Avoid unnecessary std::string creations during TypeSetByHwMode::writeToStream.
Found during investigations into PR28222
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38174
llvm-svn: 313983
Combine CMOV[i16]<-[SIGN,ZERO,ANY]_EXTEND to [i32,i64] into CMOV[i32,i64].
One example of where it is useful is:
before (20 bytes)
<foo>:
test $0x1,%dil
mov $0x307e,%ax
mov $0xffff,%cx
cmovne %ax,%cx
movzwl %cx,%eax
retq
after (18 bytes)
<foo>:
test $0x1,%dil
mov $0x307e,%ecx
mov $0xffff,%eax
cmovne %ecx,%eax
retq
Reviewers: craig.topper, aaboud, spatel, RKSimon, zvi
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36711
llvm-svn: 313982
We've found a serious issue with the current implementation of loop predication.
The current implementation relies on SCEV and this turned out to be problematic.
To fix the problem we had to rework the pass substantially. We have had the
reworked implementation in our downstream tree for a while. This is the initial
patch of the series of changes to upstream the new implementation.
For now the transformation is limited to the following case:
* The loop has a single latch with either ult or slt icmp condition.
* The step of the IV used in the latch condition is 1.
* The IV of the latch condition is the same as the post increment IV of the guard condition.
* The guard condition is ult.
See the review or the LoopPredication.cpp header for the details about the
problem and the new implementation.
Reviewed By: sanjoy, mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37569
llvm-svn: 313981
This patch re-commits the patch that was pulled out due to a
problem it caused, but with a fix for the problem. The fix
was reviewed separately by Eric Christopher and Hal Finkel.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38054
llvm-svn: 313978
For the following function:
double fn1(double d0, double d1, double d2) {
double a = -d0 - d1 * d2;
return a;
}
on ARM, LLVM generates code along the lines of
vneg.f64 d0, d0
vmls.f64 d0, d1, d2
i.e., a negate and a multiply-subtract.
The attached patch adds instruction selection patterns to allow it to generate the single instruction
vnmla.f64 d0, d1, d2
(multiply-add with negation) instead, like GCC does.
Committed on behalf of @gergo- (Gergö Barany)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35911
llvm-svn: 313972
Summary: Previously we would dereference Symtab without checking for null.
Reviewers: davide, atanasyan, rafael
Reviewed By: davide, atanasyan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38080
llvm-svn: 313970
This patch adds the -o and --out-file options for compatibility with
Darwin's dwarfdump.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38125
llvm-svn: 313969
This patch adds instruction patterns for operations in BPF_ALU. After this,
assembler could recognize some 32-bit ALU statement. For example, those listed
int the unit test file.
Separate MOV patterns are unnecessary as MOV is ALU operation that could reuse
ALU encoding infrastructure, this patch removed those redundant patterns.
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 313961
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 313960
Arithmetic and jump instructions, load and store instructions are sharing
the same 8-bit code field encoding,
A better instruction pattern implemention could be the following inheritance
relationships, and each layer only encoding those fields which start to
diverse from that layer. This avoids some redundant code.
InstBPF -> TYPE_ALU_JMP -> ALU/JMP
InstBPF -> TYPE_LD_ST -> Load/Store
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 313959
Currently, eBPF backend is using some constant directly in instruction patterns,
This patch replace them with mnemonics and removed some unnecessary temparary
variables.
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 313958
The previous SwiftCC support for AAPCS64 was partially correct. It
setup swiftself parameters in the proper register but failed to setup
swifterror in the correct register. This would break compilation of
swift code for non-Darwin AAPCS64 conforming environments.
llvm-svn: 313956
There were two issues, one Python 3 specific related to Unicode,
and another which is that the tool substitution for lld no longer
rejected matches where a / preceded the tool name.
llvm-svn: 313928
This patch adds a pass that removes the computation of provably redundant
expressions that have been computed earlier in a previous iteration. It
relies on the use of PHIs to identify loop carried dependences.
This is scalar replacement for vector types.
llvm-svn: 313925
in the second slice of a Mach-O universal file.
