This instructions doesn't have intrincis.
Added tests for lowering and encoding.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12317
llvm-svn: 249688
This fixes two separate bugs:
1) The mask for the high lane was not set correctly. That fixes PR24532.
2) The transformation should bail out if it believes it involves more than
2 lanes, as it does not currently do anything sensible in this case.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13505
llvm-svn: 249669
Summary:
- Add CoreCLR to if/else ladders and switches as appropriate.
- Rename isMSVCEHPersonality to isFuncletEHPersonality to better
reflect what it captures.
Reviewers: majnemer, andrew.w.kaylor, rnk
Subscribers: pgavlin, AndyAyers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13449
llvm-svn: 249455
The custom lowering in LowerExtendedLoad is doing the equivalent shuffle, so make use of existing lowering code to reduce duplication.
llvm-svn: 249243
The custom code produces incorrect results if later reassociated.
Since r221657, on x86, vNi32 uitofp is lowered using an optimized
sequence:
movdqa LCPI0_0(%rip), %xmm1 ## xmm1 = [65535, ...]
pand %xmm0, %xmm1
por LCPI0_1(%rip), %xmm1 ## [0x4b000000, ...]
psrld $16, %xmm0
por LCPI0_2(%rip), %xmm0 ## [0x53000000, ...]
addps LCPI0_3(%rip), %xmm0 ## [float -5.497642e+11, ...]
addps %xmm1, %xmm0
Since r240361, the machine combiner opportunistically reassociates
2-instruction sequences (with -ffast-math). In the new code sequence,
the ADDPS' are eligible. In isolation, for simple examples (without
reassociable users), this makes no performance difference (the goal
being to enable reassociation of longer chains).
In the trivial example (just one uitofp), the reassociation doesn't
happen, because (I think) it would require the emission of a separate
movaps for a constantpool load (instead of folding it into addps).
However, when we have multiple uitofp sequences, and the constantpool
loads are CSE'd earlier, the machine combiner can do the reassociation.
When the ADDPS' are reassociated, the resulting sequence isn't correct
anymore, as we'd be adding large (2**39) constants with comparatively
smaller values (~2**23). Given that two of the three inputs are powers
of 2 larger than 2**16, and that ulp(2**39) == 2**(39-24) == 2**15,
the reassociated chain will produce 0 for any input in [0, 2**14[.
In my testing, it also produces wrong results for 99.5% of [0, 2**32[.
Avoid this by disabling the new lowering when -ffast-math. It does
mean that we'll get slower code than without it, but at least we
won't get egregiously incorrect code.
One might argue that, considering -ffast-math is all but meaningless,
uitofp producing wrong results isn't a compiler bug. But it really is.
Fixes PR24512.
...though this is really more of a workaround.
Ideally, we'd have some sort of Machine FMF, but that's a problem
that's not worth tackling until we do more with machine IR.
llvm-svn: 248965
The Win64 unwinder disassembles forwards from each PC to try to
determine if this PC is in an epilogue. If so, it skips calling the EH
personality function for that frame. Typically, this means you cannot
catch an exception in the same frame that you threw it, because 'throw'
calls a noreturn runtime function.
Previously we avoided this problem with the TrapUnreachable
TargetOption, but that's a much bigger hammer than we need. All we need
is a 1 byte non-epilogue instruction right after the call. Instead,
what we got was an unconditional branch to a shared block containing the
ud2, potentially 7 bytes instead of 1. So, this reverts r206684, which
added TrapUnreachable, and replaces it with something better.
The new code pattern matches for invoke/call followed by unreachable and
inserts an int3 into the DAG. To be 100% watertight, we would need to
insert SEH_Epilogue instructions into all basic blocks ending in a call
with no terminators or successors, but in practice this is unlikely to
come up.
llvm-svn: 248959
The XOP shifts just have logical/arithmetic versions and the left/right shifts are controlled by whether the value is positive/negative. Because of this I've added new X86ISD nodes instead of trying to force them to use the existing shift nodes.
Additionally Excavator cores (bdver4) support XOP and AVX2 - meaning that it should use the AVX2 shifts when it can and fall back to XOP in other cases.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8690
llvm-svn: 248878
HHVM calling convention, hhvmcc, is used by HHVM JIT for
functions in translated cache. We currently support LLVM back end to
generate code for X86-64 and may support other architectures in the
future.
In HHVM calling convention any GP register could be used to pass and
return values, with the exception of R12 which is reserved for
thread-local area and is callee-saved. Other than R12, we always
pass RBX and RBP as args, which are our virtual machine's stack pointer
and frame pointer respectively.
When we enter translation cache via hhvmcc function, we expect
the stack to be aligned at 16 bytes, i.e. skewed by 8 bytes as opposed
to standard ABI alignment. This affects stack object alignment and stack
adjustments for function calls.
One extra calling convention, hhvm_ccc, is used to call C++ helpers from
HHVM's translation cache. It is almost identical to standard C calling
convention with an exception of first argument which is passed in RBP
(before we use RDI, RSI, etc.)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12681
llvm-svn: 248832
alignment requirements, for example in the case of vectors.
These requirements are exploited by the code generator by using
move instructions that have similar alignment requirements, e.g.,
movaps on x86.
