LoweSELECT will detect the constant inputs and convert to scalar
selects, but we can do it directly here.
I might remove some of the code from LowerSELECT and move it to
DAG combine so doing this explicitly will make us less dependent
on it happening in lowering.
Summary:
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D71901.
The fifth in a series of patches that ports the LLVM coroutines passes
to the new pass manager infrastructure.
The first 4 patches allow users to run coroutine passes by invoking, for
example `opt -passes=coro-early`. However, most of LLVM's tests for
coroutines use an option, `opt -enable-coroutines`, which adds all 4
coroutine passes to the appropriate legacy pass manager extension points.
This patch does the same, but using the new pass manager: when
coroutine features are enabled and the new pass manager is being used,
this adds the new-pass-manager-compliant coroutine passes to the pass
builder's pipeline.
This allows us to run all coroutine tests using the new pass manager
(besides those that use the coroutine retcon ABI used by the Swift
compiler, which is not yet supported in the new pass manager).
Reviewers: GorNishanov, lewissbaker, chandlerc, junparser, wenlei
Subscribers: wenlei, EricWF, Prazek, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71902
Summary:
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D71900.
The fourth in a series of patches that ports the LLVM coroutines passes
to the new pass manager infrastructure. This patch implements
'coro-cleanup'.
No existing regression tests check the behavior of coro-cleanup on its
own, so this patch adds one. (A test named 'coro-cleanup.ll' exists, but
it relies on the entire coroutines pipeline being run. It's updated to
test the new pass manager in the 5th patch of this series.)
Reviewers: GorNishanov, lewissbaker, chandlerc, junparser, deadalnix, wenlei
Reviewed By: wenlei
Subscribers: wenlei, EricWF, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71901
Summary:
This patch teaches llvm-dwp to parse DWARFv5 info section header.
Tested this using asm test case caontaining DWARFv5 info.
Assemling it to DWO object, checking corresponding content using llvm-dwarfdump. Then finally, packaging it
to DWP using llvm-dwp and again checking corresponding content using llvm-dwarfdump.
Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, probinson.
Reviewed By: dblaikie.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74425
A future MC change may add a warning/error when a .section directive
specifies incorrect sh_flags/sh_type. Fix the tests to use correct
sh_flags/sh_type.
After having committed https://reviews.llvm.org/D72226, 2 buildbots
running GCC 5.4.0 began failing. The cause was the order in which those
compilers evaluated the left- and right-hand sides of the expression
`RC.SCCIndices[C] = RC.SCCIndices.size();`. This commit splits the
expression into multiple statements to avoid ambiguity, and adds a test
case that exercises the code that caused the test failures on those
older compilers (which was originally included in the reviewed patch,
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72226).
Summary:
Extends the multivalue call infrastructure to tail calls, removes all
legacy calls specialized for particular result types, and removes the
CallIndirectFixup pass, since all indirect call arguments are now
fixed up directly in the post-insertion hook.
In order to keep supporting pretty-printed defs and uses in test
expectations, MCInstLower now inserts an immediate containing the
number of defs for each call and call_indirect. The InstPrinter is
updated to query this immediate if it is present and determine which
MCOperands are defs and uses accordingly.
Depends on D72902.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, mgorny, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74192
Summary:
There is still room for improvement in the handling of multivalue
nodes in both passes, but the current algorithm is at least correct
and optimizes some simpler cases. In order to make future
optimizations of these passes easier and build confidence that the
current algorithms are correct, this CL also adds a script that
automatically and exhaustively generates interesting multivalue test
cases.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72902
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67133
While investigating some non determinism (CSE doesn't produce wrong
code, it just doesn't CSE some times) in GISel CSE on an out of tree
target, I realized that the core issue was that there were lots of code
that mutates (setReg, setRegClass etc), but doesn't notify observers
(CSE in this case but this could be any other observer). In order to
make the Observer be available in various parts of code and to avoid
having to thread it through various API, the MachineFunction now has the
observer as field. This allows it to be easily used in helper functions
such as constrainOperandRegClass.
Also added some invariant verification method in CSEInfo which can
catch these issues (when CSE is enabled).
Essentially, fold OrderedBasicBlock into BasicBlock, and make it
auto-invalidate the instruction ordering when new instructions are
added. Notably, we don't need to invalidate it when removing
instructions, which is helpful when a pass mostly delete dead
instructions rather than transforming them.
The downside is that Instruction grows from 56 bytes to 64 bytes. The
resulting LLVM code is substantially simpler and automatically handles
invalidation, which makes me think that this is the right speed and size
tradeoff.
The important change is in SymbolTableTraitsImpl.h, where the numbering
is invalidated. Everything else should be straightforward.
We probably want to implement a fancier re-numbering scheme so that
local updates don't invalidate the ordering, but I plan for that to be
future work, maybe for someone else.
Reviewed By: lattner, vsk, fhahn, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51664
There is prior art for this in the code base itself, and a recent
example of this here: c45f8d49897f
This came up in discussion on this review where @maskray was going the
opposite direction:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68772
Given that there is disagreement, we should make a choice and document
it.
