encountered while building llvm-gcc for arm. This is probably the same issue
that the ppc buildbot hit. llvm::prior works on a MachineBasicBlock::iterator,
not a plain MachineInstr.
llvm-svn: 113983
backing out following to get it back to green,
so I can investigate in peace:
svn merge -c -113840 llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/arm-and-tst-peephole.ll
svn merge -c -113876 -c -113839 llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMBaseInstrInfo.cpp
llvm-svn: 113980
to expose greater opportunities for store narrowing in codegen. This patch fixes a potential
infinite loop in instcombine caused by one of the introduced transforms being overly aggressive.
llvm-svn: 113763
to use AddrMode4, there was a count of the registers stored in one of the
operands. I changed that to just count the operands but forgot to adjust for
the size of D registers. This was noticed by Evan as a performance problem
but it is a potential correctness bug as well, since it is possible that this
could merge a base update with a non-matching immediate.
llvm-svn: 113576
take multiple cycles to decode.
For the current if-converter clients (actually only ARM), the instructions that
are predicated on false are not nops. They would still take machine cycles to
decode. Micro-coded instructions such as LDM / STM can potentially take multiple
cycles to decode. If-converter should take treat them as non-micro-coded
simple instructions.
llvm-svn: 113570
vabd intrinsic and add and/or zext operations. In the case of vaba, this
also avoids the need for a DAG combine pattern to combine vabd with add.
Update tests. Auto-upgrade the old intrinsics.
llvm-svn: 112941
add, and subtract operations with zero-extended or sign-extended vectors.
Update tests. Add auto-upgrade support for the old intrinsics.
llvm-svn: 112773
int x(int t) {
if (t & 256)
return -26;
return 0;
}
We generate this:
tst.w r0, #256
mvn r0, #25
it eq
moveq r0, #0
while gcc generates this:
ands r0, r0, #256
it ne
mvnne r0, #25
bx lr
Scandalous really!
During ISel time, we can look for this particular pattern. One where we have a
"MOVCC" that uses the flag off of a CMPZ that itself is comparing an AND
instruction to 0. Something like this (greatly simplified):
%r0 = ISD::AND ...
ARMISD::CMPZ %r0, 0 @ sets [CPSR]
%r0 = ARMISD::MOVCC 0, -26 @ reads [CPSR]
All we have to do is convert the "ISD::AND" into an "ARM::ANDS" that sets [CPSR]
when it's zero. The zero value will all ready be in the %r0 register and we only
need to change it if the AND wasn't zero. Easy!
llvm-svn: 112664
all the other LDM/STM instructions. This fixes asm printer crashes when
compiling with -O0. I've changed one of the NEON tests (vst3.ll) to run
with -O0 to check this in the future.
Prior to this change VLDM/VSTM used addressing mode #5, but not really.
The offset field was used to hold a count of the number of registers being
loaded or stored, and the AM5 opcode field was expanded to specify the IA
or DB mode, instead of the standard ADD/SUB specifier. Much of the backend
was not aware of these special cases. The crashes occured when rewriting
a frameindex caused the AM5 offset field to be changed so that it did not
have a valid submode. I don't know exactly what changed to expose this now.
Maybe we've never done much with -O0 and NEON. Regardless, there's no longer
any reason to keep a count of the VLDM/VSTM registers, so we can use
addressing mode #4 and clean things up in a lot of places.
llvm-svn: 112322
float t1(int argc) {
return (argc == 1123) ? 1.234f : 2.38213f;
}
We would generate truly awful code on ARM (those with a weak stomach should look
away):
_t1:
movw r1, #1123
movs r2, #1
movs r3, #0
cmp r0, r1
mov.w r0, #0
it eq
moveq r0, r2
movs r1, #4
cmp r0, #0
it ne
movne r3, r1
adr r0, #LCPI1_0
ldr r0, [r0, r3]
bx lr
The problem was that legalization was creating a cascade of SELECT_CC nodes, for
for the comparison of "argc == 1123" which was fed into a SELECT node for the ?:
statement which was itself converted to a SELECT_CC node. This is because the
ARM back-end doesn't have custom lowering for SELECT nodes, so it used the
default "Expand".
I added a fairly simple "LowerSELECT" to the ARM back-end. It takes care of this
testcase, but can obviously be expanded to include more cases.
Now we generate this, which looks optimal to me:
_t1:
movw r1, #1123
movs r2, #0
cmp r0, r1
adr r0, #LCPI0_0
it eq
moveq r2, #4
ldr r0, [r0, r2]
bx lr
.align 2
LCPI0_0:
.long 1075344593 @ float 2.382130e+00
.long 1067316150 @ float 1.234000e+00
llvm-svn: 110799
Without this what was happening was:
* R3 is not marked as "used"
* ARM backend thinks it has to save it to the stack because of vaarg
* Offset computation correctly ignores it
* Offsets are wrong
llvm-svn: 110446
