In PGO, a C++ external linkage function `foo` has a private counter
`__profc_foo` and a private `__profd_foo` in a `comdat nodeduplicate`.
A `__attribute__((weak))` function `foo` has a weak hidden counter `__profc_foo`
and a private `__profd_foo` in a `comdat nodeduplicate`.
In `ld.lld a.o b.o`, say a.o defines an external linkage `foo` and b.o
defines a weak `foo`. Currently we treat `comdat nodeduplicate` as `comdat any`,
ld.lld will incorrectly consider `b.o:__profc_foo` non-prevailing. In the worst
case when `b.o:__profd_foo` is retained and `b.o:__profc_foo` isn't, there will
be dangling reference causing an `undefined hidden symbol` error.
Add SelectionKind to `Comdat` in IRSymtab and let linkers ignore nodeduplicate comdat.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106228
Using $ breaks demangling of the symbols. For example,
$ c++filt _Z3foov\$123
_Z3foov$123
This causes problems for developers who would like to see nice stack traces
etc., but also for automatic crash tracking systems which try to organize
crashes based on the stack traces.
Instead, use the period as suffix separator, since Itanium demanglers normally
ignore such suffixes:
$ c++filt _Z3foov.123
foo() [clone .123]
This is already done in some places; try to do it everywhere.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97484
lto::Config has a field to control whether the build is "freestanding"
(no builtins) or not, but it is not hooked up to the code actually
running the passes.
This patch adds support for the flag to both the code that runs
optimization with the new and old pass managers, by explicitly adding a
TargetLibraryInfo instance. If Freestanding is true, all library functions
are disabled.
Reviewed By: steven_wu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94630
This is the #1 of 2 changes that make remarks hotness threshold option
available in more tools. The changes also allow the threshold to sync with
hotness threshold from profile summary with special value 'auto'.
This change modifies the interface of lto::setupLLVMOptimizationRemarks() to
accept remarks hotness threshold. Update all the tools that use it with remarks
hotness threshold options:
* lld: '--opt-remarks-hotness-threshold='
* llvm-lto2: '--pass-remarks-hotness-threshold='
* llvm-lto: '--lto-pass-remarks-hotness-threshold='
* gold plugin: '-plugin-opt=opt-remarks-hotness-threshold='
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85809
No longer rely on an external tool to build the llvm component layout.
Instead, leverage the existing `add_llvm_componentlibrary` cmake function and
introduce `add_llvm_component_group` to accurately describe component behavior.
These function store extra properties in the created targets. These properties
are processed once all components are defined to resolve library dependencies
and produce the header expected by llvm-config.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90848
Summary:
This patch does the following:
1. Make InitTargetOptionsFromCodeGenFlags() accepts Triple as a
parameter, because some options' default value is triple dependant.
2. DataSections is turned on by default on AIX for llc.
3. Test cases change accordingly because of the default behaviour change.
4. Clang Driver passes in -fdata-sections by default on AIX.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, DiggerLin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88737
This should make both static and dynamic NewPM plugins work with LTO.
And as a bonus, it makes static linking of OldPM plugins more reliable
for plugins with both an OldPM and NewPM interface.
I only implemented the command-line flag to specify NewPM plugins in
llvm-lto2, to show it works. Support can be added for other tools later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76866
Before this patch, it wasn't possible to extend the ThinLTO threads to all SMT/CMT threads in the system. Only one thread per core was allowed, instructed by usage of llvm::heavyweight_hardware_concurrency() in the ThinLTO code. Any number passed to the LLD flag /opt:lldltojobs=..., or any other ThinLTO-specific flag, was previously interpreted in the context of llvm::heavyweight_hardware_concurrency(), which means SMT disabled.
One can now say in LLD:
/opt:lldltojobs=0 -- Use one std::thread / hardware core in the system (no SMT). Default value if flag not specified.
/opt:lldltojobs=N -- Limit usage to N threads, regardless of usage of heavyweight_hardware_concurrency().
/opt:lldltojobs=all -- Use all hardware threads in the system. Equivalent to /opt:lldltojobs=$(nproc) on Linux and /opt:lldltojobs=%NUMBER_OF_PROCESSORS% on Windows. When an affinity mask is set for the process, threads will be created only for the cores selected by the mask.
When N > number-of-hardware-threads-in-the-system, the threads in the thread pool will be dispatched equally on all CPU sockets (tested only on Windows).
