Update the list of s_sendmsg messages known to the assembler and
disassembler and validate the ones that were added or removed in gfx9
and gfx10.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97295
Followup to D72573 - as detailed in https://blog.regehr.org/archives/1709 we don't make use of the known leading/trailing zeros for shifted values in cases where we don't know the shift amount value.
Stop ValueTracking returning zero for poison shift patterns and use the KnownBits shift helpers directly.
Extend KnownBits::shl to combine all possible shifted combinations if both min/max shift amount values are in range.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90479
Putting globals in a comdat for dead-stripping changes the semantic and
can potentially cause false negative odr violations at link time.
If odr indicators are used, we keep the comdat sections, as link time
odr violations will be dectected for the odr indicator symbols.
This fixes PR 47925
This reverts the revert commit 437f0bbcd509d0ed71b91ec1f86f48c2f4aae980.
It adds a new toVPRecipeResult, which forces VPRecipeOrVPValueTy to be
constructed with a VPRecipeBase *. This should address ambiguous
constructor issues for recipe sub-types that also inherit from VPValue.
The new assertions check that Addressables removed when removing
external or absolute symbols are not referenced by another symbol.
A comment on post-fixup passes is updated: vmaddrs have all been
set up by the time the pre-fixup passes are run, post-fixup passes
run after fixups have been applied to content.
(CMTST A, A) will only set elements to 0 if the element is 0 in A. Use
it for != 0 compares, which currently use (vnot (CMEQz A)). This saves a
mvn instruction.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97303
Currently the load/store optimizer will only fold in increments of the
same size as the load/store. This patch expands that to any legal
immediate for the post-inc instruction.
This is a recommit of 3b34b06fc5908b with correctness fixes and extra
tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95885
This reverts commit 6b286d93f7ec8518c685a302269e44b06a0a24f3 because
in some cases when the optimizer evaluates the global initializer,
__llvm_prf_cnts may not be entirely zero initialized.
We know the input is going to be expanded as well, so we should
just ask for the already expanded operands. Otherwise we create
nodes that are just going to need to be legalized.
-O1 and above do dont call real optimizer pipeline in ThinLTO PreLink.
Also clang can't add PostLink OptimizerLastEPCallbacks for in-process ThinLTO.
This results in missing sanitizer passes with ThinLTO.
Simple working solution is just call OptimizerLastEPCallbacks
at the end of buildThinLTOPreLinkDefaultPipeline.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96320
The current size of the llvm-project repository exceeds 1 GB. A shallow clone can save a lot of space and time. Some developers might not aware of this feature.
Reviewed By: awarzynski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97118
Previously there was no way to control how module destructors were emitted
by `ModuleAddressSanitizerPass`. However, we want language frontends (e.g. Clang)
to be able to decide how to emit these destructors (if at all).
This patch introduces the `AsanDtorKind` enum that represents the different ways
destructors can be emitted. There are currently only two valid ways to emit destructors.
* `Global` - Use `llvm.global_dtors`. This was the previous behavior and is the default.
* `None` - Do not emit module destructors.
The `ModuleAddressSanitizerPass` and the various wrappers around it have been updated
to take the `AsanDtorKind` as an argument.
The `-asan-destructor-kind=` command line argument has been introduced to make this
easy to test from `opt`. If this argument is specified it overrides the value passed
to the `ModuleAddressSanitizerPass` constructor.
Note that `AsanDtorKind` is not `bool` because we will introduce a new way to
emit destructors in a subsequent patch.
Note that `AsanDtorKind` is given its own header file because if it is declared
in `Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.h` it leads to compile error
(Module is ambiguous) when trying to use it in
`clang/Basic/CodeGenOptions.def`.
rdar://71609176
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96571
Currently managed variables are emitted as undefined symbols, which
causes difficulty for diagnosing undefined symbols for non-managed
variables.
This patch transforms managed variables in device compilation so that
they can be emitted as normal variables.
Reviewed by: Artem Belevich
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96195
The non-flag setting variants of instructions may have different regclass
requirements. If so, we need to constrain them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97343
This is for XCOFF DWARF support.
Seems when DWARF debug is enable, symbol 0 has special usage
for AIX binder. At least, symbol 0 can not be the .text
section. Otherwise, we get some binding time error.
Add correct C_FILE symbol at index 0 here to make AIX binder
work.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97117
We may need to do some customization for DWARF unit length in DWARF
section headers for some targets for some code generation path.
For example, for XCOFF in assembly path, AIX assembler does not require
the debug section containing its debug unit length in the header.
Move emitDwarfUnitLength to MCStreamer class so that we can do
customization in different Streamers
Reviewed By: ikudrin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95932
The maintainer of libdwarf kindly provided this patch with a bunch of
historic DWARF extensions that are missing from Dwarf.def. This list
is helpful to avoid potential conflicts in the user-defined vendor
extension space in the future.
Patch by David Anderson!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97242
Blocks that contain only a single branch instruction to the next block can be skipped in analyzing the loop-nest structure.
This is currently done by `getSingleSuccessor()`.
However, the branch instruction might have multiple targets which happen to all be the same.
