The behavior of {MIN,MAX}NAN differs from that of {MIN,MAX}NUM when only
one of the inputs is NaN: -NUM will return the non-NaN argument while
-NAN would return NaN.
It is desirable to lower to @llvm.{min,max}num to -NAN if they don't
have a native instruction for -NUM. Notably, ARMv7 NEON's vmin has the
-NAN semantics.
N.B. Of course, it is only safe to do this if the intrinsic call is
marked nnan.
llvm-svn: 266279
This code was creating a new type in the global context, regardless
of which context the user is sitting in, what can possibly go wrong?
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266275
At some point, ARM stopped getting any benefit from ConstantHoisting because
the pass called a different variant of getIntImmCost. Reimplementing the
correct variant revealed some problems, however:
+ ConstantHoisting was modifying switch statements. This is simply invalid,
the cases must remain integer constants no matter the notional cost.
+ ConstantHoisting was mangling alloca instructions in the entry block. These
should be handled by FrameLowering, so constants actually have a cost of 0.
Worse, the resulting bitcasts meant they became dynamic allocas.
rdar://25707382
llvm-svn: 266260
Fix a major bug from r265456. Although it's now much rarer, ValueMapper
sometimes has to duplicate cycles. The
might-transitively-reference-a-temporary counts don't decrement on their
own when there are cycles, and you need to call MDNode::resolveCycles to
fix it.
r265456 was checking the input nodes to see if they were unresolved.
This is useless; they should never be unresolved. Instead we should
check the output nodes and resolve cycles on them.
llvm-svn: 266258
Summary: LLVMAttribute has outlived its utility and is becoming a problem for C API users that what to use all the LLVM attributes. In order to help moving away from LLVMAttribute in a smooth manner, this diff introduce LLVMGetAttrKindIDInContext, which can be used instead of the enum values.
Reviewers: Wallbraker, whitequark, joker.eph, echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18749
llvm-svn: 266257
It is very likely that the swiftself parameter is alive throughout most
functions function so putting it into a callee save register should
avoid spills for the callers with only a minimum amount of extra spills
in the callees.
Currently the generated code is correct but unnecessarily spills and
reloads arguments passed in callee save registers, I will address this
in upcoming patches.
This also adds a missing check that for tail calls the preserved value
of the caller must be the same as the callees parameter.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18901
llvm-svn: 266253
It is very likely that the swiftself parameter is alive throughout most
functions function so putting it into a callee save register should
avoid spills for the callers with only a minimum amount of extra spills
in the callees.
Currently the generated code is correct but unnecessarily spills and
reloads arguments passed in callee save registers, I will address this
in upcoming patches.
This also adds a missing check that for tail calls the preserved value
of the caller must be the same as the callees parameter.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18902
llvm-svn: 266252
It is very likely that the swiftself parameter is alive throughout most
functions function so putting it into a callee save register should
avoid spills for the callers with only a minimum amount of extra spills
in the callees.
Currently the generated code is correct but unnecessarily spills and
reloads arguments passed in callee save registers, I will address this
in upcoming patches.
This also adds a missing check that for tail calls the preserved value
of the caller must be the same as the callees parameter.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19007
llvm-svn: 266251
And update the existing test cases in test/Object/macho-invalid.test
to use llvm-objdump with the -macho option to produce these
error messages and stop producing the generic "Invalid data
was encountered while parsing the file" message.
Working from the beginning of the file, if the mach header is too large for
the size of the file and then if the load commands that follow extend past
the end of the file these two errors now generate correct error messages.
Both of these have existing test cases in test/Object/macho-invalid.test .
But the first with macho-invalid-header it will never trigger the error message
"mach header extends past the end of the file" using any of the llvm tools as
they all use identify_magic() which rejects files with the correct magic number
that are too small in size. So I tested this by hacking that code and seeing the
error message down in parseHeader() really does happen. So in case there
is ever code in llvm that directly calls createMachOObjectFile() this error
message will be correctly produced.
The second error message of "load commands extends past the end of the file"
is triggered by a number of existing tests cases in test/Object/macho-invalid.test .
Also other tests trigger different error messages now like "ilocalsym plus
nlocalsym in LC_DYSYMTAB load command extends past the end of the
symbol table".
There are two existing test cases that still get the "Invalid data was encountered ..."
error messages that I will tackle next. But they will involve a bit of pluming an
Expect<...> up through the call stack and I want to do those as separate changes.