When N <= number-of-hardware-threads-on-a-CPU-socket, the threads will remain on the CPU socket where the process started (only on Windows).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75153
MCTargetOptionsCommandFlags.inc and CommandFlags.inc are headers which contain
cl::opt with static storage.
These headers are meant to be incuded by tools to make it easier to parametrize
codegen/mc.
However, these headers are also included in at least two libraries: lldCommon
and handle-llvm. As a result, when creating DYLIB, clang-cpp holds a reference
to the options, and lldCommon holds another reference. Linking the two in a
single executable, as zig does[0], results in a double registration.
This patch explores an other approach: the .inc files are moved to regular
files, and the registration happens on-demand through static declaration of
options in the constructor of a static object.
[0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756977#c5
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75579
The goal of this patch is to maximize CPU utilization on multi-socket or high core count systems, so that parallel computations such as LLD/ThinLTO can use all hardware threads in the system. Before this patch, on Windows, a maximum of 64 hardware threads could be used at most, in some cases dispatched only on one CPU socket.
== Background ==
Windows doesn't have a flat cpu_set_t like Linux. Instead, it projects hardware CPUs (or NUMA nodes) to applications through a concept of "processor groups". A "processor" is the smallest unit of execution on a CPU, that is, an hyper-thread if SMT is active; a core otherwise. There's a limit of 32-bit processors on older 32-bit versions of Windows, which later was raised to 64-processors with 64-bit versions of Windows. This limit comes from the affinity mask, which historically is represented by the sizeof(void*). Consequently, the concept of "processor groups" was introduced for dealing with systems with more than 64 hyper-threads.
By default, the Windows OS assigns only one "processor group" to each starting application, in a round-robin manner. If the application wants to use more processors, it needs to programmatically enable it, by assigning threads to other "processor groups". This also means that affinity cannot cross "processor group" boundaries; one can only specify a "preferred" group on start-up, but the application is free to allocate more groups if it wants to.
This creates a peculiar situation, where newer CPUs like the AMD EPYC 7702P (64-cores, 128-hyperthreads) are projected by the OS as two (2) "processor groups". This means that by default, an application can only use half of the cores. This situation could only get worse in the years to come, as dies with more cores will appear on the market.
== The problem ==
The heavyweight_hardware_concurrency() API was introduced so that only *one hardware thread per core* was used. Once that API returns, that original intention is lost, only the number of threads is retained. Consider a situation, on Windows, where the system has 2 CPU sockets, 18 cores each, each core having 2 hyper-threads, for a total of 72 hyper-threads. Both heavyweight_hardware_concurrency() and hardware_concurrency() currently return 36, because on Windows they are simply wrappers over std:🧵:hardware_concurrency() -- which can only return processors from the current "processor group".
== The changes in this patch ==
To solve this situation, we capture (and retain) the initial intention until the point of usage, through a new ThreadPoolStrategy class. The number of threads to use is deferred as late as possible, until the moment where the std::threads are created (ThreadPool in the case of ThinLTO).
When using hardware_concurrency(), setting ThreadCount to 0 now means to use all the possible hardware CPU (SMT) threads. Providing a ThreadCount above to the maximum number of threads will have no effect, the maximum will be used instead.
The heavyweight_hardware_concurrency() is similar to hardware_concurrency(), except that only one thread per hardware *core* will be used.
When LLVM_ENABLE_THREADS is OFF, the threading APIs will always return 1, to ensure any caller loops will be exercised at least once.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71775
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
down to pass builder in ltobackend.
Currently CodeGenOpts like UnrollLoops/VectorizeLoop/VectorizeSLP in clang
are not passed down to pass builder in ltobackend when new pass manager is
used. This is inconsistent with the behavior when new pass manager is used
and thinlto is not used. Such inconsistency causes slp vectorization pass
not being enabled in ltobackend for O3 + thinlto right now. This patch
fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72386
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
This patch adds support to the WholeProgramDevirt pass to perform
index-based WPD, which is invoked from ThinLTO during the thin link.
The ThinLTO backend (WPD import phase) behaves the same regardless of
whether the WPD decisions were made with the index-based or (the
existing) IR-based analysis.
Depends on D54815.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, dang, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55153
llvm-svn: 367679
Use -fsave-optimization-record=<format> to specify a different format
than the default, which is YAML.
