This is the first of many commits that enable selectively dumping just
one record from the debug info.
This reapplies r313412 with some extra qualification to appease GCC and MSVC.
llvm-svn: 313419
* Fix an unsigned integer overflow in the logic that computes the
number of uncovered lines in a function.
* When aggregating region and line coverage summaries, take into account
that different instantiations may have a different number of regions.
The new test case provides test coverage for both bugs. I also verified
this change by preparing a coverage report for a stage2 build of llc --
the new assertions should detect any outstanding over-counting bugs.
Fixes PR34613.
llvm-svn: 313417
There's a bug in the way the line and region summary objects are merged.
It would have been less likely to occur if those objects kept some data
private.
llvm-svn: 313416
The "NotCovered" fields in the region and line summary structs are
redundant. We should remove them to make the code clearer.
As a follow-up, the "NotCovered" entries should be removed from the
reports as well.
llvm-svn: 313415
Static alloca usually doesn't generate any machine instructions, so it has 0 cost.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37879
llvm-svn: 313410
CostModel.
The original patch added support for horizontal min/max reductions to
the SLP vectorizer.
This patch causes LLVM to miscompile fairly simple signed min
reductions. I have attached a test progrom to http://llvm.org/PR34635
that shows the behavior change after this patch. We found this in a test
for the open source Eigen library, but also in other code.
Unfortunately, the revert is moderately challenging. It required
reverting:
r313042: [SLP] Test with multiple uses of conditional op and wrong parent.
r312853: [SLP] Fix buildbots, NFC.
r312793: [SLP] Fix the warning about paths not returning the value, NFC.
r312791: [SLP] Support for horizontal min/max reduction.
And even then, I had to completely skip reverting the changes to TTI and
CostModel because r312832 rewrote so much of this code. Plus, the cost
modeling changes aren implicated in the miscompile, so they should be
fine and will just not be used until this gets re-introduced.
llvm-svn: 313409
This is a resubmission of r313270. It broke standalone builds of
compiler-rt because we were not correctly generating the llvm-lit
script in the standalone build directory.
The fixes incorporated here attempt to find llvm/utils/llvm-lit
from the source tree returned by llvm-config. If present, it
will generate llvm-lit into the output directory. Regardless,
the user can specify -DLLVM_EXTERNAL_LIT to point to a specific
lit.py on their file system. This supports the use case of
someone installing lit via a package manager. If it cannot find
a source tree, and -DLLVM_EXTERNAL_LIT is either unspecified or
invalid, then we print a warning that tests will not be able
to run.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37756
llvm-svn: 313407
Summary:
This comes up in optimized debug info for C++ programs that pass and
return objects indirectly by address. In these programs,
llvm.dbg.declare survives optimization, which causes us to emit indirect
DBG_VALUE instructions. The fast register allocator knows to insert
DW_OP_deref when spilling indirect DBG_VALUE instructions, but the
LiveDebugVariables did not until this change.
This fixes part of PR34513. I need to look into why this doesn't work at
-O0 and I'll send follow up patches to handle that.
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, probinson
Subscribers: qcolombet, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37911
llvm-svn: 313400
Summary:
Fixes PR34513.
Indirect DBG_VALUEs typically come from dbg.declares of non-trivially
copyable C++ objects that must be passed by address. We were already
handling the case where the virtual register gets allocated to a
physical register and is later spilled. That's what usually happens for
normal parameters that aren't NRVO variables: they usually appear in
physical register parameters, and are spilled later in the function,
which would correctly add deref.
NRVO variables are different because the dbg.declare can come much later
after earlier instructions cause the incoming virtual register to be
spilled.
Also, clean up this code. We only need to look at the first operand of a
DBG_VALUE, which eliminates the operand loop.
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, probinson
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37929
llvm-svn: 313399
Summary:
After r304661, module flag to record objective-c image info section is
encoded without whitespaces after comma. The new name is equivalent to
the old one, except that when LTO a module built by old compiler and a
module built by a new compiler, it will fail with conflicting values.
