Older Book-E cores, such as the PPC 440, support only msync (which has the same
encoding as sync 0), but not any of the other sync forms. Newer Book-E cores,
however, do support sync, and for performance reasons we should allow the use
of the more-general form.
This refactors msync use into its own feature group so that it applies by
default only to older Book-E cores (of the relevant cores, we only have
definitions for the PPC440/450 currently).
llvm-svn: 218923
Summary:
Atomic loads and store of up to the native size (32 bits, or 64 for PPC64)
can be lowered to a simple load or store instruction (as the synchronization
is already handled by AtomicExpand, and the atomicity is guaranteed thanks to
the alignment requirements of atomic accesses). This is exactly what this patch
does. Previously, these were implemented by complex
load-linked/store-conditional loops.. an obvious performance problem.
For example, this patch turns
```
define void @store_i8_unordered(i8* %mem) {
store atomic i8 42, i8* %mem unordered, align 1
ret void
}
```
from
```
_store_i8_unordered: ; @store_i8_unordered
; BB#0:
rlwinm r2, r3, 3, 27, 28
li r4, 42
xori r5, r2, 24
rlwinm r2, r3, 0, 0, 29
li r3, 255
slw r4, r4, r5
slw r3, r3, r5
and r4, r4, r3
LBB4_1: ; =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
lwarx r5, 0, r2
andc r5, r5, r3
or r5, r4, r5
stwcx. r5, 0, r2
bne cr0, LBB4_1
; BB#2:
blr
```
into
```
_store_i8_unordered: ; @store_i8_unordered
; BB#0:
li r2, 42
stb r2, 0(r3)
blr
```
which looks like a pretty clear win to me.
Test Plan:
fixed the tests + new test for indexed accesses + make check-all
Reviewers: jfb, wschmidt, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5587
llvm-svn: 218922
It was hacky to use an opcode as a switch because it won't always match
(rsqrte != sqrte), and it looks like we'll need to add more special casing
per arch than I had hoped for. Eg, x86 will prefer a different NR estimate
implementation. ARM will want to use it's 'step' instructions. There also
don't appear to be any new estimate instructions in any arch in a long,
long time. Altivec vloge and vexpte may have been the first and last in
that field...
llvm-svn: 218698
This is purely refactoring. No functional changes intended. PowerPC is the only target
that is currently using this interface.
The ultimate goal is to allow targets other than PowerPC (certainly X86 and Aarch64) to turn this:
z = y / sqrt(x)
into:
z = y * rsqrte(x)
And:
z = y / x
into:
z = y * rcpe(x)
using whatever HW magic they can use. See http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20900 .
There is one hook in TargetLowering to get the target-specific opcode for an estimate instruction
along with the number of refinement steps needed to make the estimate usable.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5484
llvm-svn: 218553
Summary:
This patch makes use of AtomicExpandPass in Power for inserting fences around
atomic as part of an effort to remove fence insertion from SelectionDAGBuilder.
As a big bonus, it lets us use sync 1 (lightweight sync, often used by the mnemonic
lwsync) instead of sync 0 (heavyweight sync) in many cases.
I also added a test, as there was no test for the barriers emitted by the Power
backend for atomic loads and stores.
Test Plan: new test + make check-all
Reviewers: jfb
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5180
llvm-svn: 218331
This is purely a plumbing patch. No functional changes intended.
The ultimate goal is to allow targets other than PowerPC (certainly X86 and Aarch64) to turn this:
z = y / sqrt(x)
into:
z = y * rsqrte(x)
using whatever HW magic they can use. See http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20900 .
The first step is to add a target hook for RSQRTE, take the already target-independent code selfishly hoarded by PPC, and put it into DAGCombiner.
Next steps:
The code in DAGCombiner::BuildRSQRTE() should be refactored further; tests that exercise that logic need to be added.
Logic in PPCTargetLowering::BuildRSQRTE() should be hoisted into DAGCombiner.
X86 and AArch64 overrides for TargetLowering.BuildRSQRTE() should be added.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5425
llvm-svn: 218219
The heuristic used by DAGCombine to form FMAs checks that the FMUL has only one
use, but this is overly-conservative on some systems. Specifically, if the FMA
and the FADD have the same latency (and the FMA does not compete for resources
with the FMUL any more than the FADD does), there is no need for the
restriction, and furthermore, forming the FMA leaving the FMUL can still allow
for higher overall throughput and decreased critical-path length.
Here we add a new TLI callback, enableAggressiveFMAFusion, false by default, to
elide the hasOneUse check. This is enabled for PowerPC by default, as most
PowerPC systems will benefit.