For now, only YAML is supported.
llvm-svn: 363573
* Add a common function to setup opt-remarks
* Rename common options to the same names
* Add error types to distinguish between file errors and regex errors
llvm-svn: 363415
* Add a common function to setup opt-remarks
* Rename common options to the same names
* Add error types to distinguish between file errors and regex errors
llvm-svn: 363328
Summary:
For the most part this consists of replacing ${LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD} with
some combination of AllTargets* so that they depend on specific components
of a target backend rather than all of it. The overall effect of this is
that, for example, tools like opt no longer falsely depend on the
disassembler, while tools like llvm-ar no longer depend on the code
generator.
There's a couple quirks to point out here:
* AllTargetsCodeGens is a bit more prevalent than expected. Tools like dsymutil
seem to need it which I was surprised by.
* llvm-xray linked to all the backends but doesn't seem to need any of them.
It builds and passes the tests so that seems to be correct.
* I left gold out as it's not built when binutils is not available so I'm
unable to test it
Reviewers: bogner, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: bogner
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mgorny, steven_wu, dexonsmith, rupprecht, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62331
llvm-svn: 361567
This patch implements a limited form of autolinking primarily designed to allow
either the --dependent-library compiler option, or "comment lib" pragmas (
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/preprocessor/comment-c-cpp?view=vs-2017) in
C/C++ e.g. #pragma comment(lib, "foo"), to cause an ELF linker to automatically
add the specified library to the link when processing the input file generated
by the compiler.
Currently this extension is unique to LLVM and LLD. However, care has been taken
to design this feature so that it could be supported by other ELF linkers.
The design goals were to provide:
- A simple linking model for developers to reason about.
- The ability to to override autolinking from the linker command line.
- Source code compatibility, where possible, with "comment lib" pragmas in other
environments (MSVC in particular).
Dependent library support is implemented differently for ELF platforms than on
the other platforms. Primarily this difference is that on ELF we pass the
dependent library specifiers directly to the linker without manipulating them.
This is in contrast to other platforms where they are mapped to a specific
linker option by the compiler. This difference is a result of the greater
variety of ELF linkers and the fact that ELF linkers tend to handle libraries in
a more complicated fashion than on other platforms. This forces us to defer
handling the specifiers to the linker.
In order to achieve a level of source code compatibility with other platforms
we have restricted this feature to work with libraries that meet the following
"reasonable" requirements:
1. There are no competing defined symbols in a given set of libraries, or
if they exist, the program owner doesn't care which is linked to their
program.
2. There may be circular dependencies between libraries.
The binary representation is a mergeable string section (SHF_MERGE,
SHF_STRINGS), called .deplibs, with custom type SHT_LLVM_DEPENDENT_LIBRARIES
(0x6fff4c04). The compiler forms this section by concatenating the arguments of
the "comment lib" pragmas and --dependent-library options in the order they are
encountered. Partial (-r, -Ur) links are handled by concatenating .deplibs
sections with the normal mergeable string section rules. As an example, #pragma
comment(lib, "foo") would result in:
.section ".deplibs","MS",@llvm_dependent_libraries,1
.asciz "foo"
For LTO, equivalent information to the contents of a the .deplibs section can be
retrieved by the LLD for bitcode input files.
LLD processes the dependent library specifiers in the following way:
1. Dependent libraries which are found from the specifiers in .deplibs sections
of relocatable object files are added when the linker decides to include that
file (which could itself be in a library) in the link. Dependent libraries
behave as if they were appended to the command line after all other options. As
a consequence the set of dependent libraries are searched last to resolve
symbols.
2. It is an error if a file cannot be found for a given specifier.
3. Any command line options in effect at the end of the command line parsing apply
to the dependent libraries, e.g. --whole-archive.
4. The linker tries to add a library or relocatable object file from each of the
strings in a .deplibs section by; first, handling the string as if it was
specified on the command line; second, by looking for the string in each of the
library search paths in turn; third, by looking for a lib<string>.a or
lib<string>.so (depending on the current mode of the linker) in each of the
library search paths.
5. A new command line option --no-dependent-libraries tells LLD to ignore the
dependent libraries.
Rationale for the above points:
1. Adding the dependent libraries last makes the process simple to understand
from a developers perspective. All linkers are able to implement this scheme.
2. Error-ing for libraries that are not found seems like better behavior than
failing the link during symbol resolution.
