If all the demanded elements of the SimplifyDemandedVectorElts are known to be UNDEF, we can simplify to an ISD::UNDEF node.
Zero constant folding will be handled in a future patch - its a little trickier as we often have bitcasted zero values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55511
llvm-svn: 348784
As discussed on D55511, this caused an issue if the inner node deletes a node that the outer node depends upon. As it doesn't affect any lit-tests and I've only been able to expose this with the D55511 change I'm committing this now.
llvm-svn: 348781
This should really be generalized to allow increment and/or
we should replace it by using ISD::matchUnaryPredicate().
See D55515 for context.
llvm-svn: 348776
Refactor the scheduling predicates based on `MCInstPredicate`. In this
case, for the Exynos processors.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55345
llvm-svn: 348774
This commit changes which l1 flush instruction is used for AMDPAL and
MESA3d workloads to flush the entire l1 cache instead of just the
volatile lines.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55367
llvm-svn: 348771
Refactor the scheduling predicates based on `MCInstPredicate`. Augment the
number of helper predicates used by processor specific predicates.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55375
llvm-svn: 348768
Record the stack protector index in MachineFrameInfo when translating
Intrinsic::stackprotector similarly as is done by SelectionDAG when
processing the same intrinsic.
Setting this index allows the Prologue/Epilogue Insertion to recognize
that the stack protection is enabled. The pass can then make sure that
the stack protector comes before local variables on the stack and
assigns potentially vulnerable objects first so they are close to the
stack protector slot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55418
llvm-svn: 348761
When replacing jal with jalr, also emit '.reloc R_MIPS_JALR' (R_MICROMIPS_JALR
for micromips). The linker might then be able to turn jalr into a direct
call.
Add '-mips-jalr-reloc' to enable/disable this feature (default is true).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55292
llvm-svn: 348760
This triggers an assert when combining concat_vectors of a bitcast of
merge_values.
With asserts disabled, it fails to select:
fatal error: error in backend: Cannot select: 0x7ff19d000e90: i32 = any_extend 0x7ff19d000ae8
0x7ff19d000ae8: f64,ch = CopyFromReg 0x7ff19d000c20:1, Register:f64 %1
0x7ff19d000b50: f64 = Register %1
In function: d
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55507
llvm-svn: 348759
The list generated in the target parser tests is the
same as the one in the AArch64 target parser.
Use that one instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55509
llvm-svn: 348757
A new pass to manage the Mode register.
Currently this just manages the floating point double precision
rounding requirements, but is intended to be easily extended to
encompass all Mode register settings.
The immediate motivation comes from the requirement to use the
round-to-zero rounding mode for the 16 bit interpolation
instructions, where the rounding mode setting is shared between
16 and 64 bit operations.
llvm-svn: 348754
Currently, dbg.value's of "nullptr" are dropped when entering a SelectionDAG --
apparently just because of an oversight when recognising Values that are
constant (see PR39787). This patch adds ConstantPointerNull to the list of
constants that can be turned into DBG_VALUEs.
The matter of what bit-value a null pointer constant in LLVM has was raised
in this mailing list thread:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-December/128234.html
Where it transpires LLVM relies on (IR) null pointers being zero valued,
thus I've baked this assumption into the patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55227
llvm-svn: 348753
This is a fix for PR39896, where dbg.value's of SDNodes that have been
optimised out do not lead to "DBG_VALUE undef" instructions being created.
Such undef instructions are necessary to terminate earlier variable
ranges, otherwise variable values leak past the point where they're valid.
The "invalidated" flag of SDDbgValue is currently being abused to mean two
things:
* The corresponding SDNode is now invalid
* This SDDbgValue should not be emitted
Of which there are several legitimate combinations of meaning:
* The SDNode has been invalidated and we should emit "DBG_VALUE undef"
* The SDNode has been invalidated but the debug data was salvaged, don't
emit anything for this SDDbgValue
* This SDDbgValue has been emitted
This patch introduces distinct "Emitted" and "Invalidated" fields to the
SDDbgValue class, updates users accordingly, and generates "undef"
DBG_VALUEs for invalidated records. Awkwardly, there are circumstances
where we emit SDDbgValue's twice, specifically DebugInfo/X86/dbg-addr-dse.ll
which I've preserved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55372
llvm-svn: 348751
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39926.
