The same bots fail but I believe I know what the issue is now. These bots are
missing the const_iterator versions of insert/emplace/etc. that were introduced
in C++11.
llvm-svn: 317042
Change the map key from DIFile* to the absolute path string. Computing
the absolute path isn't expensive because we already have a map that
caches the full path keyed on DIFile*.
llvm-svn: 317041
Multi-instruction emission needs to ensure the the instructions are generated
a depth-first fashion. For example:
(ADDWrr (SUBWrr a, b), c)
needs to emit the SUBWrr before the ADDWrr. However, our walk over
TreePatternNode's is highly context sensitive which makes it difficult to append
BuildMIActions in the order we want. To fix this, we now keep track of the
insertion point as we add actions. This will allow multi-insn emission to insert
BuildMI's in the correct place.
The previous commit failed on the Ubuntu bots using GCC 4.8. These bots didn't
like a call to emplace(). I've replaced it with insert() to see if it's a quirk
of the C++11 support.
llvm-svn: 317040
Multi-instruction emission needs to ensure the the instructions are generated
a depth-first fashion. For example:
(ADDWrr (SUBWrr a, b), c)
needs to emit the SUBWrr before the ADDWrr. However, our walk over
TreePatternNode's is highly context sensitive which makes it difficult to append
BuildMIActions in the order we want. To fix this, we now keep track of the
insertion point as we add actions. This will allow multi-insn emission to insert
BuildMI's in the correct place.
llvm-svn: 317029
Multi-instruction emission will require that we have separate handling for
the defs between the implicitly created temporaries and the rule outputs.
The former require new temporary vregs while the latter should copy existing
operands. Factor out the implicit def/use renderers to minimize the code
duplication when we implement that.
llvm-svn: 317025
Currently the selects are created with the names of their inputs concatenated together. It's possible to get cases that chain these selects together resulting in long names due to multiple levels of concatenation. Our internal branch of llvm managed to generate names over 100000 characters in length on a particular test due to an extreme compounding of the names.
This patch changes the name to a generic name that is not dependent on its inputs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39440
llvm-svn: 317024
A future commit will change how some of the value names in the IR are generated which causes these tests to break in their current form. The script generates checks with regular expressions so it should be immune.
llvm-svn: 317023
Prepare for multiple instruction emission by allowing BuildMIAction to
search for a suitable matcher that will support mutation.
This patch deliberately neglects to add matchers aside from the root to
preserve NFC. That said, it should be noted that until we support mutations
other than just the opcode the chances of finding a non-root instruction
for which canMutate() is true, is essentially zero. Furthermore in the
presence of multi-instruction emission the chances of finding any
instruction for which canMutate() is true is also zero. Nevertheless, we
can't continue to require that all BuildMIAction's consider the root of the match
to be recyclable due to the risk of recycling it twice in the same rule.
llvm-svn: 317022
Previously, we call write(2) for each 32767 byte chunk. That is not
efficient because Linux can handle much larger write requests.
This patch changes the chunk size on Linux to 1 GiB.
This patch also changes the default chunks size to SSIZE_MAX. I think
that doesn't in practice change this function's behavior on any operating
system because SSIZE_MAX on 64-bit machine is unrealistically large,
and writing 2 GiB (SSIZE_MAX on 32-bit) on a 32-bit machine by a single
call of write(2) is also unrealistic, as the userspace is usually
limited to 2 GiB. That said, it is in general a good thing to do because
a write larger than SSIZE_MAX is implementation-defined in POSIX.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39444
llvm-svn: 317015
Fixes a bunch of assert-on-invalid-bitcode regressions after 315483.
Expected<> calls assertIsChecked() in its dtor, and operator bool() only calls
setChecked() if there's no error. So for functions that don't return an error
itself, the Expected<> version needs explicit code to disarm the error that the
ErrorOr<> code didn't need.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39437
llvm-svn: 317010
Summary: The loop invariant add (i+j) is reassoicated, I think the FIXME can be removed, because this is what the test case tries to check (AFAIK). I also changed the test to use FileCheck.
Reviewers: mcrosier, davide
Reviewed By: mcrosier, davide
Subscribers: davide, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39424
llvm-svn: 317000
This patch adds the --threads option to dsymutil to process
architectures in parallel. The feature is already present in the version
distributed with Xcode, but was not yet upstreamed.
