LLVM's targets need to know if stack pointer adjustments occur after the
prologue. This is needed to correctly determine if the red-zone is
appropriate to use or if a frame pointer is required.
Normally, LLVM can figure this out very precisely by reasoning about the
contents of the MachineFunction. There is an interesting corner case:
inline assembly.
The vast majority of inline assembly which will perform a push or pop is
done so to pair up with pushf or popf as appropriate. Unfortunately,
this inline assembly doesn't mark the stack pointer as clobbered
because, well, it isn't. The stack pointer is decremented and then
immediately incremented. Because of this, LLVM was changed in r256456
to conservatively assume that inline assembly contain a sequence of
stack operations. This is unfortunate because the vast majority of
inline assembly will not end up manipulating the stack pointer in any
way at all.
Instead, let's provide a more principled solution: an intrinsic.
FWIW, other compilers (MSVC and GCC among them) also provide this
functionality as an intrinsic.
llvm-svn: 256685
Not folding these cases tends to avoid partial register updates:
sqrtss (%eax), %xmm0
Has a partial update of %xmm0, while
movss (%eax), %xmm0
sqrtss %xmm0, %xmm0
Has a clobber of the high lanes immediately before the partial update,
avoiding a potential stall.
Given this, we only want to fold when optimizing for size.
This is consistent with the patterns we already have for some of
the fp/int converts, and in X86InstrInfo::foldMemoryOperandImpl()
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15741
llvm-svn: 256671
The cost is calculated for all X86 targets. When gather/scatter instruction
is not supported we calculate the cost of scalar sequence.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15677
llvm-svn: 256519
This adds support for the MCU psABI in a way different from r251223 and r251224,
basically reverting most of these two patches. The problem with the approach
taken in r251223/4 is that it only handled libcalls that originated from the backend.
However, the mid-end also inserts quite a few libcalls and assumes these use the
platform's default calling convention.
The previous patch tried to insert inregs when necessary both in the FE and,
somewhat hackily, in the CG. Instead, we now define a new default calling convention
for the MCU, which doesn't use inreg marking at all, similarly to what x86-64 does.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15054
llvm-svn: 256494
lower broadcast<type>x<vector> to shuffles.
there are two cases:
1.src is 128 bits and dest is 512 bits: in this case we will lower it to shuffle with imm = 0.
2.src is 256 bit and dest is 512 bits: in this case we will lower it to shuffle with imm = 01000100b (0x44) that way we will broadcast the 256bit source: ymm[0,1,2,3] => zmm[0,1,2,3,0,1,2,3] then it will mask it with the passthru value (in case it's mask op).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15790
llvm-svn: 256490
I believe this also fixes a case where a 64-bit memory form that is documented as being unsupported in 32-bit mode was able to be selected there.
llvm-svn: 256483
Fix TRUNCATE lowering vector to vector i1, use LSB and not MSB.
Implement VPMOVB/W/D/Q2M intrinsic.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15675
llvm-svn: 256470
A frame pointer must be used if stack pointer is modified after the
prologue. LLVM will emit pushf/popf if we need to save/restore the
FLAGS register, requiring us to have a frame pointer for the function.
There is a small twist: this sequence might exist in user code via
inline-assembly. For now, conservatively assume that such functions
require a frame pointer. For real world justification, please see
clang's implementation of __readeflags.
This fixes PR25945.
llvm-svn: 256456
The patterns that set a mask register to 0/1
KXOR %kn, %kn, %kn / KXNOR %kn, %kn, %kn
are replaced with
KXOR %k0, %k0, %kn / KXNOR %k0, %k0, %kn - AVX-512 targets optimization.
KNL does not recognize dependency-breaking idioms for mask registers,
so kxnor %k1, %k1, %k2 has a RAW dependence on %k1.
Using %k0 as the undef input register is a performance heuristic based
on the assumption that %k0 is used less frequently than the other mask
registers, since it is not usable as a write mask.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15739
llvm-svn: 256365
First step towards making better use of AVX's implicit zeroing of the upper half of a 256-bit vector by instructions that only act on the lower 128-bit vector - discussed on D14151.
As well as the fact that 128-bit shuffle instructions are generally more capable, this can be performant for older CPUs with 128-bit ALUs (e.g. Jaguar, Sandy Bridge) that must treat 256-bit vectors as multiple micro-ops.
Moved the similar subvector extraction shuffle combines from PerformShuffleCombine256 to lowerVectorShuffle as well.
Note: I've avoided combining shuffles that reference elements from the upper halves of the input vectors - this may be reviewed in future work as well (AVX1 would probably always gain, but AVX2 does have some cross-lane shuffle instructions).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15477
llvm-svn: 256332