The size of the first copy was computed as
std::abs(std::abs(LdDisp2) - std::abs(LdDisp1)), which results in
skipped bytes if the signs of LdDisp2 and LdDisp1 differ. As far as
I can see, this should just be LdDisp2 - LdDisp1. The case where
LdDisp1 > LdDisp2 is already handled in the code above, in which case
LdDisp2 is set to LdDisp1 and this subtraction will evaluate to
Size1 = 0, which is the correct value to skip an overlapping copy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55485
llvm-svn: 348750
Summary: This should avoid failing on old CPUs that do not have a cycle counter.
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55416
llvm-svn: 348740
Summary: The comment says we need 3 extracts and a select at the end. But didn't we just account for the select in the vector cost above. Aren't we just extracting the single element after taking the min/max in the vector register?
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, ABataev
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55480
llvm-svn: 348739
Both intrinsics do the exact same thing so we really only need one.
Earlier in the 8.0 cycle we changed the signature of this intrinsic without renaming it. But it looks difficult to get the autoupgrade code to allow me to merge the intrinsics and change the signature at the same time. So I've renamed the intrinsic slightly for the new merged intrinsic. I'm skipping autoupgrading from the previous new to 8.0 signature. I've also renamed the subborrow for consistency.
llvm-svn: 348737
Since TBEHandler doesn't maintain state or otherwise have any need to be
a class right now, the read and write functions have been moved out and
turned into standalone functions. Additionally, the TBE read function
has been updated to return an Expected value for better error handling.
Tests have been updated to reflect these changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55450
llvm-svn: 348735
Summary:
When bugpoint attempts to find the other executables it needs to run,
such as `opt` or `clang`, it tries searching the user's PATH. However,
in many cases, the 'bugpoint' executable is part of an LLVM build, and
the 'opt' executable it's looking for is in that same directory.
Many LLVM tools handle this case by using the `Paths` parameter of
`llvm::sys::findProgramByName`, passing the parent path of the currently
running executable. Do this same thing for bugpoint. However, to
preserve the current behavior exactly, first search the user's PATH,
and then search for 'opt' in the directory containing 'bugpoint'.
Test Plan:
`check-llvm`. Many of the existing bugpoint tests no longer need to use the
`--opt-command` option as a result of these changes.
Reviewers: MatzeB, silvas, davide
Reviewed By: MatzeB, davide
Subscribers: davide, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54884
llvm-svn: 348734
Summary:
`llvm::AttributeList` and `llvm::AttributeSet` are immutable, and so methods
defined on these classes, such as `addAttribute`, return a new immutable
object with the attribute added. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D55217 I attempted
to annotate methods such as `addAttribute` with `LLVM_NODISCARD`, since
calling these methods has no side-effects, and so ignoring the result
that is returned is almost certainly a programmer error.
However, committing the change resulted in new warnings in the AMDGPU target.
The AMDGPU simplify libcalls pass added in https://reviews.llvm.org/D36436
attempts to add the readonly and nounwind attributes to simplified
library functions, but instead calls the `addAttribute` methods and
ignores the result.
Modify the simplify libcalls pass to actually add the nounwind and
readonly attributes. Also update the simplify libcalls test to assert
that these attributes are actually being set.
Reviewers: rampitec, vpykhtin, rnk
Reviewed By: rampitec
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55435
llvm-svn: 348732
This trait is used by several AST visitor classes to control whether the AST is visiting const nodes or non-const nodes. These uses cannot be easily replaced with the STL traits directly due to use of an unspecialized templated when a type is expected (due to the template template parameter involved).
llvm-svn: 348729
Someday we'd like to remove old autoupgrade code so it helps to annotate how long its been there so we don't have to go digging through commit history.
llvm-svn: 348728
Previously we had to take the carry in and add -1 to it to set the carry flag so we could use it with ADC/SBB. But if we know its 0 then we don't need to bother.
This should go a long way towards fixing PR24545.
llvm-svn: 348727
The dependency was added in r213995 in response to r213986 which did make
X86/Utils depend on IR, but r256680 later removed that dependency again.
llvm-svn: 348724
The existing code tries to handle an undef operand while transforming an add to an LEA,
but it's incomplete because we will crash on the i16 test with the debug output shown below.
It's better to just give up instead. Really, GlobalIsel should have folded these before we
could get into trouble.
