Since function definitions are not loaded into the address space, PT_LOAD is
inappropriate. PT_WEBASSEMBLY_FUNCTIONS is used to identify where the function
definitions are so that they can be processed at program startup time.
llvm-svn: 257436
Currently WebAssembly has two kinds of relocations; data addresses and
function addresses. This adds ELF relocations for them, as well as an
MC symbol kind to indicate which type of relocation is needed.
llvm-svn: 257416
Address review feedback from r255909.
Move body of resolveCycles(bool AllowTemps) to
resolveRecursivelyImpl(bool AllowTemps). Revert resolveCycles back
to asserting on temps, and add new resolveNonTemporaries interface
to invoke the new implementation with AllowTemps=true. Document
the differences between these interfaces, specifically the effect
on RAUW support and uniquing. Call appropriate interface from
ValueMapper.
llvm-svn: 257389
When asan is enabled, we poison slabs as we allocate them, and only unpoison the pieces
we need from the slab.
However, in Reset, we were failing to reset the state of the slab back to being poisoned.
Patch by b17 c0de.
llvm-svn: 257388
After these revisions, for arm targets, the -mcpu=xscale option caused
an error: "the clang compiler does not support '-mcpu=xscale'". Adding
"v5e" as a SUB_ARCH in ARMTargetParser.def helps.
Submitted by: Andrew Turner
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16043
llvm-svn: 257376
I'm still seeing GCC ICE locally, but figured I'd throw this at the wall
& see if it sticks for the bots at least. Will continue investigating
the ICE in any case.
llvm-svn: 257367
The new ORC remote-JITing support provides a superset of the old code's
functionality, so we can replace the old stuff. As a bonus, a couple of
previously XFAILed tests have started passing.
llvm-svn: 257343
This patch adds utilities to ORC for managing a remote JIT target. It consists
of:
1. A very primitive RPC system for making calls over a byte-stream. See
RPCChannel.h, RPCUtils.h.
2. An RPC API defined in the above system for managing memory, looking up
symbols, creating stubs, etc. on a remote target. See OrcRemoteTargetRPCAPI.h.
3. An interface for creating high-level JIT components (memory managers,
callback managers, stub managers, etc.) that operate over the RPC API. See
OrcRemoteTargetClient.h.
4. A helper class for building servers that can handle the RPC calls. See
OrcRemoteTargetServer.h.
The system is designed to work neatly with the existing ORC components and
functionality. In particular, the ORC callback API (and consequently the
CompileOnDemandLayer) is supported, enabling lazy compilation of remote code.
Assuming this doesn't trigger any builder failures, a follow-up patch will be
committed which tests these utilities by using them to replace LLI's existing
remote-JITing demo code.
llvm-svn: 257305
This is a more generic version of the MCJITMemoryManager::notifyObjectLoaded
method: It provides only a RuntimeDyld reference (rather than an
ExecutionEngine), and so can be used with ORC JIT stacks.
llvm-svn: 257296
RuntimeDyld::MemoryManager.
The RuntimeDyld::MemoryManager::reserveAllocationSpace method is called when
object files are loaded, and gives clients a chance to pre-allocate memory for
all segments. Previously only the size of each segment (code, ro-data, rw-data)
was supplied but not the alignment. This hasn't caused any problems so far, as
most clients allocate via the MemoryBlock interface which returns page-aligned
blocks. Adding alignment arguments enables finer grained allocation while still
satisfying alignment restrictions.
llvm-svn: 257294
MSVC seems to have problems looking up Value inside of the template. Not
really sure whether that's a bug there or Clang and GCC being too
permissive.
llvm-svn: 257288
type.
This makes it easy and safe to use a set of flags as one elmenet of
a tagged union with pointers. There is quite a bit of code that has
historically done this by casting arbitrary integers to "pointers" and
assuming that this was safe and reliable. It is neither, and has started
to rear its head by triggering safety asserts in various abstractions
like PointerLikeTypeTraits when the integers chosen are invariably poor
choices for *some* platform and *some* situation. Not to mention the
(hopefully unlikely) prospect of one of these integers actually getting
allocated!
With this, it will be straightforward to build type safe abstractions
like this without being error prone. The abstraction itself is also
remarkably simple thanks to the implicit conversion.
This use case and pattern was also independently created by the folks
working on Swift, and they're going to incrementally add any missing
functionality they find.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15844
llvm-svn: 257284
This is a much more general and powerful form of PointerUnion. It
provides a reasonably complete sum type (from type theory) for
pointer-like types. It has several significant advantages over the
existing PointerUnion infrastructure:
1) It allows more than two pointer types to participate without awkward
nesting structures.