Although the code generator properly aligns the arguments with
respect to the displacement of the stack pointer it computes,
the displacement itself may cause misalignment. For example if
we have
%3 = load <16 x float>, <16 x float>* %1, align 64
call void @bar(<16 x float> %3, i32 0)
the x86 back-end emits:
movaps 32(%ecx), %xmm2
movaps (%ecx), %xmm0
movaps 16(%ecx), %xmm1
movaps 48(%ecx), %xmm3
subl $20, %esp <-- if %esp was 16-byte aligned before this instruction, it no longer will be afterwards
movaps %xmm3, (%esp) <-- movaps requires 16-byte alignment, while %esp is not aligned as such.
movl $0, 16(%esp)
calll __bar
To solve this, we need to make sure that the computed value with which
the stack pointer is changed is a multiple af the maximal alignment seen
during its computation. With this change we get proper alignment:
subl $32, %esp
movaps %xmm3, (%esp)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12337
llvm-svn: 248786
Fix for D12561 - we weren't correctly ensuring that the base element for extension was moved to start on a boundary suitable for UNPCKL/H
llvm-svn: 248536
Add two new ways of accessing the unsafe stack pointer:
* At a fixed offset from the thread TLS base. This is very similar to
StackProtector cookies, but we plan to extend it to other backends
(ARM in particular) soon. Bionic-side implementation here:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/170988.
* Via a function call, as a fallback for platforms that provide
neither a fixed TLS slot, nor a reasonable TLS implementation (i.e.
not emutls).
This is a re-commit of a change in r248357 that was reverted in
r248358.
llvm-svn: 248405
The BEXTR comments didn't make sense before, we may want to extend the
FP logic transform to work on vectors, and this way is more beautiful.
llvm-svn: 248404
Add two new ways of accessing the unsafe stack pointer:
* At a fixed offset from the thread TLS base. This is very similar to
StackProtector cookies, but we plan to extend it to other backends
(ARM in particular) soon. Bionic-side implementation here:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/170988.
* Via a function call, as a fallback for platforms that provide
neither a fixed TLS slot, nor a reasonable TLS implementation (i.e.
not emutls).
llvm-svn: 248357
This patch generalizes the lowering of shuffles as zero extensions to allow extensions that don't start from the first element. It now recognises extensions starting anywhere in the lower 128-bits or at the start of any higher 128-bit lane.
The motivation was to reduce the number of high cost pshufb calls, but it also improves the SSE2 case as well.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12561
llvm-svn: 248250
Now that we have fast vector CTPOP implementations we can use this to speed up vector CTTZ using the pattern (cttz(x) = ctpop((x & -x) - 1))
Additionally, for AVX512CD that provides lzcnt instructions we can use the pattern (cttz_undef(x) = (width - 1) - ctlz(x & -x))
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12663
llvm-svn: 248091
This makes catchret look more like a branch, and less like a weird use
of BlockAddress. It also lets us get away from
llvm.x86.seh.restoreframe, which relies on the old parentfpoffset label
arithmetic.
llvm-svn: 247936
AVX-512 does not provide an instruction that shuffles mask register. So I do the following way:
mask-2-simd , shuffle simd , simd-2-mask
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12727
llvm-svn: 247876
After D10403, we had FMF in the DAG but disabled by default. Nick reported no crashing errors after some stress testing,
so I enabled them at r243687. However, Escha soon notified us of a bug not covered by any in-tree regression tests:
if we don't propagate the flags, we may fail to CSE DAG nodes because differing FMF causes them to not match. There is
one test case in this patch to prove that point.
This patch hopes to fix or leave a 'TODO' for all of the in-tree places where we create nodes that are FMF-capable. I
did this by putting an assert in SelectionDAG.getNode() to find any FMF-capable node that was being created without FMF
( D11807 ). I then ran all regression tests and test-suite and confirmed that everything passes.
This patch exposes remaining work to get DAG FMF to be fully functional: (1) add the flags to non-binary nodes such as
FCMP, FMA and FNEG; (2) add the flags to intrinsics; (3) use the flags as conditions for transforms rather than the
current global settings.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12095
llvm-svn: 247815
KNL does not have VXORPS, VORPS for 512-bit values.
I use integer VPXOR, VPOR that actually do the same.
X86ISD::FXOR/FOR are generated as a result of FSUB combining.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12753
llvm-svn: 247523
We used to have this magic "hasLoadLinkedStoreConditional()" callback,
which really meant two things:
- expand cmpxchg (to ll/sc).
- expand atomic loads using ll/sc (rather than cmpxchg).
Remove it, and, instead, introduce explicit callbacks:
- bool shouldExpandAtomicCmpXchgInIR(inst)
- AtomicExpansionKind shouldExpandAtomicLoadInIR(inst)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12557
llvm-svn: 247429
All of the complexity is in cleanupret, and it mostly follows the same
codepaths as catchret, except it doesn't take a return value in RAX.
This small example now compiles and executes successfully on win32:
extern "C" int printf(const char *, ...) noexcept;
struct Dtor {
~Dtor() { printf("~Dtor\n"); }
};
void has_cleanup() {
Dtor o;
throw 42;
}
int main() {
try {
has_cleanup();
} catch (int) {
printf("caught it\n");
}
}
Don't try to put the cleanup in the same function as the catch, or Bad
Things will happen.
llvm-svn: 247219
The 32-bit tables don't actually contain PC range data, so emitting them
is incredibly simple.
The 64-bit tables, on the other hand, use the same table for state
numbering as well as label ranges. This makes things more difficult, so
it will be implemented later.
llvm-svn: 247192
Summary: This patch modifies X86TargetLowering::LowerVASTART so that
struct va_list is initialized with 32 bit pointers in x32. It also
includes tests that call @llvm.va_start() for x32.
Patch by João Porto
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hjl.tools
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12346
llvm-svn: 247069