# Machine code for function add_undef_i16: NoPHIs, TracksLiveness, Legalized, RegBankSelected, Selected
bb.0 (%ir-block.0):
liveins: $edi
%1:gr32 = COPY killed $edi
%0:gr16 = COPY %1.sub_16bit:gr32
%5:gr64_nosp = IMPLICIT_DEF
%5.sub_16bit:gr64_nosp = COPY %0:gr16
%6:gr64_nosp = IMPLICIT_DEF
%6.sub_16bit:gr64_nosp = COPY %2:gr16
%4:gr32 = LEA64_32r killed %5:gr64_nosp, 1, killed %6:gr64_nosp, 0, $noreg
%3:gr16 = COPY killed %4.sub_16bit:gr32
$ax = COPY killed %3:gr16
RET 0, implicit killed $ax
# End machine code for function add_undef_i16.
*** Bad machine code: Reading virtual register without a def ***
- function: add_undef_i16
- basic block: %bb.0 (0x7fe6cd83d940)
- instruction: %6.sub_16bit:gr64_nosp = COPY %2:gr16
- operand 1: %2:gr16
LLVM ERROR: Found 1 machine code errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54710
llvm-svn: 348722
Extension to rL348617, turns out llvm-exegesis doesn't need to match the perf counter name against a scheduler model resource name - so I've added a few more counters that I could find in the libpfm4 source code (and fix a typo in the knl/knm retired_uops counter - which uses 'all' instead of 'any').
llvm-svn: 348721
The test file shows a case where the avoid store forwarding block
pass misses to copy a range (-1..1) when the load displacement
changes sign.
Baseline test for D55485.
llvm-svn: 348712
PE/COFF sections can have section names truncated to 8 chars, in order to
have the name available at runtime. (The string table, where long untruncated
names are stored, isn't loaded at runtime.)
This allows various llvm tools to dump the .eh_frame section from such
executables.
Patch by Peiyuan Song!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55407
llvm-svn: 348708
This is effectively re-committing the changes from:
rL347917 (D54640)
rL348195 (D55126)
...which were effectively reverted here:
rL348604
...because the code had a bug that could induce infinite looping
or eventual out-of-memory compilation.
The bug was that this code did not guard against transforming
opaque constants. More details are in the post-commit mailing
list thread for r347917. A reduced test for that is included
in the x86 bool-math.ll file. (I wasn't able to reduce a PPC
backend test for this, but it was almost the same pattern.)
Original commit message for r347917:
The motivating case for this is shown in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32023
and the corresponding rot16.ll regression tests.
Because x86 scalar shift amounts are i8 values, we can end up with trunc-binop-trunc
sequences that don't get folded in IR.
As the TODO comments suggest, there will be regressions if we extend this (for x86,
we mostly seem to be missing LEA opportunities, but there are likely vector folds
missing too). I think those should be considered existing bugs because this is the
same transform that we do as an IR canonicalization in instcombine. We just need
more tests to make those visible independent of this patch.
llvm-svn: 348706
Summary:
WasmSignature used to use its `WasmSignature` member variable only for
function types, but now it also can be used for events as well.
Reviewers: sbc100
Subscribers: dschuff, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55247
llvm-svn: 348702
Summary:
This anoymous function actually has same logic with `Obj->toMappedAddr`.
Besides, I have a question on resolving illegal value. `gnu-readelf`, `gnu-objdump` and `llvm-objdump` could parse the test file 'test/tools/llvm-objdump/Inputs/private-headers-x86_64.elf', but `llvm-readobj` will fail when parse `DT_RELR` segment. Because, the value is 0x87654321 which is illegal. So, shall we do this clean up rather then remove the checking statements inside anoymous function?
```
if (Delta >= Phdr.p_filesz)
return createError("Virtual address is not in any segment");
```
Reviewers: rupprecht, jhenderson
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55329
llvm-svn: 348701
These nodes should have two results. A real VT and a Glue. But this code would have returned Undef which would only be a single result. But we're in the single result version of getNode so these opcodes should never be seen by this function anyway.
llvm-svn: 348670
It seems to be unexpectedly passing on some bots probably because it requires asserts to fail, but doesn't say that. But we already have a patch in review to make it not xfail so I'd rather just focus on getting it passing rather than trying to figure out an unexpected pass.
llvm-svn: 348661
We were still using the rounded down offset and alignment even though
they aren't handled because you can't trivially bitcast the loaded
value.
llvm-svn: 348658