3. It seems useful for the user to be able to apply command line options which
will affect all of the dependent libraries. There is a potential problem of
surprise for developers, who might not realize that these options would apply
to these "invisible" input files; however, despite the potential for surprise,
this is easy for developers to reason about and gives developers the control
that they may require.
4. This algorithm takes into account all of the different ways that ELF linkers
find input files. The different search methods are tried by the linker in most
obvious to least obvious order.
5. I considered adding finer grained control over which dependent libraries were
ignored (e.g. MSVC has /nodefaultlib:<library>); however, I concluded that this
is not necessary: if finer control is required developers can fall back to using
the command line directly.
RFC thread: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-March/131004.html.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60274
llvm-svn: 360984
Currently we have -Rpass for filtering the remarks that are displayed as
diagnostics, but when using -fsave-optimization-record, there is no way
to filter the remarks while generating them.
This adds support for filtering remarks by passes using a regex.
Ex: `clang -fsave-optimization-record -foptimization-record-passes=inline`
will only emit the remarks coming from the pass `inline`.
This adds:
* `-fsave-optimization-record` to the driver
* `-opt-record-passes` to cc1
* `-lto-pass-remarks-filter` to the LTOCodeGenerator
* `--opt-remarks-passes` to lld
* `-pass-remarks-filter` to llc, opt, llvm-lto, llvm-lto2
* `-opt-remarks-passes` to gold-plugin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59268
Original llvm-svn: 355964
llvm-svn: 355984
Currently we have -Rpass for filtering the remarks that are displayed as
diagnostics, but when using -fsave-optimization-record, there is no way
to filter the remarks while generating them.
This adds support for filtering remarks by passes using a regex.
Ex: `clang -fsave-optimization-record -foptimization-record-passes=inline`
will only emit the remarks coming from the pass `inline`.
This adds:
* `-fsave-optimization-record` to the driver
* `-opt-record-passes` to cc1
* `-lto-pass-remarks-filter` to the LTOCodeGenerator
* `--opt-remarks-passes` to lld
* `-pass-remarks-filter` to llc, opt, llvm-lto, llvm-lto2
* `-opt-remarks-passes` to gold-plugin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59268
llvm-svn: 355964
Current PGO profile counts are not context sensitive. The branch probabilities
for the inlined functions are kept the same for all call-sites, and they might
be very different from the actual branch probabilities. These suboptimal
profiles can greatly affect some downstream optimizations, in particular for
the machine basic block placement optimization.
In this patch, we propose to have a post-inline PGO instrumentation/use pass,
which we called Context Sensitive PGO (CSPGO). For the users who want the best
possible performance, they can perform a second round of PGO instrument/use on
the top of the regular PGO. They will have two sets of profile counts. The
first pass profile will be manly for inline, indirect-call promotion, and
CGSCC simplification pass optimizations. The second pass profile is for
post-inline optimizations and code-gen optimizations.
A typical usage:
// Regular PGO instrumentation and generate pass1 profile.
> clang -O2 -fprofile-generate source.c -o gen
> ./gen
> llvm-profdata merge default.*profraw -o pass1.profdata
// CSPGO instrumentation.
> clang -O2 -fprofile-use=pass1.profdata -fcs-profile-generate -o gen2
> ./gen2
// Merge two sets of profiles
> llvm-profdata merge default.*profraw pass1.profdata -o profile.profdata
// Use the combined profile. Pass manager will invoke two PGO use passes.
> clang -O2 -fprofile-use=profile.profdata -o use
This change touches many components in the compiler. The reviewed patch
(D54175) will committed in phrases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54175
llvm-svn: 354930
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
D45602 added this to most tools, including llvm-lto, but not to
llvm-lto2. Add it there and test that it works in both lto tools.
Reviewers: ruiu
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53330
llvm-svn: 344631
Summary:
Set setDiagnosticsHotnessRequested before the early exit check for a
diagnostic output file, so that pass remarks with hotness works when
emitting pass remarks to stderr (e.g. via -pass-remarks=.).
Also fix the llvm-lto2 diagnistic handler so that it only calls exit(1)
when the diagnistic is an error type. Otherwise the new test invocation
of llvm-lto2 with -pass-remarks causes it to fail. The new code is
consistent with the diagnostic handler elsewhere (e.g. on the
LLVMContext).
