On modern cores with lfiw[az]x, we can fold a sign or zero extension from i32
to i64 into the load necessary for an i64 -> fp conversion.
llvm-svn: 225493
As pointed out by Aditya (and Owen), when we elide an FP extend to form an FMA,
we need to extend the incoming operands so that the resulting node will really
be legal. This is currently enabled only for PowerPC, and it happens to work
there regardless, but this should fix the functionality for everyone else
should anyone else wish to use it.
llvm-svn: 225492
complements the new vector shuffle lowering code path. This flag,
naturally, is *off* because we've not tested or evaluated the results of
this at all. However, the flag will make it much easier to evaluate
whether we can be this aggressive and whether there are missing vector
shuffle lowering optimizations.
llvm-svn: 225491
This was used previously for metadata but is no longer needed there. Not
doing this simplifies ValueHandle and will make it easier to fix things
like AssertingVH's DenseMapInfo.
llvm-svn: 225487
As pointed out by Aditya (and Owen), there are two things wrong with this code.
First, it adds patterns which elide FP extends when forming FMAs, and that might
not be profitable on all targets (it belongs behind the pre-existing
aggressive-FMA-formation flag). This is fixed by this change.
Second, the resulting nodes might have operands of different types (the
extensions need to be re-added). That will be fixed in the follow-up commit.
llvm-svn: 225485
Previously, MemDepPrinter handled volatile and unordered accesses without involving MemoryDependencyAnalysis. By making a slight tweak to the documented interface - which is respected by both callers - we can move this responsibility to MDA for the benefit of any future callers. This is basically just cleanup.
In the future, we may decide to extend MDA's non local dependency analysis to return useful results for ordered or volatile loads. I believe (but have not really checked in detail) that local dependency analyis does get useful results for ordered, but not volatile, loads.
llvm-svn: 225483
Previously, MemoryDependenceAnalysis::getNonLocalPointerDependency was taking a list of properties about the instruction being queried. Since I'm about to need one more property to be passed down through the infrastructure - I need to know a query instruction is non-volatile in an inner helper - fix the interface once and for all.
I also added some assertions and behaviour clarifications around volatile and ordered field accesses. At the moment, this is mostly to document expected behaviour. The only non-standard instructions which can currently reach this are atomic, but unordered, loads and stores. Neither ordered or volatile accesses can reach here.
The call in GVN is protected by an isSimple check when it first considers the load. The calls in MemDepPrinter are protected by isUnordered checks. Both utilities also check isVolatile for loads and stores.
llvm-svn: 225481
Create new copies of distinct `MDNode`s instead of following the
uniquing `MDNode` logic.
Just like self-references (or other cycles), `MapMetadata()` creates a
new node. In practice most calls use `RF_NoModuleLevelChanges`, in
which case nothing is duplicated anyway.
Part of PR22111.
llvm-svn: 225476
Propagate whether `MDNode`s are 'distinct' through the other types of IR
(assembly and bitcode). This adds the `distinct` keyword to assembly.
Currently, no one actually calls `MDNode::getDistinct()`, so these nodes
only get created for:
- self-references, which are never uniqued, and
- nodes whose operands are replaced that hit a uniquing collision.
The concept of distinct nodes is still not quite first-class, since
distinct-ness doesn't yet survive across `MapMetadata()`.
Part of PR22111.
llvm-svn: 225474
MachineLICM uses a callback named hasLowDefLatency to determine if an
instruction def operand has a 'low' latency. If all relevant operands have a
'low' latency, the instruction is considered too cheap to hoist out of loops
even in low-register-pressure situations. On PowerPC cores, both the embedded
cores and the others, there is no reason to believe that this is a good choice:
all instructions have a cost inside a loop, and hoisting them when not limited
by register pressure is a reasonable default.
llvm-svn: 225471
Add a command-line option to enable hoisting even cheap instructions (in
low-register-pressure situations). This is turned off by default, but has
proved useful for testing purposes.
llvm-svn: 225470
The assert was being triggered when the distance between a constant pool entry
and its user exceeded the maximally allowed distance after thumb2 branch
shortening. A padding was inserted after a thumb2 branch instruction was shrunk,
which caused the user to be out of range. This is wrong as the padding should
have been inserted by the layout algorithm so that the distance between two
instructions doesn't grow later during thumb2 instruction optimization.
This commit fixes the code in ARMConstantIslands::createNewWater to call
computeBlockSize and set BasicBlock::Unalign when a branch instruction is
inserted to create new water after a basic block. A non-zero Unalign causes
the worst-case padding to be inserted when adjustBBOffsetsAfter is called to
recompute the basic block offsets.
rdar://problem/19130476
llvm-svn: 225467
Summary: The PIC additions didn't update the prologue and epilogue code to save and restore r30 (PIC base register). This does that.
Test Plan: Tests updated.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6876
llvm-svn: 225450
This partially fixes PR13007 (ARM CodeGen fails with large stack
alignment): for ARM and Thumb2 targets, but not for Thumb1, as it
seems stack alignment for Thumb1 targets hasn't been supported at
all.
Producing an aligned stack pointer is done by zero-ing out the lower
bits of the stack pointer. The BIC instruction was used for this.
However, the immediate field of the BIC instruction only allows to
encode an immediate that can zero out up to a maximum of the 8 lower
bits. When a larger alignment is requested, a BIC instruction cannot
be used; llvm was silently producing incorrect code in this case.
This commit fixes code generation for large stack aligments by
using the BFC instruction instead, when the BFC instruction is
available. When not, it uses 2 instructions: a right shift,
followed by a left shift to zero out the lower bits.