2) It directly exposes the tag so that it is convenient to write
switches over the possible members.
3) It can re-use the same type for multiple tag values, something that
has been worked around by either abusing PointerIntPair or defining
nonce types and doing unsafe pointer casting.
4) It supports customization of the PointerLikeTypeTraits used for
specific member types. This means it could (in theory) be used even
with types that are over-aligned on allocation to expose larger
numbers of bits to the tag.
All in all, I think it is at least complimentary to the existing
infrastructure, and a strict improvement for some use cases.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15843
llvm-svn: 257282
JumpThreading's runOnFunction is supposed to return true if it made any
changes. JumpThreading has a call to removeUnreachableBlocks which may
result in changes to the IR but runOnFunction didn't appropriate account
for this possibility, leading to badness.
While we are here, make sure to call LazyValueInfo::eraseBlock in
removeUnreachableBlocks; JumpThreading preserves LVI.
This fixes PR26096.
llvm-svn: 257279
managers.
Prior to this patch, recursive finalization (where finalization of one
RuntimeDyld instance triggers finalization of another instance on which the
first depends) could trigger memory access failures: When the inner (dependent)
RuntimeDyld instance and its memory manager are finalized, memory allocated
(but not yet relocated) by the outer instance is locked, and relocation in the
outer instance fails with a memory access error.
This patch adds a latch to the RuntimeDyld::MemoryManager base class that is
checked by a new method: RuntimeDyld::finalizeWithMemoryManagerLocking, ensuring
that shared memory managers are only finalized by the outermost RuntimeDyld
instance.
This allows ORC clients to supply the same memory manager to multiple calls to
addModuleSet. In particular it enables the use of user-supplied memory managers
with the CompileOnDemandLayer which must reuse the supplied memory manager for
each function that is lazily compiled.
llvm-svn: 257263
It's strange that LoopInfo mostly owns the Loop objects, but that it
defers deleting them to the loop pass manager. Instead, change the
oddly named "updateUnloop" to "markAsRemoved" and have it queue the
Loop object for deletion. We can't delete the Loop immediately when we
remove it, since we need its pointer identity still, so we'll mark the
object as "invalid" so that clients can see what's going on.
llvm-svn: 257191
Due to the new in-place ThinLTO symbol handling support added in
r257174, we now invoke renameModuleForThinLTO on the current
module from within the FunctionImport pass.
Additionally, renameModuleForThinLTO no longer needs to return the
Module as it is performing the renaming in place on the one provided.
This commit will be immediately preceeded by a companion clang patch to
remove its invocation of renameModuleForThinLTO.
llvm-svn: 257181
Summary:
Move ThinLTO global value processing functions out of ModuleLinker and
into a new ThinLTOGlobalProcessor class, which performs any necessary
linkage and naming changes on the given module in place.
As a result, renameModuleForThinLTO no longer needs to create a new
Module when performing any necessary local to global promotion on a
module that we are possibly exporting from during a ThinLTO backend
compilation.
During function importing the ThinLTO processing is still invoked from
the ModuleLinker (via the new class), as it needs to perform renaming and
linkage changes on the source module, e.g. in order to get the correct
renaming during local to global promotion.
Reviewers: joker.eph
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15696
llvm-svn: 257174
a top-down manner into a true top-down or RPO pass over the call graph.
There are specific patterns of function attributes, notably the
norecurse attribute, which are most effectively propagated top-down
because all they us caller information.
Walk in RPO over the call graph SCCs takes the form of a module pass run
immediately after the CGSCC pass managers postorder walk of the SCCs,
trying again to deduce norerucrse for each singular SCC in the call
graph.
This removes a very legacy pass manager specific trick of using a lazy
revisit list traversed during finalization of the CGSCC pass. There is
no analogous finalization step in the new pass manager, and a lazy
revisit list is just trying to produce an RPO iteration of the call
graph. We can do that more directly if more expensively. It seems
unlikely that this will be the expensive part of any compilation though
as we never examine the function bodies here. Even in an LTO run over
a very large module, this should be a reasonable fast set of operations
over a reasonably small working set -- the function call graph itself.
In the future, if this really is a compile time performance issue, we
can look at building support for both post order and RPO traversals
directly into a pass manager that builds and maintains the PO list of
SCCs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15785
llvm-svn: 257163