Reviewers: pcc, davide
Subscribers: fhahn, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, inglorion
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46387
llvm-svn: 331569
This patch adds a StatsFile option to LTO/Config.h and updates both
LLVMGold and llvm-lto2 to set it.
Reviewers: MatzeB, tejohnson, espindola
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45531
llvm-svn: 330411
These aren't the .def style files used in LLVM that require a macro
defined before their inclusion - they're just basic non-modular includes
to stamp out command line flag variables.
llvm-svn: 329840
Summary:
ThinLTO indexing may decide to skip all objects. If we don't write something to
the list build system may consider this as failure or linker can reuse a file
from the previews build.
Reviewers: pcc, tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43415
llvm-svn: 325819
Summary:
With D43396, no clients use the Path parameter anymore.
Depends on D43396.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43400
llvm-svn: 325619
Summary: ThinLTO may skip object for other reasons, e.g. if there is no summary.
Reviewers: pcc, eugenis
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42514
llvm-svn: 323818
Since this isn't a real header - it includes static functions and had
external linkage variables (though this change makes them static, since
that's what they should be) so can't be included more than once in a
program.
llvm-svn: 319082
IMHO it is an antipattern to have a enum value that is Default.
At any given piece of code it is not clear if we have to handle
Default or if has already been mapped to a concrete value. In this
case in particular, only the target can do the mapping and it is nice
to make sure it is always done.
This deletes the two default enum values of CodeModel and uses an
explicit Optional<CodeModel> when it is possible that it is
unspecified.
llvm-svn: 309911
Summary:
This exposes LTO's Conf.SampleProfile as a command line option
(-lto-sample-profile-file) for testing via the llvm-lto2 utility.
Reviewers: pcc, danielcdh
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36030
llvm-svn: 309456
Summary:
ELF linkers generate __start_<secname> and __stop_<secname> symbols
when there is a value in a section <secname> where the name is a valid
C identifier. If dead stripping determines that the values declared
in section <secname> are dead, and we then internalize (and delete)
such a symbol, programs that reference the corresponding start and end
section symbols will get undefined reference linking errors.
To fix this, add the section name to the IRSymtab entry when a symbol is
defined in a specific section. Then use this in the gold-plugin to mark
the symbol as external and visible from outside the summary when the
section name is a valid C identifier.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35639
llvm-svn: 309009
error message
CMakeFiles/llvm-lto2.dir/llvm-lto2.cpp.o: In function `dumpSymtab(int, char**)':
llvm-lto2.cpp:(.text._ZL10dumpSymtabiPPc+0x238): undefined reference to `llvm::getBitcodeFileContents(llvm::MemoryBufferRef)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
llvm-svn: 306507
procedural optimizations to prevent dropping symbols and allow the linker
to process re-directs.
PR33145: --wrap doesn't work with lto.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33621
llvm-svn: 304719
Summary:
As we teach Clang to use ThinkLTO + new PM, it's good for the users to
inject through Config, instead of setting a flag in the LTOBackend
library. Move the flag to llvm-lto2.
As it moves to llvm-lto2, a new name -use-new-pm seems simpler and as
clear.
Reviewers: davide, tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, inglorion, eraman, chandlerc, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33799
llvm-svn: 304492
Start using it in LLD to avoid needing to read bitcode again just to get the
target triple, and in llvm-lto2 to avoid printing symbol table information
that is inappropriate for the target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32038
llvm-svn: 300300
Summary:
The linker needs to be able to determine whether a symbol is text or data to
handle the case of a common being overridden by a strong definition in an
archive. If the archive contains a text member of the same name as the common,
that function is discarded. However, if the archive contains a data member of
the same name, that strong definition overrides the common. This is a behavior
of ld.bfd, which the Qualcomm linker also supports in LTO.
Here's a test case to illustrate:
####
cat > 1.c << \!
int blah;
!
cat > 2.c << \!
int blah() {
return 0;
}
!
cat > 3.c << \!
int blah = 20;
!
clang -c 1.c
clang -c 2.c
clang -c 3.c
ar cr lib.a 2.o 3.o
ld 1.o lib.a -t
####
The correct output is:
1.o
(lib.a)3.o
Thanks to Shankar Easwaran and Hemant Kulkarni for the test case!
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, rafael, pcc, davide
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: davide, llvm-commits, inglorion
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31901
llvm-svn: 300205