FYI, for those test cases that were trying to test specific errors that now get
different errors I’ll fix those in follow on changes and create new test cases
for those so they test the error they were meant to test.
llvm-svn: 266248
Summary:
When we are spilling SGPRs to scratch memory, we usually don't have
free SGPRs to do the address calculation, so we need to re-use the
ScratchOffset register for the calculation.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18917
llvm-svn: 266244
Since we can't emit diagnostics for missing "jmp 1f" labels until the end of
the file, we need to be able to restore the context used to calculate
file/line. This is basically the "# line file" directive that's being used at
the time the expression is seen.
rdar://25706972
llvm-svn: 266238
LLVM optimization passes may reduce a profiled target expression
to a constant. Removing runtime calls at such instrumentation points
would help speedup the runtime of the instrumented program.
llvm-svn: 266229
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17850
This patch implements the following instructions:
cmprb, cmpeqb, cnttzw, cnttzw., cnttzd, cnttzd.
llvm-svn: 266228
Disable LDP/STP for quads on Exynos M1 as they are not as efficient as pairs
of regular LDR/STR.
Patch by Abderrazek Zaafrani <a.zaafrani@samsung.com>.
llvm-svn: 266223
This patch fixes a bug (PR26827) when using anti-aliasing in store
merging. This sets the chain users of the component stores to point to
the new store instead of the component stores chain parent.
Reviewers: jyknight
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18909
llvm-svn: 266217
Summary:
To be able to work accurately on the reference graph when taking decision
about internalizing, promoting, renaming, etc. We need to have the alias
information explicit.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18836
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266214
Tests added along with implemented feature.
Note that there is a small leftover of unecessary MI sheduling issue
(more info in the review). CodeGen/AMDGPU/salu-to-valu.ll updated to fix
the false regression.
TODO: Support for TTMP quads, comma-separated syntax in "[]" and more.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17825
llvm-svn: 266205
Summary:
This is a special case for MIPS64 because the architecture requires
properly 32-bit sign-extended values in the register containers.
Additionaly, we merge consecutive trunc + AssertZExt nodes in order
to avoid unnecessary sign-extensions when the extension comes from a
type smaller than i32.
Reviewers: dsanders
Subscribers: dsanders, sdardis, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18893
llvm-svn: 266203
This patch fixes calculating of builtin_object_size if it depends on a
condition. Before this patch compiler did not know how to calculate the
object size when it finds a condition that cannot be eliminated.
This patch enables calculating of builtin_object_size even in case when
condition cannot be eliminated by choosing minimum or maximum value as a
result from condition. Choosing minimum or maximum value from condition
is based on the second argument of __builtin_object_size function.
Patch by Strahinja Petrovic.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18438
llvm-svn: 266193
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17137
This patch was reverted after the revertion of dependant patch http://reviews.llvm.org/D17068.
There was the problem with test-suite failure.
The problem is hopefully solved with dependant patch so this patch is commited again.
llvm-svn: 266179
Remove an ad-hoc transform in InstCombine and replace it with more
general machinery (ValueTracking, InstructionSimplify and VectorUtils).
This fixes PR27332.
llvm-svn: 266175
It is now only doing the update to the llvm.compiler_used global.
The client has to call separately the internalization stage.
Hopefully the code is simpler to understand this way.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266174
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17068
This changes contains fix for failing test-suite. So, this patch should hopefully work now.
llvm-svn: 266171
This will save a bunch of copies / initialization of intermediate
datastructure, and (hopefully) simplify the code.
This also abstract the symbol preservation mechanism outside of the
Internalization pass into the client code, which is not forced
to keep a map of strings for instance (ThinLTO will prefere hashes).
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266163
two fixes with one about error verify-regalloc reported, and
another about live range update of phi after rematerialization.
r265547:
Replace analyzeSiblingValues with new algorithm to fix its compile
time issue. The patch is to solve PR17409 and its duplicates.
analyzeSiblingValues is a N x N complexity algorithm where N is
the number of siblings generated by reg splitting. Although it
causes siginificant compile time issue when N is large, it is also
important for performance since it removes redundent spills and
enables rematerialization.
To solve the compile time issue, the patch removes analyzeSiblingValues
and replaces it with lower cost alternatives containing two parts. The
first part creates a new spill hoisting method in postOptimization of
register allocation. It does spill hoisting at once after all the spills
are generated instead of inside every instance of selectOrSplit. The
second part queries the define expr of the original register for
rematerializaiton and keep it always available during register allocation
even if it is already dead. It deletes those dead instructions only in
postOptimization. With the two parts in the patch, it can remove
analyzeSiblingValues without sacrificing performance.
Patches on top of r265547:
r265610 "Fix the compare-clang diff error introduced by r265547."
r265639 "Fix the sanitizer bootstrap error in r265547."
r265657 "InlineSpiller.cpp: Escap \@ in r265547. [-Wdocumentation]"
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15302
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18934
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18935
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18936
llvm-svn: 266162
Summary:
It seems like this was broken in r252327. I thought we had test cases
for this, but it's really hard to tirgger spills of this exact register
size since they aren't used very much.
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle
Subscribers: nhaehnle, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19021
llvm-svn: 266152
