This is used to test RemoveRedundantDbgInstrs(), which is used by other
passes.
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91477
This reverts the revert commit c8d73d939fa4fda9c87b3979225d02d63062bd68.
It includes a fix for cases where we missed inserting VPValues
for some selects, which should fix PR48142.
9218ff50f9 removed the BUILD.txt file, and as a subtle side-effect
libLLVMFrontendOpenACC wasn't a dependency of `ninja check` anymore.
However llvm-config requires all components to be built, and the
relevant test is broken when libLLVMFrontendOpenACC isn't built.
Unittest for libLLVMFrontendOpenACC are pending, but this addition
should fix some bots in the meantime.
Describe in the BackEnd Developer's Guide. Instrument a few backends.
Remove an old unused timing facility. Add a null backend for timing
the parser.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91388
This was changed recently with D90554 / f7eac51b9b3f
...because we had a regression testing blindspot for intrinsics
that are expected to be lowered to libcalls.
In general, we want the *size* cost for a scalar call to be cheap
even if the other costs are expensive - we expect it to just be
a branch with some optional stack manipulation.
It is likely that we will want to carve out some
exceptions/overrides to this rule as follow-up patches for
calls that have some general and/or target-specific difference
to the expected lowering.
This was noticed as a regression in unrolling, so we have a test
for that now along with a couple of direct cost model tests.
If the assumed scalarization costs for the oversized vector
calls are not realistic, that would be another follow-up
refinement of the cost models.
See discussion in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45073 / https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324#2334485
the implementation is known-broken for certain inputs,
the bugreport was up for a significant amount of timer,
and there has been no activity to address it.
Therefore, just completely rip out all of misexpect handling.
I suspect, fixing it requires redesigning the internals of MD_misexpect.
Should anyone commit to fixing the implementation problem,
starting from clean slate may be better anyways.
This reverts commit 7bdad08429411e7d0ecd58cd696b1efe3cff309e,
and some of it's follow-ups, that don't stand on their own.
This library is only used in Flang at the moment and not tested withing LLVM.
Having it as a component is breaking llvm-config:
$ bin/llvm-config --shared-mode
llvm-config: error: component libraries and shared library
llvm-config: error: missing: [...]/lib/libLLVMFrontendOpenACC.a
This will reverted when unit-tests are provided for it.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91470
This assertion ensures the input value isn't part of the vector when
growing is required. In such cases the vector will grow and the input
value is invalidated before being read from.
This found 14 failed Tests.
Reviewed By: bkramer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84293
When the load value is folded into the sin/cos operation, the
AMDGPU library calls simplifier could still mark the function
as unmodified. Instead ensure if there is an early return,
return whether the load was folded into the sin/cos call.
Authored by MJDSys
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91401
I'm not why it was added to DAGToDAG oringally but it seems
to make sense alongside the non-TLS version: LowerGlobalAddress
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91432
dependency. NFC
Use findSingleDependency in place of FindDependencies and stop passing a
set of Instructions around. Modify FindDependencies to return a boolean
flag which indicates whether the dependencies it has found are all
valid.
Add a convenience matcher which handles
```
G_XOR %not_reg, -1
```
And a convenience matcher which returns true if an integer constant is
all-ones.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91459
Make it required. Since it's a module pass, optnone won't test it, so
extend the clang test to also use opt-bisect now that it's supported.
14/16 check-dfsan tests failed with NPM enabled, now all pass.
Reviewed By: leonardchan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91385
ValueTracking was using a more powerful abs() implementation. Roll
it into KnownBits::abs(). Also add an exhaustive test for abs(),
in both the poisoning and non-poisoning variants.
Like inlineCallIfPossible and InlinerPass, after inlining mergeAttributesForInlining
should be called to merge callee's attributes to caller. But it is not called in
AlwaysInliner, causes caller's attributes inconsistent with inlined code.
Attached test case demonstrates that attribute "min-legal-vector-width"="512" is
not merged into caller without this patch, and it causes failure in SelectionDAG
when lowering the inlined AVX512 intrinsic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91446
When we see
```
%sub = G_SUB 0, %x
%select = G_SELECT %cc, %t, %sub
```
Fold away the G_SUB by producing
```
%select = CSNEG %t, %x, cc
```
Simple IR example: https://godbolt.org/z/K8TEnh
This is valid on both sides of the select, but for now, just handle one side.
It may make more sense to handle swapping sides during post-legalizer lowering.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90723
Reducing some code duplication.
We had a helper for checking if a predicate is unsigned. Remove that and use
the existing function in Instructions.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91288
Handle the emission of the add in a single place, instead of three
different ones.
Don't emit an unnecessary add with zero to start with. It will get
dropped by InstCombine, but we may as well not create it in the
first place. This also means that InstCombine does not need to
specially handle this extra add.
This is conceptually NFC, but can affect worklist order etc.
For example, during RAUW in IRMover, the `Function` ValueAsMetadata in "CG Profile" could become bitcast.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88433
It's fairly common to need matchers for a specific constant value, or for
common idioms like finding a negated register.
Add
- `m_SpecificICst`, which returns true when matching a specific value..
- `m_ZeroInt`, which returns true when an integer 0 is matched.
- `m_Neg`, which returns when a register is negated.
Also update a few places which use idioms related to the new matchers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91397
The SCEV code for constructing GEP expressions currently assumes
that the addition of the base and all the offsets is nsw if the GEP
is inbounds. While the addition of the offsets is indeed nsw, the
addition to the base address is not, as the base address is
interpreted as an unsigned value.
Fix the GEP expression code to not assume nsw for the base+offset
calculation. However, do assume nuw if we know that the offset is
non-negative. With this, we use the same behavior as the
construction of GEP addrecs does. (Modulo the fact that we
disregard SCEV unification, as the pre-existing FIXME points out).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90648