In this case, the block should still be considered as empty and skipped.
An example is `test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/update-condbranch-duplicate-successors.ll` (the LIT test for this patch is modified from it as well).
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97286
This is a simple patch to update SimplifyCFG's passingValueIsAlwaysUndefined to inspect more attributes.
A new function `CallBase::isPassingUndefUB` checks attributes that imply noundef.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97244
This got me pretty recently... TrailingObjects cannot be copied or
moved, since they need to be pre-allocated. This patch deletes the copy
and move operations (plus re-adds the default ctor).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97324
The order in which the nested calls to Builder.buildWhatever are
evaluated in differs between GCC and Clang.
This caused a bot failure because the MIR in the testcase was
coming out in a different order than expected.
Rather than using nested calls, pull them out in order to fix the
order of evaluation.
And delete the SmallPtrSetImpl overload.
While here, decrease inline element counts from 8 to 4. See D97128 for the choice.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97257
While here, decrease inline element counts from 8 to 4. See D97128 for the choice.
Depends on D97128 (which added a new SmallVecImpl overload for collectUsedGlobalVariables).
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97139
Iterating on `SmallPtrSet<GlobalValue *, 8>` with more than 8 elements
is not deterministic. Use a SmallVector instead because `Used` is guaranteed to contain unique elements.
While here, decrease inline element counts from 8 to 4. The number of
`llvm.used`/`llvm.compiler.used` elements is usually 0 or 1. For full
LTO/hybrid LTO, the number may be large, so we need to be careful.
According to tejohnson's analysis https://reviews.llvm.org/D97128#2582399 , 4 is
good for a large project with WholeProgramDevirt, when available_externally
vtables are placed in the llvm.compiler.used set.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97128
The fix in 3c4c205060c9398da705eb71b63ddd8a04999de9 caused an assert in
the case of a pure virtual base class. In that case, the vTableFuncs
list on the summary will be empty, so we were hitting the new assert
that the linkage type was not available_externally.
In the case of pure virtual, we do not want to assert, and additionally
need to set VS so that we don't treat it conservatively and quit the
analysis of the type id early.
This exposed a pre-existing issue where we were not updating the vcall
visibility on pure virtual functions when whole program visibility was
specified. We were skipping updating the visibility on any global vars
that didn't have any vTableFuncs, which meant all pure virtual were not
updated, and the later analysis would block any devirtualization of
calls that had a type id used on those pure virtual vtables (see the
handling in the other code modified in this patch). Simply remove that
check. It will mean that we may update the vcall visibility on global
vars that aren't vtables, but that setting is ignored for any global
vars that didn't have type metadata anyway.
Added a new test case that asserted without removing the assert, and
that requires the other fixes in this patch (updateVCallVisibilityInIndex
and not skipping all vtables without virtual funcs) to get a successful
devirtualization with index-only WPD. I added cases to test hybrid and
regular LTO for completeness, although those already worked without the
fixes here.
With this final fix, a clang multistage bootstrap with WPD builds and
runs all tests successfully.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97126
This CL is not big but contains changes that span multiple analyses and
passes. This description is very long because it tries to explain basics
on what each pass/analysis does and why we need this change on top of
that. Please feel free to skip parts that are not necessary for your
understanding.
---
`WasmEHFuncInfo` contains the mapping of <EH pad, the EH pad's next
unwind destination>. The value (unwind dest) here is where an exception
should end up when it is not caught by the key (EH pad). We record this
info in WasmEHPrepare to fix catch mismatches, because the CFG itself
does not have this info. A CFG only contains BBs and
predecessor-successor relationship between them, but in `WasmEHFuncInfo`
the unwind destination BB is not necessarily a successor or the key EH
pad BB. Their relationship can be intuitively explained by this C++ code
snippet:
```
try {
try {
foo();
} catch (int) { // EH pad
...
}
} catch (...) { // unwind destination
}
```
So when `foo()` throws, it goes to `catch (int)` first. But if it is not
caught by it, it ends up in the next unwind destination `catch (...)`.
This unwind destination is what you see in `catchswitch`'s
`unwind label %bb` part.
---
`WebAssemblyExceptionInfo` groups exceptions so that they can be sorted
continuously together in CFGSort, as we do for loops. What this analysis
does is very simple: it creates a single `WebAssemblyException` per EH
pad, and all BBs that are dominated by that EH pad are included in this
exception. We also identify subexception relationship in this way: if
EHPad A domiantes EHPad B, EHPad B's exception is a subexception of
EHPad A's exception.
This simple rule turns out to be incorrect in some cases. In
`WasmEHFuncInfo`, if EHPad A's unwind destination is EHPad B, it means
semantically EHPad B should not be included in EHPad A's exception,
because it does not make sense to rethrow/delegate to an inner scope.
This is what happened in CFGStackify as a result of this:
```
try
try
catch
... <- %dest_bb is among here!
end
delegate %dest_bb
```
So this patch adds a phase in `WebAssemblyExceptionInfo::recalculate` to
make sure excptions' unwind destinations are not subexceptions of
their unwind sources in `WasmEHFuncInfo`.
