We also want to optimise tests like this: return a*b == 0. The MULS
instruction is flag setting, so we don't need the CMP instruction but can
instead branch on the result of the MULS. The generated instructions sequence
for this example was: MULS, MOVS, MOVS, CMP. The MOVS instruction load the
boolean values resulting from the select instruction, but these MOVS
instructions are flag setting and were thus preventing this optimisation. Now
we first reorder and move the MULS to before the CMP and generate sequence
MOVS, MOVS, MULS, CMP so that the optimisation could trigger. Reordering of the
MULS and MOVS is safe to do because the subsequent MOVS instructions just set
the CPSR register and don't use it, i.e. the CPSR is dead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27990
llvm-svn: 292608
Simplify a packss/packus truncation based on the elements of the mask that are actually demanded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28777
llvm-svn: 292591
Like several other loop passes (the vectorizer, etc) this pass doesn't
really fit the model of a loop pass. The critical distinction is that it
isn't intended to be pipelined together with other loop passes. I plan
to add some documentation to the loop pass manager to make this more
clear on that side.
LoopSink is also different because it doesn't really need a lot of the
infrastructure of our loop passes. For example, if there aren't loop
invariant instructions causing a preheader to exist, there is no need to
form a preheader. It also doesn't need LCSSA because this pass is
only involved in sinking invariant instructions from a preheader into
the loop, not reasoning about live-outs.
This allows some nice simplifications to the pass in the new PM where we
can directly walk the loops once without restructuring them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28921
llvm-svn: 292589
Hunt down some of the places where we use bare addReg(0) or addImm(AL).addReg(0)
and replace with add(condCodeOp()) and add(predOps()). This should make it
easier to understand what those operands represent (without having to look at
the definition of the instruction that we're adding to).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27984
llvm-svn: 292587
Add a sentence that says that the type argument can refer to
either the type of a result, or that of an operand.
Review: Eli Friedman.
llvm-svn: 292584
Part of the assert has been left active for further debugging.
The other part has been turned into a stat for tracking for the
moment.
llvm-svn: 292583
Fix a silly copy-paste error in the tool description. Take the
opportunity to add crash stack printing which will hopefully never be
needed.
llvm-svn: 292579
By default c++filt demangles functions, though you can optionally pass
`-t` to have it decode types as well, behaving nearly identical to
`__cxa_demangle`. Add support for this mode.
llvm-svn: 292576
Calling reset() on an empty BitVector would call memset with a nullptr
argument which is undefined behaviour.
This should fix the sanitizer bot.
llvm-svn: 292575
This reverts SVN r286795. This was incorrect the demangler is expected
to be able to demangle types as well as functions. This makes the
behaviour of itaniumDemangle similar to __cxa_demangle once more.
llvm-svn: 292573
This recommits r292526 which is reverted in r292529 after fixing the test case.
The original summary:
Currently, a GEP is considered free only if its indices are all constant.
TTI::getGEPCost() can give target-specific more accurate analysis. TTI is
already used for the cost of many other instructions.
llvm-svn: 292570
loops in a function.
These are relatively confusing to talk about and compute correctly so it
seems really good to write down their implementation in one place. I've
replaced one place we needed this in the loop PM infrastructure and
I have another place in a pending patch that wants it.
We can't quite use this for the core loop PM walk because there we're
sometimes working on a sub-forest.
I'll add the expected unittests before committing this but wanted to
make sure folks were happy with these names / comments.
Credit goes to Richard Smith for the idea for naming the order where siblings
are in reverse program order but the tree traversal remains preorder.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28932
llvm-svn: 292569
Inline spiller can decide to move a spill as early as possible in the basic block.
It will skip phis and label, but we also need to make sure it skips instructions
in the basic block prologue which restore exec mask.
Added isPositionLike callback in TargetInstrInfo to detect instructions which
shall be skipped in addition to common phis, labels etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27997
llvm-svn: 292554
Big functions with large vreg # are quite unwieldy to update.
Change it to have one function per test (it does increase boilerplate,
but makes the core hopefully more readable and maintanable).
llvm-svn: 292552
Big functions with large vreg # are quite unwieldy to update. This test
also relied on legal s8 operations which we're considering removing.