Patch by Olivier Sallenave, thanks!
llvm-svn: 218120
shim between the TargetTransformInfo immutable pass and the Subtarget
via the TargetMachine and Function. Migrate a single call from
BasicTargetTransformInfo as an example and provide shims where TargetMachine
begins taking a Function to determine the subtarget.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 218004
For PPC targets, FastISel does not take the sign extension information into account when selecting return instructions whose operands are constants. A consequence of this is that the return of boolean values is not correct. This patch fixes the problem by evaluating the sign extension information also for constants, forwarding this information to PPCMaterializeInt which takes this information to drive the sign extension during the materialization.
llvm-svn: 217993
Inline asm may specify 'U' and 'X' constraints to print a 'u' for an
update-form memory reference, or an 'x' for an indexed-form memory
reference. However, these are really only useful in GCC internal code
generation. In inline asm the operand of the memory constraint is
typically just a register containing the address, so 'U' and 'X' make
no sense.
This patch quietly accepts 'U' and 'X' in inline asm patterns, but
otherwise does nothing. If we ever unexpectedly see a non-register,
we'll assert and sort it out afterwards.
I've added a new test for these constraints; the test case should be
used for other asm-constraints changes down the road.
llvm-svn: 217622
"Unroll" is not the appropriate name for this variable. Clang already uses
the term "interleave" in pragmas and metadata for this.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5066
llvm-svn: 217528
This is the final round of renaming. This changes tblgen to emit lower-case
function names for FastEmitInst_* and FastEmit_*, and updates all its uses
in the source code.
Reviewed by Eric
llvm-svn: 217075
r208640 was reverted because it caused a self-hosting failure on ppc64. The
underlying cause was the formation of ISD::ADD nodes with ISD::TargetConstant
operands. Because we have no patterns for 'add' taking 'timm' nodes, these are
selected as r+r add instructions (which is a miscompile). Guard against this
kind of behavior in the future by making the backend crash should this occur
(instead of silently generating invalid output).
llvm-svn: 216897
This patch adds support to recognize division by uniform power of 2 and modifies the cost table to vectorize division by uniform power of 2 whenever possible.
Updates Cost model for Loop and SLP Vectorizer.The cost table is currently only updated for X86 backend.
Thanks to Hal, Andrea, Sanjay for the review. (http://reviews.llvm.org/D4971)
llvm-svn: 216371
Adds code generation support for dcbtst (data cache prefetch for write) and
icbt (instruction cache prefetch for read - Book E cores only).
We still end up with a 'cannot select' error for the non-supported prefetch
intrinsic forms. This will be fixed in a later commit.
Fixes PR20692.
llvm-svn: 216339
isPow2DivCheap
That name doesn't specify signed or unsigned.
Lazy as I am, I eventually read the function and variable comments. It turns out that this is strictly about signed div. But I discovered that the comments are wrong:
srl/add/sra
is not the general sequence for signed integer division by power-of-2. We need one more 'sra':
sra/srl/add/sra
That's the sequence produced in DAGCombiner. The first 'sra' may be removed when dividing by exactly '2', but that's a special case.
This patch corrects the comments, changes the name of the flag bit, and changes the name of the accessor methods.
No functional change intended.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5010
llvm-svn: 216237
ARM in particular is getting dangerously close to exceeding 32 bits worth of
possible subtarget features. When this happens, various parts of MC start to
fail inexplicably as masks get truncated to "unsigned".
Mostly just refactoring at present, and there's probably no way to test.
llvm-svn: 215887
A byval object, even if allocated at a fixed offset (prescribed by the ABI) is
pointed to by IR values. Most fixed-offset stack objects are not pointed-to by
IR values, so the default is to assume this is not possible. However, we need
to override the default in this case (instruction scheduling can cause
miscompiles otherwise).
Fixes PR20280.
llvm-svn: 215795
On PPC/Darwin, byval arguments occur at fixed stack offsets in the callee's
frame, but are not immutable -- the pointer value is directly available to the
higher-level code as the address of the argument, and the value of the byval
argument can be modified at the IR level.
This is necessary, but not sufficient, to fix PR20280. When PR20280 is fixed in
a follow-up commit, its test case will cover this change.
llvm-svn: 215793
The LDinto_toc pattern has been part of 64-bit PowerPC for a long
time, and represents loading from a memory location into the TOC
register (X2). However, this pattern doesn't explicitly record that
it modifies that register. This patch adds the missing dependency.