But this alone does not prevent `dest_bb` in the example above from
being sorted within the inner `catch`'s exception, even if its exception
is not a subexception of that `catch`'s exception anymore, because of
how CFGSort works, which will be explained below.
---
CFGSort places BBs within the same `SortRegion` (loop or exception)
continuously together so they can be demarcated with `loop`-`end_loop`
or `catch`-`end_try` in CFGStackify.
`SortRegion` is a wrapper for one of `MachineLoop` or
`WebAssemblyException`. `SortRegionInfo` already does some complicated
things because there discrepancies between those two data structures.
`WebAssemblyException` is what we control, and it is defined as an EH
pad as its header and BBs dominated by the header as its BBs (with a
newly added exception of unwind destinations explained in the previous
paragraph). But `MachineLoop` is an LLVM data structure and uses the
standard loop detection algorithm. So by the algorithm, BBs that are 1.
dominated by the loop header and 2. have a path back to its header.
Because of the second condition, many BBs that are dominated by the loop
header are not included in the loop. So BBs that contain `return` or
branches to outside of the loop are not technically included in
`MachineLoop`, but they can be sorted together with the loop with no
problem.
Maybe to relax the condition, in CFGSort, when we are in a `SortRegion`
we allow sorting of not only BBs that belong to the current innermost
region but also BBs that are by the current region header.
(This was written this way from the first version written by Dan, when
only loops existed.) But now, we have cases in exceptions when EHPad B
is the unwind destination for EHPad A, even if EHPad B is dominated by
EHPad A it should not be included in EHPad A's exception, and should not
be sorted within EHPad A.
One way to make things work, at least correctly, is change `dominates`
condition to `contains` condition for `SortRegion` when sorting BBs, but
this will change compilation results for existing non-EH code and I
can't be sure it will not degrade performance or code size. I think it
will degrade performance because it will force many BBs dominated by a
loop, which don't have the path back to the header, to be placed after
the loop and it will likely to create more branches and blocks.
So this does a little hacky check when adding BBs to `Preferred` list:
(`Preferred` list is a ready list. CFGSort maintains ready list in two
priority queues: `Preferred` and `Ready`. I'm not very sure why, but it
was written that way from the beginning. BBs are first added to
`Preferred` list and then some of them are pushed to `Ready` list, so
here we only need to guard condition for `Preferred` list.)
When adding a BB to `Preferred` list, we check if that BB is an unwind
destination of another BB. To do this, this adds the reverse mapping,
`UnwindDestToSrc`, and getter methods to `WasmEHFuncInfo`. And if the BB
is an unwind destination, it checks if the current stack of regions
(`Entries`) contains its source BB by traversing the stack backwards. If
we find its unwind source in there, we add the BB to its `Deferred`
list, to make sure that unwind destination BB is added to `Preferred`
list only after that region with the unwind source BB is sorted and
popped from the stack.
---
This does not contain a new test that crashes because of this bug, but
this fix changes the result for one of existing test case. This test
case didn't crash because it fortunately didn't contain `delegate` to
the incorrectly placed unwind destination BB.
Fixes https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13514.
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97247
In every catchpad except `catch (...)`, we add a call to
`_Unwind_CallPersonality`, which is a wapper to call the personality
function. (In most of other Itanium-based architectures the call is done
from libunwind, but in wasm we don't have the control over the VM.)
Because the personatlity function is called to figure out whether the
current exception is a type we should catch, such as `int` or
`SomeClass&`, `catch (...)` does not need the personality function call.
For the same reason, all cleanuppads don't need it.
When we call `_Unwind_CallPersonality`, we store some necessary info in
a data structure called `__wasm_lpad_context` of type
`_Unwind_LandingPadContext`, which is defined in the wasm's port of
libunwind in Emscripten. Also the personality wrapper function returns
some info (selector and the caught pointer) in that data structure, so
it is used as a medium for communication.
One of the info we need to store is the address for LSDA info for the
current function. `wasm.lsda()` intrinsic returns that address. (This
intrinsic will be lowered to a symbol that points to the LSDA address.)
The simpliest thing is call `wasm.lsda()` every time we need to call
`_Unwind_CallPersonality` and store that info in `__wasm_lpad_context`
data structure. But we tried to be better than that (D77423 and some
more previous CLs), so if catchpad A dominates catchpad B and catchpad A
is not `catch (...)`, we didn't insert `wasm.lsda()` call in catchpad B,
thinking that the LSDA address is the same for a single function and we
already visited catchpad A and `__wasm_lpad_context.lsda` field would
already have that value.
But this can be incorrect if there is a call to another function, which
also can have the personality function and LSDA, between catchpad A and
catchpad B, because `__wasm_lpad_context` is a globally defined
structure and the callee function will overwrite its `lsda` field.
So in this CL we don't try to do any optimizaions on adding
`wasm.lsda()` call; we store the result of `wasm.lsda()` every time we
call `_Unwind_CallPersonality`. We can do some complicated analysis,
like checking if there is a function call between the dominating
catchpad and the current catchpad, but at this time it seems overkill.
This deletes three tests because they all tested `wasm.ldsa()` call
optimization.
Fixes https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13548.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97309
