Looks like the gcc in http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin11-self-mingw32/ doesn't like "not external linkage":
/Volumes/Macintosh_HD2/buildbots/clang-x86_64-darwin11-self-mingw32/llvm.src/include/llvm/Support/YAMLTraits.h: In instantiation of 'const bool llvm::yaml::has_SequenceMethodTraits<std::vector<<unnamed>::COFFYAML::Relocation, std::allocator<<unnamed>::COFFYAML::Relocation> > >::value':
/Volumes/Macintosh_HD2/buildbots/clang-x86_64-darwin11-self-mingw32/llvm.src/include/llvm/Support/YAMLTraits.h:281: instantiated from 'llvm::yaml::has_SequenceTraits<std::vector<<unnamed>::COFFYAML::Relocation, std::allocator<<unnamed>::COFFYAML::Relocation> > >'
/Volumes/Macintosh_HD2/buildbots/clang-x86_64-darwin11-self-mingw32/llvm.src/utils/yaml2obj/yaml2obj.cpp:627: instantiated from here
/Volumes/Macintosh_HD2/buildbots/clang-x86_64-darwin11-self-mingw32/llvm.src/include/llvm/Support/YAMLTraits.h:243: error: 'llvm::yaml::SequenceTraits<std::vector<<unnamed>::COFFYAML::Relocation, std::allocator<<unnamed>::COFFYAML::Relocation> > >::size' is not a valid template argument for type 'size_t (*)(llvm::yaml::IO&, std::vector<<unnamed>::COFFYAML::Relocation, std::allocator<<unnamed>::COFFYAML::Relocation> >&)' because function 'static size_t llvm::yaml::SequenceTraits<std::vector<<unnamed>::COFFYAML::Relocation, std::allocator<<unnamed>::COFFYAML::Relocation> > >::size(llvm::yaml::IO&, std::vector<<unnamed>::COFFYAML::Relocation, std::allocator<<unnamed>::COFFYAML::Relocation> >&)' has not external linkage
llvm-svn: 178600
A9 uses itinerary classes, Swift uses RW lists. This tripped some
verification when we're expanding variants. I had to refine the
verification a bit.
llvm-svn: 178357
This syntax is now preferred:
def : Pat<(subc i32:$b, i32:$c), (SUBCCrr $b, $c)>;
There is no reason to repeat the types in the output pattern.
llvm-svn: 177844
This makes it possible to define instruction patterns like this:
def LDri : F3_2<3, 0b000000,
(outs IntRegs:$dst), (ins MEMri:$addr),
"ld [$addr], $dst",
[(set i32:$dst, (load ADDRri:$addr))]>;
~~~
llvm-svn: 177834
Just like register classes, value types can be used in two ways in
patterns:
(sext_inreg i32:$src, i16)
In a named leaf node like i32:$src, the value type simply provides the
type of the node directly. This simplifies type inference a lot compared
to the current practice of specifiying types indirectly with register
classes.
As an unnamed leaf node, like i16 above, the value type represents
itself as an MVT::Other immediate.
llvm-svn: 177828
A register class can appear as a leaf TreePatternNode with and without a
name:
(COPY_TO_REGCLASS GPR:$src, F8RC)
In a named leaf node like GPR:$src, the register class provides type
information for the named variable represented by the node. The TypeSet
for such a node is the set of value types that the register class can
represent.
In an unnamed leaf node like F8RC above, the register class represents
itself as a kind of immediate. Such a node has the type MVT::i32,
we'll never create a virtual register representing it.
This change makes it possible to remove the special handling of
COPY_TO_REGCLASS in CodeGenDAGPatterns.cpp.
llvm-svn: 177825
To use this in conjunction with exuberant ctags to generate a single
combined tags file, run tblgen first and then
$ ctags --append [...]
Since some identifiers have corresponding definitions in C++ code,
it can be useful (if using vim) to also use cscope, and
:set cscopetagorder=1
so that
:tag X
will preferentially select the tablegen symbol, while
:cscope find g X
will always find the C++ symbol.
Patch by Kevin Schoedel!
(a couple small formatting changes courtesy of clang-format)
llvm-svn: 177682
Native Windows Python will do line ending translation by default, which
we don't want in bash scripts. If we're not native Windows Python, then
'b' is ignored.
llvm-svn: 177602
of complex instruction operands (e.g. address modes).