The code in llvm-objdump in in DisassembleMachO() was getting the default
CPU then incorrectly setting into the global variable used for the -mcpu option
if that was not set. This caused a second call to DisassembleMachO() to use
the wrong default CPU when disassembling the next slice in a Mach-O universal
file. And would result in bad disassembly and an error message about an
recognized processor for the target:
% llvm-objdump -d -m -arch all fat.macho-armv7s-arm64
fat.macho-armv7s-arm64 (architecture armv7s):
(__TEXT,__text) section
armv7:
0: 60 47 bx r12
fat.macho-armv7s-arm64 (architecture arm64):
'cortex-a7' is not a recognized processor for this target (ignoring processor)
'cortex-a7' is not a recognized processor for this target (ignoring processor)
(__TEXT,__text) section
___multc3:
0: .long 0x1e620810
rdar://34439149
llvm-svn: 313921
debuginfo-tests has need to reuse a lot of common configuration
from clang and lld, and in general it seems like all of the
projects which are tightly coupled (e.g. lld, clang, llvm, lldb,
etc) can benefit from knowing about one other. For example,
lldb needs to know various things about how to run clang in its
test suite. Since there's a lot of common substitutions and
operations that need to be shared among projects, sinking this
up into LLVM makes sense.
In addition, this patch introduces a function add_tool_substitution
which handles all the dirty intricacies of matching tool names
which was previously copied around the various config files. This
is now a simple straightforward interface which is hard to mess
up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37944
llvm-svn: 313919
This has gone back and forth, but it seems this is necessary
after all. realpath is not sufficient because if you have a
file named 'C:\foo.txt', then both realpath('c:\foo.txt') and
realpath(C:\foo.txt') return the string that was passed to them
exactly as is, meaning the case of the drive-letter won't match.
The problem before was not that we were normalizing the case of
items going into the config map, but rather that we were
normalizing the case of something we needed to print. The value
that is used to key on the config map should never be printed.
llvm-svn: 313918
Summary:
Avoid using XZR/WZR directly as operands to split stores of zero
vectors. Doing so can lead to the XZR/WZR being used by an instruction
that doesn't allow it (e.g. add).
Fixes bug 34674.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, efriedma, MatzeB
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, javed.absar, mcrosier, eraman, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38146
llvm-svn: 313916
The previous version of dumper implemented UTF-16 byte swap incorrectly
on big-endian machines. This now gets fixed.
Thanks to Bill Seurer for testing the patch locally.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38150
llvm-svn: 313912
This patch adds dumping of line table instructions as well as the final
state at each specified pc value in verbose mode. This is essentially
the same as the default in Darwin's dwarfdump. Dumping the actual line
table opcodes can be particularly useful for something like debugging a
bad `.debug_line` section.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37971
llvm-svn: 313910
At least for the 64-bit and less case, we should be able to determine if we even have a mask without counting any bits. This also removes the need to explicitly check for 0 active bits, isMask will return false for 0.
llvm-svn: 313908
The fix is to avoid invalidating our insertion point in
replaceDbgDeclare:
Builder.insertDeclare(NewAddress, DIVar, DIExpr, Loc, InsertBefore);
+ if (DII == InsertBefore)
+ InsertBefore = &*std::next(InsertBefore->getIterator());
DII->eraseFromParent();
I had to write a unit tests for this instead of a lit test because the
use list order matters in order to trigger the bug.
The reduced C test case for this was:
void useit(int*);
static inline void inlineme() {
int x[2];
useit(x);
}
void f() {
inlineme();
inlineme();
}
llvm-svn: 313905
Summary:
SelectionDAGISel::LowerArguments is associating arguments
with frame indices (FuncInfo->setArgumentFrameIndex). That
information is later on used by EmitFuncArgumentDbgValue to
create DBG_VALUE instructions that denotes that a variable
can be found on the stack.
I discovered that for our (big endian) out-of-tree target
the association created by SelectionDAGISel::LowerArguments
sometimes is wrong. I've seen this happen when a 64-bit value
is passed on the stack. The argument will occupy two stack
slots (frame index X, and frame index X+1). The fault is
that a call to setArgumentFrameIndex is associating the
64-bit argument with frame index X+1. The effect is that the
debug information (DBG_VALUE) will point at the least significant
part of the arguement on the stack. When printing the
argument in a debugger I will get the wrong value.
I managed to create a test case for PowerPC that seems to
show the same kind of problem.
The bugfix will look at the datalayout, taking endianness into
account when examining a BUILD_PAIR node, assuming that the
least significant part is in the first operand of the BUILD_PAIR.
For big endian targets we should use the frame index from
the second operand, as the most significant part will be stored
at the lower address (using the highest frame index).
Reviewers: bogner, rnk, hfinkel, sdardis, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: nemanjai, aprantl, llvm-commits, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37740
llvm-svn: 313901
