if (N1.getOpcode() == ISD::LOAD &&
N1.hasOneUse() &&
!CodeGenMap.count(N1.getValue(0)) &&
!CodeGenMap.count(N1.getValue(1))) {
instead of this:
if (N1.getOpcode() == ISD::LOAD) {
if (N1.hasOneUse()) {
if (!CodeGenMap.count(N1.getValue(0))) {
if (!CodeGenMap.count(N1.getValue(1))) {
llvm-svn: 25763
"if" statements (indenting it appropriately, of course) instead of using goto's.
This inverts the logic for all of the if statements, which makes things simpler
to understand in addition to making the generated code easier to read.
llvm-svn: 25757
directly to the output file. This makes things simple because the code doesn't
have to worry about indentation or the case when there is no goto. It also
allows us to indent the code better without touching everything :)
llvm-svn: 25756
If store's chain operand is load, then use load's chain operand instead. If
it isn't (likely a TokenFactor), then do not allow the folding.
llvm-svn: 25708
has already been selected. The number of use check is not strong enough since
a node can be replaced with newly created target node. e.g. If the original
node has two uses, when it is selected for one of the uses it is replaced with
another. Each node now has a single use but isel still should not fold it.
llvm-svn: 25651
instruction to produce a result. e.g MUL8m, the instruction does not
produce a explicit result. However it produces an implicit result in
AL which would be copied to a temp. The root operator of the matching
pattern is a mul so the use would expect it to produce a result.
llvm-svn: 25458
SNDPOutFlag to DAG nodes. These properties do not belong to target specific
instructions.
* Added DAG node property SNDPOptInFlag. It's same as SNDPInFlag except it's
optional. Used by ret / call, etc.
llvm-svn: 25154
SDOperand Tmp0,Tmp1,Tmp2,Tmp3,;
GCC has a bug (24907) in which is fails to catch this, but VC++ correctly
notes its illegality, so tblgen must be taught to only generate legal C++.
llvm-svn: 25075
Currently tblgen cannot tell which operands in the operand list are results so
it assumes the first one is a result. This is bad. Ideally we would fix this
by separating results from inputs, e.g. (res R32:$dst),
(ops R32:$src1, R32:$src2). But that's a more distruptive change. Adding
'let noResults = 1' is the workaround to tell tblgen that the instruction does
not produces a result. It works for now since tblgen does not support
instructions which produce multiple results.
llvm-svn: 25017
