There is a latent Windows kernel bug, the exact trigger
conditions are not well understood, which can cause a file
to be correctly written, but unable to be correctly read.
The workaround appears to be simply calling FlushFileBuffers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42925
llvm-svn: 325274
Use the FunctionType of the callee when it's available. It may not be
available for synthetic calls to functions specified by external symbols.
llvm-svn: 325269
The reference '&' is missing in the function parameter. If there are
back-to-back optimizations in terms of dag node list like below:
t29: i64,ch = load<LD4[bitcast (%struct.test_t* @test.t to i8*)+12](dereferenceable), zext from i32> t3, t43, undef:i64
t34: i64,ch = load<LD4[bitcast (%struct.test_t* @test.t to i8*)](dereferenceable), zext from i32> t3, t41, undef:i64
The bug will trigger a segfault for the added test case remove_truncate_5.ll:
LLVMSymbolizer: error reading file: No such file or directory
#0 0x000000000241c4d9 (llc+0x241c4d9)
#1 0x000000000241c56a (llc+0x241c56a)
#2 0x000000000241aa50 (llc+0x241aa50)
...
#22 0x0000000000fd5edf (llc+0xfd5edf)
#23 0x00007f0fe03bec05 __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x21c05)
#24 0x0000000000fd3e69 (llc+0xfd3e69)
...
Segmentation fault
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 325267
The FunctionType of the callee is always available, even if the Function
of the callee is not. Use that to get the number of fixed parameters.
llvm-svn: 325259
The variable name 'AllowReassociate' is a lie at this point because
it's set to 'isFast()' which is more than the 'reassoc' FMF after
rL317488.
In D41286, we showed that this transform may be valid even with strict
math by brute force checking every 32-bit float result.
There's a potential problem here because we're replacing with a tan()
libcall rather than a hypothetical LLVM tan intrinsic. So we might
set errno when we should be guaranteed not to do that. But that's
independent of this change.
llvm-svn: 325247
Summary:
In LLVM, 't' selects a floating-point/SIMD register and only supports
32-bit values. This is appropriately documented in the LLVM Language
Reference Manual. However, this behaviour diverges from that of GCC, where
't' selects the s0-s31 registers and its qX and dX variants depending on
additional operand modifiers (q/P).
For example, the following C code:
#include <arm_neon.h>
float32x4_t a, b, x;
asm("vadd.f32 %0, %1, %2" : "=t" (x) : "t" (a), "t" (b))
results in the following assembly if compiled with GCC:
vadd.f32 s0, s0, s1
whereas LLVM will show "error: couldn't allocate output register for
constraint 't'", since a, b, x are 128-bit variables, not 32-bit.
This patch extends the use of 't' to mean that of GCC, thus allowing
selection of the lower Q vector regs and their D/S variants. For example,
the earlier code will now compile as:
vadd.f32 q0, q0, q1
This behaviour still differs from that of GCC but I think it is actually
more correct, since LLVM picks up the right register type based on the
datatype of x, while GCC would need an extra operand modifier to achieve
the same result, as follows:
asm("vadd.f32 %q0, %q1, %q2" : "=t" (x) : "t" (a), "t" (b))
Since this is only an extension of functionality, existing code should not
be affected by this change. Note that operand modifiers q/P are already
supported by LLVM, so this patch should suffice to support inline
assembly with constraint 't' originally built for GCC.
Reviewers: grosbach, rengolin
Reviewed By: rengolin
Subscribers: rogfer01, efriedma, olista01, aemerson, javed.absar, eraman, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42962
llvm-svn: 325244
We can use PACKSS to saturate each stage of the chain: PACKSSDW down to [-32768,32767] and then PACKSSWB to [-128,127].
PACKUS is a little trickier and will be handled in a separate patch.
llvm-svn: 325235
This is mainly a move of simplifyShuffleOperands from DAGCombiner::visitVECTOR_SHUFFLE to create a more general purpose TargetLowering::SimplifyDemandedVectorElts implementation.
Further features can be moved/added in future patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42896
llvm-svn: 325232
Analysis of fails in the case of out of memory errors can be tricky on
Windows. Such error emerges at the point where memory allocation function
fails, but manifests itself when null pointer is used. These two points
may be distant from each other. Besides, next runs may not exhibit
allocation error.
Usual programming practice does not require checking result of 'operator
new' because it throws 'std::bad_alloc' in the case of allocation error.
However, LLVM is usually built with exceptions turned off, so 'new' can
return null pointer. This change installs custom new handler, which causes
fatal error in the case of out of memory. The handler is installed
automatically prior to call to 'main' during construction of a static
object defined in 'lib/Support/ErrorHandling.cpp'. If the application does
not use this file, the handler may be installed manually by a call to
'llvm::install_out_of_memory_new_handler', declared in
'include/llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h".
There are calls to C allocation functions, malloc, calloc and realloc.
They are used for interoperability with C code, when allocated object has
variable size and when it is necessary to avoid call of constructors. In
many calls the result is not checked against null pointer. To simplify
checks, new functions are defined in the namespace 'llvm' with the
same names as these C function. These functions produce fatal error if
allocation fails. User should use 'llvm::malloc' instead of 'std::malloc'
in order to use the safe variant. This change replaces 'std::malloc'
in the cases when the result of allocation function is not checked against
null pointer.
Finally, there are plain C code, that uses malloc and similar functions. If
the result is not checked, assert statements are added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43010
llvm-svn: 325224
There is a more powerful but still simple function `isKnownViaSimpleReasoning ` that
does constant range check and few more additional checks. We use it some places (e.g.
when proving implications) and in some other places we only check constant ranges.
Currently, indvar simplifier fails to remove the check in following loop:
int inc = ...;
for (int i = inc, j = inc - 1; i < 200; ++i, ++j)
if (i > j) { ... }
This patch replaces all usages of `isKnownPredicateViaConstantRanges` with
`isKnownViaSimpleReasoning` to have smarter proofs. In particular, it fixes the
case above.
Reviewed-By: sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43175
llvm-svn: 325214
Some ELF files produced by lld may have zero-size segment placeholders as shown
below. Since GNU_STACK Offset is 0, the current code makes it the lowest used
offset, and relocates all the segments over the ELF header. The resulting
binary is total garbage.
This change fixes how llvm-objcopy handles PT_PHDR properlly by treating ELF
headers and the program header table as segments to allow the layout algorithm
decide where those should go.
Author: vit9696
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42872
llvm-svn: 325189
Summary:
TypeID summaries are used by CFI and need to be serialized by ThinLTO
indexing for later use by LTO Backend.
Reviewers: tejohnson, pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42611
llvm-svn: 325182
The bound instruction does not have reversed operands in gas.
Fixes PR27653.
Patch by Maya Madhavan.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43243
llvm-svn: 325178
While there, change a bunch of helper functions to take references to
avoid adding calls to get().
This should conclude the bugpoint yak shaving.
llvm-svn: 325177