Change it to have one function per test (it does increase boilerplate,
but makes the core hopefully more readable and maintanable), and use
100% legal operations throughout.
llvm-svn: 292551
Running lit tests and unit tests of ASan and TSan on macOS has very bad performance when running with a high number of threads. This is caused by xnu (the macOS kernel), which currently doesn't handle mapping and unmapping of sanitizer shadow regions (reserved VM which are several terabytes large) very well. The situation is so bad that increasing the number of threads actually makes the total testing time larger. The macOS buildbots are affected by this. Note that we can't easily limit the number of sanitizer testing threads without affecting the rest of the tests.
This patch adds a special "group" into lit, and limits the number of concurrently running tests in this group. This helps solve the contention problem, while still allowing other tests to run in full, that means running lit with -j8 will still with 8 threads, and parallelism is only limited in sanitizer tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28420
llvm-svn: 292548
It's easier to test the non-fallback path if we just drop these
intrinsics for now, like we did before we added the fallback path.
We'll obviously need to fix this properly, but the fixme for that is
already here.
llvm-svn: 292547
Summary:
Fence instructions are currently marked as `ModRef` for all memory locations.
We can improve this for constant memory locations (such as constant globals),
since fence instructions cannot modify these locations.
This helps us to forward constant loads across fences (added test case in GVN).
There were no changes in behaviour for similar test cases in early-cse and licm.
Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28914
llvm-svn: 292546
Rather than trying to find MF based on the possibly-null MI we've
passed in here, just pass it in directly. It's already available at
all callers anyway.
llvm-svn: 292544
This function can be used to accumulate the set of all read and modified
register in a sequence of instructions.
Use this code in AArch64A57FPLoadBalancing::scavengeRegister() to prove
the concept.
- The AArch64A57LoadBalancing code is using a backwards analysis now
which is irrespective of kill flags. This is the main motivation for
this change.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22082
llvm-svn: 292543
This is a set of register units intended to track register liveness, it
is similar in spirit to LivePhysRegs.
You can also think of this as the liveness tracking parts of the
RegisterScavenger factored out into an own class.
This was proposed in http://llvm.org/PR27609
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21916
llvm-svn: 292542
Use CHECK-NEXT to verify that a test breaks whenever unexpected passes,
analyses, or invalidations show up in default pipelines. The test case
is constructed so that we don't expect to invalidate anything, and needs
to be kept that way.
The test is slightly less strict than we'd like because of differences
in type pretty-printing.
(Right now it does show some invalidations - all of those are intentional
and temporary.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28887
llvm-svn: 292536
This was being parsed / serialized ad-hoc inside the code
for a specific PDB stream. But this data structure is used
in multiple ways / places within the PDB format. To be able
to re-use it we need to raise this code out and make it more
generic. In doing so, a number of bugs are fixed in the
original implementation, and support is added for growing
the hash table and deleting items from the hash table,
which had either been omitted or incorrect implemented in
the initial version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28715
llvm-svn: 292535
This can prove that:
extern int f;
int g() {
int x = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < 365; ++i) {
x /= f;
}
return x;
}
always returns zero. Thanks to Sanjoy for confirming this
transformation actually made sense (bugs are mine).
llvm-svn: 292531
Use CHECK-NEXT to verify that a test breaks whenever unexpected passes,
analyses, or invalidations show up in default pipelines. The test case
is constructed so that we don't expect to invalidate anything, and needs
to be kept that way.
(Right now it does show some invalidations - all of those are intentional
and temporary.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28887
llvm-svn: 292530
This patch improves the knownbits logic for unsigned integer min/max opcodes.
For UMIN we know that the result will have the maximum of the inputs' known leading zero bits in the result, similarly for UMAX the maximum of the inputs' leading one bits.
This is particularly useful for simplifying clamping patterns,. e.g. as SSE doesn't have a uitofp instruction we want to use sitofp instead where possible and for that we need to confirm that the top bit is not set.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28853
llvm-svn: 292528
Currently, a GEP is considered free only if its indices are all constant.
TTI::getGEPCost() can give target-specific more accurate analysis. TTI is
already used for the cost of many other instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28693
llvm-svn: 292526
