expansion is the same as that used by LegalizeDAG.
The resulting code sucks in terms of performance/codesize on x86-32 for a
64-bit operation; I haven't looked into whether different expansions might be
better in general.
llvm-svn: 105378
otherwise the SmallVector it contains doesn't free its memory.
In most cases LiveIntervalAnalysis could get away by not calling the destructor,
because VNInfos are bumpptr-allocated, and smallvectors usually don't grow.
However when the SmallVector does grow it always leaks.
This is the valgrind shown leak from the original testcase:
==8206== 18,304 bytes in 151 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 164 of 164
==8206== at 0x4A079C7: operator new(unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:220)
==8206== by 0x4DB7A7E: llvm::SmallVectorBase::grow_pod(unsigned long, unsigned long) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/defaul
t/libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4F90382: llvm::VNInfo::addKill(llvm::SlotIndex) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.libs/libcl
amav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x5126B5C: llvm::LiveIntervals::handleVirtualRegisterDef(llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::M
achineInstr>, llvm::SlotIndex, llvm::MachineOperand&, unsigned int, llvm::LiveInterval&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/defau
lt/libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x512725E: llvm::LiveIntervals::handleRegisterDef(llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::MachineI
nstr>, llvm::SlotIndex, llvm::MachineOperand&, unsigned int) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.libs/libclamav
.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x51278A8: llvm::LiveIntervals::computeIntervals() (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.libs/libc
lamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x5127CB4: llvm::LiveIntervals::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/de
fault/libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4DAE935: llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclama
v/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4DAEB10: llvm::FunctionPassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Function&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclama
v/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4DAED3D: llvm::FunctionPassManager::run(llvm::Function&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.l
ibs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4D8BE8E: llvm::JIT::runJITOnFunctionUnlocked(llvm::Function*, llvm::MutexGuard const&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4D8CA72: llvm::JIT::getPointerToFunction(llvm::Function*) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
llvm-svn: 99400
to LLVM IR changes with addr label weirdness. In the testcase, we
generate references to the two bb's when codegen'ing the first
function:
_test1: ## @test1
leaq Ltmp0(%rip), %rax
..
leaq Ltmp1(%rip), %rax
Then continue to codegen the second function where the blocks
get merged. We're now smart enough to emit both labels, producing
this code:
_test_fun: ## @test_fun
## BB#0: ## %entry
Ltmp1: ## Block address taken
Ltmp0:
## BB#1: ## %ret
movl $-1, %eax
ret
Rejoice.
llvm-svn: 98595
label is generated, but then the block is deleted. Since the
value is undefined, we just emit the label right after the entry
label of the function. It might matter that the label is in the
same section as the function was afterall.
llvm-svn: 98579
the problem only shows for msp430 and pic16 which is why it specifies
them using -march. But it is wrong to put such tests in CodeGen/Generic,
since not everyone builds these targets. Put a copy of the test in each
of the target test directories.
llvm-svn: 90005
which was an expensive checks failure due to a bug in the checking. This
patch in essence reverts the original fix for PR3393, and refixes it by a
tweak to the way expensive checking is done.
llvm-svn: 89454
to break up CFG diamonds by banishing one of the blocks to the end of
the function, which is bad for code density and branch size.
This does pessimize MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/yacr2, the
benchmark cited as the reason for the change, however I've examined
the code and it looks more like a case of gaming a particular
branch than of being generally applicable.
llvm-svn: 84803
input filename so that opt doesn't print the input filename in the
output so that grep lines in the tests don't unintentionally match
strings in the input filename.
llvm-svn: 81537
all Darwin targets; could be split into separate tests for
the chip subdirectories, but from Chris' last mail on testing
I assume he'd rather have only one test. Generic seems to be
the best available, maybe there should be a Darwin subdirectory?
llvm-svn: 79877
integer and floating-point opcodes, introducing
FAdd, FSub, and FMul.
For now, the AsmParser, BitcodeReader, and IRBuilder all preserve
backwards compatability, and the Core LLVM APIs preserve backwards
compatibility for IR producers. Most front-ends won't need to change
immediately.
This implements the first step of the plan outlined here:
http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/IntegerOverflow.txt
llvm-svn: 72897
code in preparation for code generation. The main thing it does
is handle the case when eh.exception calls (and, in a future
patch, eh.selector calls) are far away from landing pads. Right
now in practice you only find eh.exception calls close to landing
pads: either in a landing pad (the common case) or in a landing
pad successor, due to loop passes shifting them about. However
future exception handling improvements will result in calls far
from landing pads:
(1) Inlining of rewinds. Consider the following case:
In function @f:
...
invoke @g to label %normal unwind label %unwinds
...
unwinds:
%ex = call i8* @llvm.eh.exception()
...
In function @g:
...
invoke @something to label %continue unwind label %handler
...
handler:
%ex = call i8* @llvm.eh.exception()
... perform cleanups ...
"rethrow exception"
Now inline @g into @f. Currently this is turned into:
In function @f:
...
invoke @something to label %continue unwind label %handler
...
handler:
%ex = call i8* @llvm.eh.exception()
... perform cleanups ...
invoke "rethrow exception" to label %normal unwind label %unwinds
unwinds:
%ex = call i8* @llvm.eh.exception()
...
However we would like to simplify invoke of "rethrow exception" into
a branch to the %unwinds label. Then %unwinds is no longer a landing
pad, and the eh.exception call there is then far away from any landing
pads.
(2) Using the unwind instruction for cleanups.
It would be nice to have codegen handle the following case:
invoke @something to label %continue unwind label %run_cleanups
...
handler:
... perform cleanups ...
unwind
This requires turning "unwind" into a library call, which
necessarily takes a pointer to the exception as an argument
(this patch also does this unwind lowering). But that means
you are using eh.exception again far from a landing pad.
(3) Bugpoint simplifications. When bugpoint is simplifying
exception handling code it often generates eh.exception calls
far from a landing pad, which then causes codegen to assert.
Bugpoint then latches on to this assertion and loses sight
of the original problem.
Note that it is currently rare for this pass to actually do
anything. And in fact it normally shouldn't do anything at
all given the code coming out of llvm-gcc! But it does fire
a few times in the testsuite. As far as I can see this is
almost always due to the LoopStrengthReduce codegen pass
introducing pointless loop preheader blocks which are landing
pads and only contain a branch to another block. This other
block contains an eh.exception call. So probably by tweaking
LoopStrengthReduce a bit this can be avoided.
llvm-svn: 72276
When a test fails with more than a pipeful of output on stdout AND stderr, one
of the DejaGnu programs blocks. The problem can be avoided by redirecting
stdout to a file.
llvm-svn: 71919
anything larger than 64-bits, avoiding a crash. This should
really be fixed to use APInts, though type legalization happens
to help us out and we get good code on the attached testcase at
least.
This fixes rdar://6836460
llvm-svn: 70360
Massive check in. This changes the "-fast" flag to "-O#" in llc. If you want to
use the old behavior, the flag is -O0. This change allows for finer-grained
control over which optimizations are run at different -O levels.
Most of this work was pretty mechanical. The majority of the fixes came from
verifying that a "fast" variable wasn't used anymore. The JIT still uses a
"Fast" flag. I'll change the JIT with a follow-up patch.
llvm-svn: 70343