Fix the issue by removing whitespaces in bitcode upgrade path.
rdar://problem/34416934
Reviewers: compnerd
Reviewed By: compnerd
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, hans, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37909
llvm-svn: 313398
This means that we can honor -fdata-sections rather than
always creating a segment for each symbol.
It also allows for a followup change to add .init_array and friends.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37876
llvm-svn: 313395
As Eli pointed out (and I got wrong in the first place), langref says: "The
getelementptr returns a vector of pointers, instead of a single address, when one
or more of its arguments is a vector. In such cases, all vector arguments should
have the same number of elements, and every scalar argument will be effectively
broadcast into a vector during address calculation."
Costantfold for gep doesn't really take in account this paragraph, returning a
pointer instead of a vector of pointer which triggers an assertion in RAUW,
as we're trying to replace values with mistmatching types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37928
llvm-svn: 313394
Previously the 'Padding' argument was the number of padding
bytes to add. However most callers that use 'Padding' know
how many overall bytes they need to write. With the previous
code this would mean encoding the LEB once to find out how
many bytes it would occupy and then using this to calulate
the 'Padding' value.
See: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36595
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37494
llvm-svn: 313393
It enables OptimizationRemarkEmitter::allowExtraAnalysis and MachineOptimizationRemarkEmitter::allowExtraAnalysis to return true not only for -fsave-optimization-record but when specific remarks are requested with
command line options.
The diagnostic handler used to be callback now this patch adds a class
DiagnosticHandler. It has virtual method to provide custom diagnostic handler
and methods to control which particular remarks are enabled.
However LLVM-C API users can still provide callback function for diagnostic handler.
llvm-svn: 313390
It enables OptimizationRemarkEmitter::allowExtraAnalysis and MachineOptimizationRemarkEmitter::allowExtraAnalysis to return true not only for -fsave-optimization-record but when specific remarks are requested with
command line options.
The diagnostic handler used to be callback now this patch adds a class
DiagnosticHandler. It has virtual method to provide custom diagnostic handler
and methods to control which particular remarks are enabled.
However LLVM-C API users can still provide callback function for diagnostic handler.
llvm-svn: 313382
- Create helper function for resolving weak references.
- Add test that preproduces the crash.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37916
llvm-svn: 313381
This caused PR34629: asserts firing when building Chromium. It also broke some
buildbots building test-suite as reported on the commit thread.
> Summary:
> 1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
> extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
> appearing in the DAG.
> e.g.
> T1 = A + B
> T2 = T1 + 10
> T3 = T2 + A
> For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
> Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
>
> 2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
> so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
> could be factored out.
> e.g.
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
> will be factored as following
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
>
> 3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
> thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
>
> Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet
>
> Reviewed By: lsaba
>
> Subscribers: spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 313376
Summary:
The checksums had already been placed in the IR, this patch allows
MCCodeView to actually write it out to an MCStreamer.
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37157
llvm-svn: 313374
The early out for AVX2 in lowerV2X128VectorShuffle is positioned in a weird spot below some shuffle mask equivalency checks.
But I think we want to allow VPERMQ for any unary shuffle.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37893
llvm-svn: 313373
When handling a v64i1 build vector of constants on 32-bit targets we were creating an illegal i64 constant that we then bitcasted back to v64i1. We need to instead create two 32-bit constants, bitcast them to v32i1 and concat the result. We should also take care to handle the halves being all zeros/ones after the split.
This patch splits the build vector and then recursively lowers the two pieces. This allows us to handle the all ones and all zeros cases with minimal effort. Ideally we'd just do the split and concat, and let lowering get called again on the new nodes, but getNode has special handling for CONCAT_VECTORS that reassembles the pieces back into a single BUILD_VECTOR. Hopefully the two temporary BUILD_VECTORS we had to create to do this that don't get returned don't cause any issues.
