: 202213
2014-02-26 01:23:26 +00:00
Paul Robinson
189e175394 Disable most IR-level transform passes on functions marked 'optnone'.
Ideally only those transform passes that run at -O0 remain enabled,
in reality we get as close as we reasonably can.
Passes are responsible for disabling themselves, it's not the job of
the pass manager to do it for them.

llvm-svn: 200892
2014-02-06 00:07:05 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
076d51813d [PM] Rename the IR printing pass header to a more generic and correct
name to match the source file which I got earlier. Update the include
sites. Also modernize the comments in the header to use the more
recommended doxygen style.

llvm-svn: 199041
2014-01-12 11:10:32 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
7aa902a488 Move the LLVM IR asm writer header files into the IR directory, as they
are part of the core IR library in order to support dumping and other
basic functionality.

Rename the 'Assembly' include directory to 'AsmParser' to match the
library name and the only functionality left their -- printing has been
in the core IR library for quite some time.

Update all of the #includes to match.

All of this started because I wanted to have the layering in good shape
before I started adding support for printing LLVM IR using the new pass
infrastructure, and commandline support for the new pass infrastructure.

llvm-svn: 198688
2014-01-07 12:34:26 +00:00
Andrew Trick
3a27f5b69d Comment: try to clarify loop iteration order.
llvm-svn: 186774
2013-07-20 23:10:31 +00:00