- When extloading from a vector with non-byte-addressable element, e.g.
<4 x i1>, the current logic breaks. Extend the current logic to
fix the case where the element type is not byte-addressable by loading
all bytes, bit-extracting/packing each element.
llvm-svn: 175642
The PPC backend doesn't handle these correctly. This patch uses logic
similar to that in the X86 and ARM backends to track these arguments
properly.
llvm-svn: 175635
Add HexagonMCInst class which adds various Hexagon VLIW annotations.
In addition, this class also includes some APIs related to the
constant extenders.
llvm-svn: 175634
During lowering of a BUILD_VECTOR, we look for opportunities to use a
vector splat. When the splatted value fits in 5 signed bits, a single
splat does the job. When it doesn't fit in 5 bits but does fit in 6,
and is an even value, we can splat on half the value and add the result
to itself.
This last optimization hasn't been working recently because of improved
constant folding. To circumvent this, create a pseudo VADD_SPLAT that
can be expanded during instruction selection.
llvm-svn: 175632
sext <4 x i1> to <4 x i64>
sext <4 x i8> to <4 x i64>
sext <4 x i16> to <4 x i64>
I'm running Combine on SIGN_EXTEND_IN_REG and revert SEXT patterns:
(sext_in_reg (v4i64 anyext (v4i32 x )), ExtraVT) -> (v4i64 sext (v4i32 sext_in_reg (v4i32 x , ExtraVT)))
The sext_in_reg (v4i32 x) may be lowered to shl+sar operations.
The "sar" does not exist on 64-bit operation, so lowering sext_in_reg (v4i64 x) has no vector solution.
I also added a cost of this operations to the AVX costs table.
llvm-svn: 175619
It is possible that frame pointer is not found in the
callee saved info, thus FramePtrSpillFI may be incorrect
if we don't check the result of hasFP(MF).
Besides, if we enable the stack coloring algorithm, there
will be an assertion to ensure the slot is live. But in
the test case, %var1 is not live in the prologue of the
function, and we will get the assertion failure.
Note: There is similar code in ARMFrameLowering.cpp.
llvm-svn: 175616
and removing instructions. The implementation seems more complicated than it
needs to be, but I couldn't find something simpler that dealt with all of the
corner cases.
Also add a call to repairIndexesInRange() from repairIntervalsInRange().
llvm-svn: 175601
SltCCRxRy16, SltiCCRxImmX16, SltiuCCRxImmX16, SltuCCRxRy16
$T8 shows up as register $24 when emitted from C++ code so we had
to change some tests that were already there for this functionality.
llvm-svn: 175593
This generalizes Optional to require less from the T type by using aligned
storage for backing & placement new/deleting the T into it when necessary.
Also includes unit tests.
llvm-svn: 175580
MS-style inline assembly.
This is a follow-on to r175334. Forcing a FP to be emitted doesn't ensure it
will be used. Therefore, force the base pointer as well. We now treat MS
inline assembly in the same way we treat functions with dynamic stack
realignment and VLAs. This guarantees the BP will be used to reference
parameters and locals.
rdar://13218191
llvm-svn: 175576
excluding visibility bits.
Mips (o32 abi) specific e_header setting.
EF_MIPS_ABI_O32 needs to be set in the
ELF header flags for o32 abi output.
Contributer: Reed Kotler
llvm-svn: 175569
excluding visibility bits.
Mips (Mips16) specific e_header setting.
EF_MIPS_ARCH_ASE_M16 needs to be set in the
ELF header flags for Mips16.
Contributer: Reed Kotler
llvm-svn: 175566
excluding visibility bits.
Mips (MicroMips) specific STO handling .
The st_other field settig for STO_MIPS_MICROMIPS
Contributer: Zoran Jovanovic
llvm-svn: 175564
excluding visibility bits.
Generic STO handling at the Target level.
The st_other field of the ELF symbol table is one
byte in size. The first 2 bytes are used for generic
visibility and are currently handled by llvm.
The other six bits are processor specific and need
to be set at the target level.
A couple of notes:
The new static methods for accessing and setting the "other"
flags in include/llvm/MC/MCELF.h match the style guide
and not the other methods in the file. I don't like the
inconsistency, but feel I should follow the prescribed
lowerUpper() convention.
STO_ value definitions are not specified in gnu land as
consistently as the STT_ and STB_ fields. Probably because
the latter were defined in a standards doc and the former
defined partially in code. I have stuck with the full byte
definition of the flags.
Contributer: Zoran Jovanovic
llvm-svn: 175561
In my previous commit:
"Merge a f32 bitcast of a v2i32 extractelt
A vectorized sitfp on doubles will get scalarized to a sequence of an
extract_element of <2 x i32>, a bitcast to f32 and a sitofp.
Due to the the extract_element, and the bitcast we will uneccessarily generate
moves between scalar and vector registers."
I added a pattern containing a copy_to_regclass. The copy_to_regclass is
actually not needed.
radar://13191881
llvm-svn: 175555