Fixes PR34605.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37858
llvm-svn: 313366
Currently if we're inserting 0s into the upper elements of a vector register we insert an explicit move of the smaller register to implicitly zero the upper bits. But if we can prove that they are already zero we can skip that. This is based on a similar idea of what we do to avoid emitting explicit zero extends for GR32->GR64.
Unfortunately, this is harder for vector registers because there are several opcodes that don't have VEX equivalent instructions, but can write to XMM registers. Among these are SHA instructions and a MMX->XMM move. Bitcasts can also get in the way.
So for now I'm starting with explicitly allowing only VPMADDWD because we emit zeros in combineLoopMAddPattern. So that is placing extra instruction into the reduction loop.
I'd like to allow PSADBW as well after D37453, but that's currently blocked by a bitcast. We either need to peek through bitcasts or canonicalize insert_subvectors with zeros to remove bitcasts on the value being inserted.
Longer term we should probably have a cleanup pass that removes superfluous zeroing moves even when the producer is in another basic block which is something these isel tricks can't do. See PR32544.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37653
llvm-svn: 313365
Add a profitability heuristic to enable runtime unrolling of multi-exit
loop: There can be atmost two unique exit blocks for the loop and the
second exit block should be a deoptimizing block. Also, there can be one
other exiting block other than the latch exiting block. The reason for
the latter is so that we limit the number of branches in the unrolled
code to being at most the unroll factor. Deoptimizing blocks are rarely
taken so these additional number of branches created due to the
unrolling are predictable, since one of their target is the deopt block.
Reviewers: apilipenko, reames, evstupac, mkuper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Reviewed by: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35380
llvm-svn: 313363
This removes the duplicate HVX instruction set for the 128-byte mode.
Single instruction set now works for both modes (64- and 128-byte).
llvm-svn: 313362
During runtime unrolling on loops with multiple exits, we update the
exit blocks with the correct phi values from both original and remainder
loop.
In this process, we lookup the VMap for the mapped incoming phi values,
but did not update the VMap if a default entry was generated in the VMap
during the lookup. This default value is generated when constants or
values outside the current loop are looked up.
This patch fixes the assertion failure when null entries are present in
the VMap because of this lookup. Added a testcase that showcases the
problem.
llvm-svn: 313358
This adds support for allowing v8f16 vector types, thus avoiding conversions
from/to single precision for these types. This is a follow up patch of
commits r311154 and r312104, which added support for scalars and v4f16
types, respectively.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37802
llvm-svn: 313351
removing them"
This was temporarily reverted, but now that the fix has been commited (r313197)
it should be put back in place.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34502
This reverts commit 9ef93d9dc4c51568e858cf8203cd2c5ce8dca796.
llvm-svn: 313349
Patch tries to improve vectorization of the following code:
void add1(int * __restrict dst, const int * __restrict src) {
*dst++ = *src++;
*dst++ = *src++ + 1;
*dst++ = *src++ + 2;
*dst++ = *src++ + 3;
}
Allows to vectorize even if the very first operation is not a binary add, but just a load.
Reviewers: spatel, mzolotukhin, mkuper, hfinkel, RKSimon, filcab, ABataev, davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits, RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28907
llvm-svn: 313348
Summary:
1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
appearing in the DAG.
e.g.
T1 = A + B
T2 = T1 + 10
T3 = T2 + A
For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
could be factored out.
e.g.
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
will be factored as following
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet
Reviewed By: lsaba
Subscribers: spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 313343
Summary:
For readers unfamiliar with the XRay code base, reference the compiler-rt
implementation even though we're not allowed to share any code and explain
our little-endian views more clearly.
For code clarity either get rid of obvious comments or explain their
intentions, fix typos, correct coding style according to LLVM's standards
and manually CSE long expressions to point out it is the same expression.
Reviewers: dberris
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34339
llvm-svn: 313340
