One performs: (X == 13 | X == 14) -> X-13 <u 2
The other: (A == C1 || A == C2) -> (A & ~(C1 ^ C2)) == C1
The problem is that there are certain values of C1 and C2 that
trigger both transforms but the first one blocks out the second,
this generates suboptimal code.
Reordering the transforms should be better in every case and
allows us to do interesting stuff like turn:
%shr = lshr i32 %X, 4
%and = and i32 %shr, 15
%add = add i32 %and, -14
%tobool = icmp ne i32 %add, 0
into:
%and = and i32 %X, 240
%tobool = icmp ne i32 %and, 224
llvm-svn: 179493
SDNodes and MachineOperands get target flags representing the %hi() and
%lo() assembly annotations that eventually become relocations.
Also define flags to be used by the 64-bit code models.
llvm-svn: 179468
Leaving MFCR has having unmodeled side effects is not enough to prevent
unwanted instruction reordering post-RA. We could probably apply a stronger
barrier attribute, but there is a better way: Add all (not just the first) CR
to be spilled as live-in to the entry block, and add all CRs to the MFCR
instruction as implicitly killed.
Unfortunately, I don't have a small test case.
llvm-svn: 179465
This is basically the same fix in three different places. We use a set to avoid
walking the whole tree of a big ConstantExprs multiple times.
For example: (select cmp, (add big_expr 1), (add big_expr 2))
We don't want to visit big_expr twice here, it may consist of thousands of
nodes.
The testcase exercises this by creating an insanely large ConstantExprs out of
a loop. It's questionable if the optimizer should ever create those, but this
can be triggered with real C code. Fixes PR15714.
llvm-svn: 179458
For functions that need to spill CRs, and have dynamic stack allocations, the
value of the SP during the restore is not what it was during the save, and so
we need to use the FP in these cases (as for all of the other spills and
restores, but the CR restore has a special code path because its reserved slot,
like the link register, is specified directly relative to the adjusted SP).
llvm-svn: 179457
The initial values were arbitrary. I want them to be more
conservative. This represents the number of latency cycles hidden by
OOO execution. In practice, I think it should be within a small factor
of the complex floating point operation latency so the scheduler can
make some attempt to hide latency even for smallish blocks.
These are by no means the best values, just a starting point for
tuning heuristics. Some benchmarks such as TSVC run faster with this
lower value for SandyBridge. I haven't run anything on Haswell, but
it's shouldn't be 2x SB.
llvm-svn: 179450
The register allocator expects minimal physreg live ranges. Schedule
physreg copies accordingly. This is slightly tricky when they occur in
the middle of the scheduling region. For now, this is handled by
rescheduling the copy when its associated instruction is
scheduled. Eventually we may instead bundle them, but only if we can
preserve the bundles as parallel copies during regalloc.
llvm-svn: 179449
I need to handle this for the test case in my following scheduler
commit.
Work is already under way to redesign the mechanism for node order
propagation because this case by case approach is unmaintainable.
llvm-svn: 179448