Currently, if a Pat pattern creates an instruction that has a complex
operand (i.e. one that consists of multiple sub-operands at the MI
level), this operand must match a ComplexPattern DAG pattern with the
correct number of output operands.
This commit extends TableGen to alternatively allow match a complex
operands against multiple separate operands at the DAG level.
This allows using Pat patterns to match pre-increment nodes like
pre_store (which must have separate operands at the DAG level) onto
an instruction pattern that uses a multi-operand memory operand,
like the following example on PowerPC (will be committed as a
follow-on patch):
def STWU : DForm_1<37, (outs ptr_rc:$ea_res), (ins GPRC:$rS, memri:$dst),
"stwu $rS, $dst", LdStStoreUpd, []>,
RegConstraint<"$dst.reg = $ea_res">, NoEncode<"$ea_res">;
def : Pat<(pre_store GPRC:$rS, ptr_rc:$ptrreg, iaddroff:$ptroff),
(STWU GPRC:$rS, iaddroff:$ptroff, ptr_rc:$ptrreg)>;
Here, the pair of "ptroff" and "ptrreg" operands is matched onto the
complex operand "dst" of class "memri" in the "STWU" instruction.
Approved by Jakob Stoklund Olesen.
llvm-svn: 177428
Properly handle cases where a group of instructions have different
SchedRW lists with the same itinerary class.
This was supposed to work, but I left in an early break.
llvm-svn: 177317
We always supported a mixture of the old itinerary model and new
per-operand model, but it required a level of indirection to map
itinerary classes to SchedRW lists. This was done for ARM A9.
Now we want to define x86 SchedRW lists, with the goal of removing its
itinerary classes, but still support the itineraries in the mean
time. When I original developed the model, Atom did not have
itineraries, so there was no reason to expect this requirement.
llvm-svn: 177226
Don't require instructions to inherit Sched<...>. Sometimes it is more
convenient to say:
let SchedRW = ... in {
...
}
Which is now possible.
llvm-svn: 177199
This allows abitrary groups of processor resources. Using something in
a subset automatically counts againts the superset. Currently, this
only works if the superset is also a ProcResGroup as opposed to a
SuperUnit.
This allows SandyBridge to be expressed naturally, which will be
checked in shortly.
def SBPort01 : ProcResGroup<[SBPort0, SBPort1]>;
def SBPort15 : ProcResGroup<[SBPort1, SBPort5]>;
def SBPort23 : ProcResGroup<[SBPort2, SBPort3]>;
def SBPort015 : ProcResGroup<[SBPort0, SBPort1, SBPort5]>;
llvm-svn: 177112
Fix the way resources are counted. I'm taking some time to cleanup the
way MachineScheduler handles in-order machine resources. Eventually
we'll need more PPC/Atom test cases in tree.
llvm-svn: 176390
These are two related changes (one in llvm, one in clang).
LLVM:
- rename address_safety => sanitize_address (the enum value is the same, so we preserve binary compatibility with old bitcode)
- rename thread_safety => sanitize_thread
- rename no_uninitialized_checks -> sanitize_memory
CLANG:
- add __attribute__((no_sanitize_address)) as a synonym for __attribute__((no_address_safety_analysis))
- add __attribute__((no_sanitize_thread))
- add __attribute__((no_sanitize_memory))
for S in address thread memory
If -fsanitize=S is present and __attribute__((no_sanitize_S)) is not
set llvm attribute sanitize_S
llvm-svn: 176075
For example, ARM has several instructions with a literal '#0' immediate in the syntax
that's not represented as an actual operand. The asm matcher is expected a token
operand, but the parser will have created an immediate operand. This is currently
handled by dedicated per-instruction C++ munging of the ParsedAsmOperand list, but
will be better handled by this hook.
llvm-svn: 174487
If an Apple llvmCore build is done without assertions, and a client uses
the llvmCore headers with assertions enabled, or vice versa, then things will
break because some of the structure sizes in the API are different. Use the
unifdef tool to make the headers unconditionally match the way the llvmCore
libraries were built.
llvm-svn: 174460
and enables the instruction printer to print aliased
instructions.
Due to usage of RegisterOperands a change in common
code (utils/TableGen/AsmWriterEmitter.cpp) is required
to get the correct register value if it is a RegisterOperand.
Contributer: Vladimir Medic
llvm-svn: 174358
Drive by fix. I noticed some missing logic that might bite future
users. This shouldn't affect the final output on currently modeled
targets.
llvm-svn: 174142