The lowering of ARM::Int_eh_sjlj_dispatchsetup still has code
that unconditionally uses BIC to realign the stack pointer, so it
very likely has the same problem. However, I wasn't able to
produce a test case for that. This commit adds an assert so that
the compiler will fail the assert instead of silently generating
wrong code if this is ever reached.
llvm-svn: 225446
Its functionality has been replaced by calling
SIInstrInfo::legalizeOperands() from
SIISelLowering::AdjstInstrPostInstrSelection() and running the
SIFoldOperands and SIShrinkInstructions passes.
llvm-svn: 225445
The call lowering assumes that if the callee is a global, we want to emit a direct call.
This is correct for regular globals, but not for TLS ones.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6862
llvm-svn: 225438
PEI tries to keep track of how much starting or ending a call sequence adjusts the stack pointer by, so that it can resolve frame-index references. Currently, it takes a very simplistic view of how SP adjustments are done - both FrameStartOpcode and FrameDestroyOpcode adjust it exactly by the amount written in its first argument.
This view is in fact incorrect for some targets (e.g. due to stack re-alignment, or because it may want to adjust the stack pointer in multiple steps). However, that doesn't cause breakage, because most targets (the only in-tree exception appears to be 32-bit ARM) rely on being able to simplify the call frame pseudo-instructions earlier, so this code is never hit.
Moving the computation into TargetInstrInfo allows targets to override the way the adjustment is computed if they need to have a non-zero SPAdj.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6863
llvm-svn: 225437
A broken hint is a copy where both ends are assigned different colors. When a
variable gets evicted in the neighborhood of such copies, it is likely we can
reconcile some of them.
** Context **
Copies are inserted during the register allocation via splitting. These split
points are required to relax the constraints on the allocation problem. When
such a point is inserted, both ends of the copy would not share the same color
with respect to the current allocation problem. When variables get evicted,
the allocation problem becomes different and some split point may not be
required anymore. However, the related variables may already have been colored.
This usually shows up in the assembly with pattern like this:
def A
...
save A to B
def A
use A
restore A from B
...
use B
Whereas we could simply have done:
def B
...
def A
use A
...
use B
** Proposed Solution **
A variable having a broken hint is marked for late recoloring if and only if
selecting a register for it evict another variable. Indeed, if no eviction
happens this is pointless to look for recoloring opportunities as it means the
situation was the same as the initial allocation problem where we had to break
the hint.
Finally, when everything has been allocated, we look for recoloring
opportunities for all the identified candidates.
The recoloring is performed very late to rely on accurate copy cost (all
involved variables are allocated).
The recoloring is simple unlike the last change recoloring. It propagates the
color of the broken hint to all its copy-related variables. If the color is
available for them, the recoloring uses it, otherwise it gives up on that hint
even if a more complex coloring would have worked.
The recoloring happens only if it is profitable. The profitability is evaluated
using the expected frequency of the copies of the currently recolored variable
with a) its current color and b) with the target color. If a) is greater or
equal than b), then it is profitable and the recoloring happen.
** Example **
Consider the following example:
BB1:
a =
b =
BB2:
...
= b
= a
Let us assume b gets split:
BB1:
a =
b =
BB2:
c = b
...
d = c
= d
= a
Because of how the allocation work, b, c, and d may be assigned different
colors. Now, if a gets evicted to make room for c, assuming b and d were
assigned to something different than a.
We end up with:
BB1:
a =
st a, SpillSlot
b =
BB2:
c = b
...
d = c
= d
e = ld SpillSlot
= e
This is likely that we can assign the same register for b, c, and d,
getting rid of 2 copies.
** Performances **
Both ARM64 and x86_64 show performance improvements of up to 3% for the
llvm-testsuite + externals with Os and O3. There are a few regressions too that
comes from the (in)accuracy of the block frequency estimate.
<rdar://problem/18312047>
llvm-svn: 225422
type (in addition to the memory type).
The *LoadExt* legalization handling used to only have one type, the
memory type. This forced users to assume that as long as the extload
for the memory type was declared legal, and the result type was legal,
the whole extload was legal.
However, this isn't always the case. For instance, on X86, with AVX,
this is legal:
v4i32 load, zext from v4i8
but this isn't:
v4i64 load, zext from v4i8
Whereas v4i64 is (arguably) legal, even without AVX2.
Note that the same thing was done a while ago for truncstores (r46140),
but I assume no one needed it yet for extloads, so here we go.
Calls to getLoadExtAction were changed to add the value type, found
manually in the surrounding code.
Calls to setLoadExtAction were mechanically changed, by wrapping the
call in a loop, to match previous behavior. The loop iterates over
the MVT subrange corresponding to the memory type (FP vectors, etc...).
I also pulled neighboring setTruncStoreActions into some of the loops;
those shouldn't make a difference, as the additional types are illegal.
(e.g., i128->i1 truncstores on PPC.)
No functional change intended.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6532
llvm-svn: 225421
The register coalescer used to remove implicit_defs when they are
covered by the main range anyway. With subreg liveness tracking we can't
do that anymore in places where the IMPLICIT_DEF is required as begin of
a subregister liverange.
llvm-svn: 225416
I got confused and assumed SrcIdx/DstIdx of the CoalescerPair is a
subregister index in SrcReg/DstReg, but they are actually subregister
indices of the coalesced register that get you back to SrcReg/DstReg
when applied.
Fixed the bug, improved comments and simplified code accordingly.
Testcase by Tom Stellard!
llvm-svn: 225415