It was very surprising to me that this has never shown up as a problem
in the past, and that we only saw this problem recently in a single
scenario when building a self-hosted clang. It turns out that in most
cases we have another dependency present that keeps the LDinto_toc
instruction tied in place. LDinto_toc is used for TOC restore
following a call site, so this is a typical sequence:
BCTRL8 <regmask>, %CTR8<imp-use>, %RM<imp-use>, %X3<imp-use>, %X12<imp-use>, %X1<imp-def>, ...
LDinto_toc 24, %X1
ADJCALLSTACKUP 96, 0, %R1<imp-def>, %R1<imp-use>
Because the LDinto_toc is inserted prior to the ADJCALLSTACKUP, there
is a natural anti-dependency between the two that keeps it in place.
Therefore we don't usually see a problem. However, in one particular
case, one call is followed immediately by another call, and the second
call requires a parameter that is a TOC-relative address. This is the
code sequence:
BCTRL8 <regmask>, %CTR8<imp-use>, %RM<imp-use>, %X3<imp-use>, %X4<imp-use>, %X5<imp-use>, %X12<imp-use>, %X1<imp-def>, ...
LDinto_toc 24, %X1
ADJCALLSTACKUP 96, 0, %R1<imp-def>, %R1<imp-use>
ADJCALLSTACKDOWN 96, %R1<imp-def>, %R1<imp-use>
%vreg39<def> = ADDIStocHA %X2, <ga:@.str>; G8RC_and_G8RC_NOX0:%vreg39
%vreg40<def> = ADDItocL %vreg39<kill>, <ga:@.str>; G8RC:%vreg40 G8RC_and_G8RC_NOX0:%vreg39
Note that the back-to-back stack adjustments are the same size! The
back end is smart enough to recognize this and optimize them away:
BCTRL8 <regmask>, %CTR8<imp-use>, %RM<imp-use>, %X3<imp-use>, %X4<imp-use>, %X5<imp-use>, %X12<imp-use>, %X1<imp-def>, ...
LDinto_toc 24, %X1
%vreg39<def> = ADDIStocHA %X2, <ga:@.str>; G8RC_and_G8RC_NOX0:%vreg39
%vreg40<def> = ADDItocL %vreg39<kill>, <ga:@.str>; G8RC:%vreg40 G8RC_and_G8RC_NOX0:%vreg39
Now there is nothing to prevent the ADDIStocHA instruction from moving
ahead of the LDinto_toc instruction, and because of the longest-path
heuristic, this is what happens.
With the accompanying patch, %X2 is represented as an implicit def:
BCTRL8 <regmask>, %CTR8<imp-use>, %RM<imp-use>, %X3<imp-use>, %X4<imp-use>, %X5<imp-use>, %X12<imp-use>, %X1<imp-def>, ...
LDinto_toc 24, %X1, %X2<imp-def,dead>
ADJCALLSTACKUP 96, 0, %R1<imp-def,dead>, %R1<imp-use>
ADJCALLSTACKDOWN 96, %R1<imp-def,dead>, %R1<imp-use>
%vreg39<def> = ADDIStocHA %X2, <ga:@.str>; G8RC_and_G8RC_NOX0:%vreg39
%vreg40<def> = ADDItocL %vreg39<kill>, <ga:@.str>; G8RC:%vreg40 G8RC_and_G8RC_NOX0:%vreg39
So now when the two stack adjustments are removed, ADDIStocHA is
prevented from being moved above LDinto_toc.
I have not yet created a test case for this, because the original
failure occurs on a relatively large function that needs reduction.
However, this is a fairly serious bug, despite its infrequency, and I
wanted to get this patch onto the list as soon as possible so that it
can be considered for a 3.5 backport. I'll work on whittling down a
test case.
Have we missed the boat for 3.5 at this point?
Thanks,
Bill
llvm-svn: 215685
Add header guards to files that were missing guards. Remove #endif comments
as they don't seem common in LLVM (we can easily add them back if we decide
they're useful)
Changes made by clang-tidy with minor tweaks.
llvm-svn: 215558
This implements PPCTargetLowering::getTgtMemIntrinsic for Altivec load/store
intrinsics. As with the construction of the MachineMemOperands for the
intrinsic calls used for unaligned load/store lowering, the only slight
complication is that we need to represent a larger memory range than the
loaded/stored value-type size (because the address is rounded down to an
aligned address, and we need to conservatively represent the entire possible
range of the actual access). This required adding an extra size field to
TargetLowering::IntrinsicInfo, and this was done in a way that required no
modifications to other targets (the size defaults to the store size of the
provided memory data type).
This fixes test/CodeGen/PowerPC/unal-altivec-wint.ll (so it can be un-XFAILed).
llvm-svn: 215512
