This patch abstract Calls in Inliner:run() to InlineOrder.
With this patch, it's possible to customize the inlining order,
e.g. use queue or priority queue.
Reviewed By: kazu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103315
This pass transforms loops that contain a conditional branch with induction
variable. For example, it transforms left code to right code:
newbound = min(n, c)
while (iv < n) { while(iv < newbound) {
A A
if (iv < c) B
B C
C }
} if (iv != n) {
while (iv < n) {
A
C
}
}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102234
This patch marks the induction increment of the main induction variable
of the vector loop as NUW when not folding the tail.
If the tail is not folded, we know that End - Start >= Step (either
statically or through the minimum iteration checks). We also know that both
Start % Step == 0 and End % Step == 0. We exit the vector loop if %IV +
%Step == %End. Hence we must exit the loop before %IV + %Step unsigned
overflows and we can mark the induction increment as NUW.
This should make SCEV return more precise bounds for the created vector
loops, used by later optimizations, like late unrolling.
At the moment quite a few tests still need to be updated, but before
doing so I'd like to get initial feedback to make sure I am not missing
anything.
Note that this could probably be further improved by using information
from the original IV.
Attempt of modeling of the assumption in Alive2:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/H_DL_g
Part of a set of fixes required for PR50412.
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103255
This looks like a mistake when the tests were committed in r363946.
There were two sets of tests for the f32 variant of these instructions,
instead of one set for f16 and one set for f32.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103699
Summary: The patch implements the mapping of the Yaml
information to XCOFF object file to enable the yaml2obj
tool for XCOFF. Currently only 32-bit is supported.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, shchenz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95505
We should be exiting when the shift amount is greater than
the bit width regardless of whether it is a power of 2.
Reported by Simon Pilgrim here https://reviews.llvm.org/D96661
This requires getting a shift amount that is out of bounds that
wasn't already optimized by SelectionDAG. This would be pretty
trick to construct a test for.
Or it would require a non-power of 2 shift amount and a mask
that has runs of ones and zeros of the next lowest power of 2 from
that shift amount. I tried a little to produce a test for this,
but didn't get it to work.
Don't require a specific kind of IRBuilder for TargetLowering hooks.
This allows us to drop the IRBuilder.h include from TargetLowering.h.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103759
Use cast<> instead which will assert that the cast is correct and not just return null - the match() should have already failed if the cast isn't valid anyhow.
Fixes static analysis warning.
This patch abstract Calls in Inliner:run() to InlineOrder.
With this patch, it's possible to customize the inlining order, i.e. use queue or priority queue.
Reviewed By: kazu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103315
This NEG node is just a vector negation, easily represented as a SUB
zero. Removing it from the one place it is generated is essentially an
NFC, but can allow some extra folding. The updated tests are now loading
different constant literals, which have already been negated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103703
That's how it was originally intended but that wasn't possible because
we still needed to support older CMake versions.
The problem here is that the sources in TableGenGlobalISel are meant to
be linked into both llvm-tblgen and TableGenTests (a unit test), but not
be part of LLVM proper. So they shouldn't be an ordinary LLVM component.
Because they are used in llvm-tblgen, they can't draw in the LLVM dylib
dependency, but then we'd have to do the same thing in TableGenTests to
make sure we don't link both a static Support library and another copy
through the LLVM dylib.
With an object library we're just reusing the object files and don't
have to care about dependencies at all.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74588
