Previously, we ignored the difference between V64 and V128 when parsing
assembly: they both got mapped to registers in the FPR128 class. This is
basically harmless at the moment because they both print and encode the same
way. However, it will affect the printing of aliases.
llvm-svn: 208866
Summary:
No support for symbols in place of the immediate yet since it requires new
relocations.
Depends on D3671
Reviewers: jkolek, zoran.jovanovic, vmedic
Reviewed By: vmedic
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3689
llvm-svn: 208858
much more effectively when trying to constant fold a load of a constant.
Previously, we only handled bitcasts by trying to find a totally generic
byte representation of the constant and use that. Now, we look through
the bitcast to see what constant we might fold the load into, and then
try to form a constant expression cast of the found value that would be
equivalent to loading the value.
You might wonder why on earth this actually matters. Well, turns out
that the Itanium ABI causes us to create a single array for a vtable
where the first elements are virtual base offsets, followed by the
virtual function pointers. Because the array is homogenous the element
type is consistently i8* and we inttoptr the virtual base offsets into
the initial elements.
Then constructors bitcast these pointers to i64 pointers prior to
loading them. Boom, no more constant folding of virtual base offsets.
This is the first fix to LLVM to address the *insane* performance Eric
Niebler discovered with Clang on his range comprehensions[1]. There is
more to come though, this doesn't *really* fix the problem fully.
[1]: http://ericniebler.com/2014/04/27/range-comprehensions/
llvm-svn: 208856
Summary:
They aren't implemented for any ISA at the moment.
Depends on D3670
Reviewers: jkolek, zoran.jovanovic, vmedic
Reviewed By: vmedic
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3671
llvm-svn: 208855
if ((x & C) == 0) x |= C becomes x |= C
if ((x & C) != 0) x ^= C becomes x &= ~C
if ((x & C) == 0) x ^= C becomes x |= C
if ((x & C) != 0) x &= ~C becomes x &= ~C
if ((x & C) == 0) x &= ~C becomes nothing
Z3 Verifications code for above transform
http://rise4fun.com/Z3/Pmsh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3717
llvm-svn: 208848
Summary:
This gets rid of a sub instruction by moving the negation to the
constant when valid.
Reviewers: nicholas
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3773
llvm-svn: 208827
Abstract variables should never have/use locations. In this case the
data wasn't used, so no functional change intended here, just
simplification.
llvm-svn: 208820
Many old tests using prior schemas still had some brokenness here (both
indirect arrays and arrays with single bogus elements). Fixed those up
so they don't hit the new assertions.
Also reduced nesting in some places, etc.
llvm-svn: 208817
This is just unneccessary - we only create abstract definitions when
we're inlining anyway, so there's no reason to delay this to see if
we're going to inline anything.
llvm-svn: 208798
If the function has the landingpad instruction, then the
handlerdata should be emitted even if the function has
nouwnind attribute. Otherwise, following code will not
work:
void test1() noexcept {
try {
throw_exception();
} catch (...) {
log_unexpected_exception();
}
}
Since the cantunwind was incorrectly emitted and the
LSDA is not available.
llvm-svn: 208791
The commit r208166 will cause some regression on ARM EHABI.
This fix has been committed in r208715, and an assertion failure
test case has been committed in r208770.
This commit further extends the unittest so that the actual
value in the handlerdata will be checked.
llvm-svn: 208790
For example
tzcntl %edi, %ebx
testl %edi, %edi
je .label
can be rewritten into
tzcntl %edi, %ebx
jb .label
A minor complication is that tzcnt sets CF instead of ZF when the input
is zero, we have to rewrite users of the flags from ZF to CF. Currently
we recognize patterns using lzcnt, tzcnt and popcnt.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3454
llvm-svn: 208788
Summary:
To limit the number of tests required, only one 64-bit ISA prior to MIPS64 are tested.
rdhwr has been deliberately left without an ISA annotation for now. This is
because the assembler and CodeGen disagree on when the instruction is
available. Strictly speaking, it is only available in MIPS32r2 and
MIPS64r2. However, it is emulated by a kernel trap on earlier ISA's and is
necessary for TLS so CodeGen should emit it on older ISA's too.
Depends on D3697
Reviewers: vmedic
Reviewed By: vmedic
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3698
llvm-svn: 208785
Summary:
Also use named constants for common opcode fields.
Depends on D3669
Reviewers: vmedic, zoran.jovanovic, jkolek
Reviewed By: jkolek
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3670
llvm-svn: 208784
Most importantly, it gives debug location info to the coverage callback.
This change also removes 2 cases of unnecessary setDebugLoc when IRBuilder
is created with the same debug location.
llvm-svn: 208767
The ELF header e_flags field in the MIPS related test cases handled
incorrectly. The obj2yaml prints too many flags. I will fix that in the
next patches.
The patch reviewed by Michael Spencer and Sean Silva.
llvm-svn: 208752
The UDF instruction is a reserved undefined instruction space. The assembler
mnemonic was introduced with ARM ARM rev C.a. The instruction is not predicated
and the immediate constant is ignored by the CPU. Add support for the three
encodings for this instruction.
The changes to the invalid instruction test is due to the fact that the invalid
instructions actually overlap with the undefined instruction. Introduction of
the new instruction results in a partial decode as an undefined sequence. Drop
the tests as they are invalid instruction patterns anyways.
llvm-svn: 208751
This was reverted in r208642 due to regressions surrounding file changes
within lexical scopes causing inlining information to be lost.
The issue was in LexicalScopes::getOrCreateInlinedScope, where I was
previously testing "isLexicalBlock" which is false for
"DILexicalBlockFile" (a scope used to represent changes in the current
file name) and assuming it was then a function (breaking out of the
inlined scope path and reaching for the parent non-inlined scopes). By
inverting the condition and testing for "isSubprogram" the correct
behavior is attained.
(also found some weirdness in Clang, see r208742 when reducing this test
case - the resulting test case doesn't apply with the Clang fix, but
I've added a more realistic test case to inline-scopes.ll which does
reproduce the issue and demonstrate the fix)
llvm-svn: 208748