Thanks to John McCall for the precise wording.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74515
Summary:
Unlike normal calls, call_indirects have immediate arguments that
caused a MachineVerifier failure without a small tweak to loosen the
verifier's requirements for variadicOpsAreDefs instructions.
One nice thing about the new call_indirects is that they do not need
to participate in the PCALL_INDIRECT mechanism because their post-isel
hook handles moving the function pointer argument and adding the flags
and typeindex arguments itself.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74191
This reverts commit 8acedb595d039f68ad15f9e5f2e6cb79729307e4 and
relands a prerequisite for the patch series culminating in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D74192.
This reverts commit 649aba93a27170cb03a4b17c98a19b9237a880b8, now that
the approach started there has been shown to be workable in the patch
series culminating in https://reviews.llvm.org/D74192.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44922 (caused by 4698bf145d583e26ed438026ef7fde031ef322b1)
ThreadThroughTwoBasicBlocks assumes PredBBBranch is conditional. The following code can segfault.
AddPHINodeEntriesForMappedBlock(PredBBBranch->getSuccessor(1), PredBB, NewBB,
ValueMapping);
We can also allow unconditional PredBB, but the produced code is not
better.
Reviewed By: kazu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74747
Summary:
This patch adds a new MVE intrinsics family, `vbrsrq`: vector bit
reverse and shift right. The intrinsics are compiled into the VBRSR
instruction. Two new LLVM IR intrinsics were also added: arm.mve.vbrsr
and arm.mve.vbrsr.predicated.
Reviewers: simon_tatham, dmgreen, ostannard, MarkMurrayARM
Reviewed By: simon_tatham
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74721
The index of an ExtractElementInst is not guaranteed to be a
ConstantInt. It can be any integer value. Check explicitly for
ConstantInts.
The new test cases illustrate scenarios where we crash without
this patch. I've also added another test case to check the matching
of extractelement vector ops works.
Reviewers: RKSimon, ABataev, dtemirbulatov, vporpo
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74758
When simplifying demanded bits, we currently only report the
instruction on which SimplifyDemandedBits was called as changed.
However, this is a recursive call, and the actually modified
instruction will usually be further up the chain. Additionally,
all the intermediate instructions should also be revisited,
as additional combines may be possible after the demanded bits
simplification. We fix this by explicitly adding them back to the
worklist.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72944
The select-of-cttz transform can currently duplicate cttz intrinsics
and zext/trunc ops. The cause is that it unnecessarily duplicates
the intrinsic and the zext/trunc when setting the "undef_on_zero"
flag to false. However, it's always legal to set the flag from true
to false, so we can make this replacement even if there are extra users.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74685
Create preprocessor defines for callee saved floating-point register spill
slots, vector register spill slots, and both 32-bit and 64-bit general
purpose register spill slots. This is an NFC refactor to prepare for
adding ABI compliant callee saves and restores for AIX.
Fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44754. We already have
a fold that converts icmp (and (ashr X, C3), C2), C1 into
icmp (and C2'), C1', but it imposed overly strict requirements on the
transform.
Relax this by checking that both C2 and C1 don't shift out bits
(in a signed sense) when forming the new constants.
Alive proofs (https://rise4fun.com/Alive/PTz0):
Name: ashr_legal
Pre: ((C2 << C3) >> C3) == C2 && ((C1 << C3) >> C3) == C1
%a = ashr i16 %x, C3
%b = and i16 %a, C2
%c = icmp i16 %b, C1
=>
%d = and i16 %x, C2 << C3
%c = icmp i16 %d, C1 << C3
Name: ashr_shiftout_eq
Pre: ((C2 << C3) >> C3) == C2 && ((C1 << C3) >> C3) != C1
%a = ashr i16 %x, C3
%b = and i16 %a, C2
%c = icmp eq i16 %b, C1
=>
%c = false
Note that >> corresponds to ashr here. The case of an equality
comparison has some special handling in this transform, because
it will form to a true/false result if the condition on the comparison
constant it violated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74294
Implement TargetLowering callback mayBeEmittedAsTailCall for riscv in CodeGenPrepare,
which will duplicate return instructions to enable tailcall optimization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73699
Summary:
Making `Scale` a `TypeSize` in AArch64InstrInfo::getMemOpInfo,
has the effect that all places where this information is used
(notably, TargetInstrInfo::getMemOperandWithOffset) will need
to consider Scale - and derived, Offset - possibly being scalable.
This patch adds a new operand `bool &OffsetIsScalable` to
TargetInstrInfo::getMemOperandWithOffset and fixes up all
the places where this function is used, to consider the
offset possibly being scalable.
In most cases, this means bailing out because the algorithm does not
(or cannot) support scalable offsets in places where it does some
form of alias checking for example.
Reviewers: rovka, efriedma, kristof.beyls
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: wuzish, kerbowa, MatzeB, arsenm, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72758