This is NFC as far as the linking behavior is concerned. As threads are
used automatically, the current tests cover the change in
implementation.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39355
llvm-svn: 316999
Summary:
Use 64 instead of 32 bits of the module hash as the suffix when renaming
after promotion to reduce the likelihood of a collision (which we
observed in a binary when using 32 bits).
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits, inglorion
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39443
llvm-svn: 316996
If a select instruction tests the returned flag of a cmpxchg instruction and
selects between the returned value of the cmpxchg instruction and its compare
operand, the result of the select will always be equal to its false value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39383
llvm-svn: 316994
Based on similar python tool - utils/shuffle-fuzz.py - this tool extends the ability of it's previous by optionally attaching select instruction to the generated shufflevector instructions.
This was mainly developed to perform exhaustive testing of the X86 AVX512 masked shuffle instructions. But yet it can be used for various other targets.
The general design of the implementation is much modular than the original shuffle_fuzz.py tool, which makes it easier for anyone to extend it further.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38031
Change-Id: I0efc2aaa091b61a8a9552311c21cc77916a97111
llvm-svn: 316989
The optimisation remarks for loop unrolling with an unrolled remainder looks something like:
test.c:7:18: remark: completely unrolled loop with 3 iterations [-Rpass=loop-unroll]
C[i] += A[i*N+j];
^
test.c:6:9: remark: unrolled loop by a factor of 4 with run-time trip count [-Rpass=loop-unroll]
for(int j = 0; j < N; j++)
^
This removes the first of the two messages.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38725
llvm-svn: 316986
extract subvector of vXi1 from vYi1 is poorly supported by LLVM and most of the time end with an assertion.
This patch fixes this issue by adding new patterns to the TD file.
Reviewers:
1. guyblank
2. igorb
3. zvi
4. ayman
5. craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39292
Change-Id: Ideb4d7e946c8d40cfce2920891f2d89fe64c58f8
llvm-svn: 316981
Rename `Offset`, `Scale`, `Length` into `Begin`, `Step`, `End` respectively
to make naming of similar entities for Ranges and Range Checks more
consistent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39414
llvm-svn: 316979
Unfortunately, this weakens our ability to do domain fixing when AVX512DQ is not enabled, but it is consistent with our 256-bit behavior.
Maybe we should add custom handling to domain fixing to allow EVEX integer XOR/AND/OR/ANDN to switch to VEX encoded fp instructions if the high registers aren't being used?
llvm-svn: 316978
As noted in the nice block comment, the previous code didn't actually handle multi-entry loops correctly, it just assumed SCEV didn't analyze such loops. Given SCEV has comments to the contrary, that seems a bit suspect. More importantly, the pass actually requires loopsimplify form which ensures a loop-preheader is available. Remove the excessive generaility and shorten the code greatly.
Note that we do successfully analyze many multi-entry loops, but we do so by converting them to single entry loops. See the added test case.
llvm-svn: 316976
This patch fixes the miscompile that happens when PRE hoists loads across guards and
other instructions that don't always pass control flow to their successors. PRE is now prohibited
to hoist across such instructions because there is no guarantee that the load standing after such
instruction is still valid before such instruction. For example, a load from under a guard may be
invalid before the guard in the following case:
int array[LEN];
...
guard(0 <= index && index < LEN);
use(array[index]);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37460
llvm-svn: 316975
Previously, the code returned early from the *function* when it couldn't find a free expansion, it should be returning from the *transform*. I don't have a test case, noticed this via inspection.
As a follow up, I'm going to revisit the logic in the extract function. I think that essentially the whole helper routine can be replaced with SCEVExpander, but I wanted to do that in a series of separate commits.
llvm-svn: 316974
`check_linker_flags` currently sets the *compiler* flags (via
`CMAKE_REQUIRED_FLAGS`), and thus implicitly relies on cmake's default
behavior of passing the compiler flags to the linker. This breaks when
cmake's build rules have been altered to not pollute the link line with
compiler flags (which can be desirable for build cleanliness). Instead,
set `CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS` explicitly and use `CMP0056` to ensure the
linker flags are passed along. Additionally, since we're inside a
function, we can just alter the variable directly (as the alteration
will be limited to the scope of the function) rather than saving and
restoring the old value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39431
llvm-svn: 316972
Issue found by llvm-isel-fuzzer on OSS fuzz, https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=3725
If anyone actually cares about > 64 bit arithmetic, there's a lot more to do in this area. There's a bunch of obviously wrong code in the same function. I don't have the time to fix all of them and am just using this to understand what the workflow for fixing fuzzer cases might look like.
llvm-svn: 316967
