This patch adds a pass for doing PowerPC peephole optimizations at the
MI level while the code is still in SSA form. This allows for easy
modifications to the instructions while depending on a subsequent pass
of DCE. Both passes are very fast due to the characteristics of SSA.
At this time, the only peepholes added are for cleaning up various
redundancies involving the XXPERMDI instruction. However, I would
expect this will be a useful place to add more peepholes for
inefficiencies generated during instruction selection. The pass is
placed after VSX swap optimization, as it is best to let that pass
remove unnecessary swaps before performing any remaining clean-ups.
The utility of these clean-ups are demonstrated by changes to four
existing test cases, all of which now have tighter expected code
generation. I've also added Eric Schweiz's bugpoint-reduced test from
PR25157, for which we now generate tight code. One other test started
failing for me, and I've fixed it
(test/Transforms/PlaceSafepoints/finite-loops.ll) as well; this is not
related to my changes, and I'm not sure why it works before and not
after. The problem is that the CHECK-NOT: of "statepoint" from test1
fails because of the "statepoint" in test2, and so forth. Adding a
CHECK-LABEL in between keeps the different occurrences of that string
properly scoped.
llvm-svn: 252651
ARM V6T2 has instructions for efficient count-leading/trailing-zeros, so this should be
considered a cheap operation (and therefore fair game for speculation) for any ARM V6T2
implementation.
The net result of allowing this speculation for the regression tests in this patch is
that we get this code:
ctlz:
clz r0, r0
bx lr
cttz:
rbit r0, r0
clz r0, r0
bx lr
Instead of:
ctlz:
cmp r0, #0
moveq r0, #32
clzne r0, r0
bx lr
cttz:
cmp r0, #0
moveq r0, #32
rbitne r0, r0
clzne r0, r0
bx lr
This will help solve a general speculation/despeculation problem noted in PR24818:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24818
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14469
llvm-svn: 252639
AArch64 has instructions for efficient count-leading/trailing-zeros, so this should be
considered a cheap operation (and therefore fair game for speculation) for any AArch64
implementation.
The net result of allowing this speculation for the regression tests in this
patch is that we get this code:
ctlz:
clz w0, w0
ret
cttz:
rbit w8, w0
clz w0, w8
ret
Instead of:
ctlz:
cbz w0, .LBB0_2
clz w0, w0
ret
.LBB0_2:
orr w0, wzr, #0x20
ret
cttz:
cbz w0, .LBB1_2
rbit w8, w0
clz w0, w8
ret
.LBB1_2:
orr w0, wzr, #0x20
ret
See D14469 for the larger motivation.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14505
llvm-svn: 252625
Added fixes for stage2 failures: CMOV is not commutable; commuting the operands results in the condition being flipped! d'oh!
Original commit message:
If we have a CMOV, OR and AND combination such as:
if (x & CN)
y |= CM;
And:
* CN is a single bit;
* All bits covered by CM are known zero in y;
Then we can convert this to a sequence of BFI instructions. This will always be a win if CM is a single bit, will always be no worse than the TST & OR sequence if CM is two bits, and for thumb will be no worse if CM is three bits (due to the extra IT instruction).
llvm-svn: 252606
For big-endian targets, when we merge two halfword loads into a word load, the
order of the halfwords in the loaded value is reversed compared to
little-endian, so the load-store optimiser needs to swap the destination
registers.
This does not affect merging of two word loads, as we use ldp, which treats the
memory as two separate 32-bit words.
llvm-svn: 252597
For CoreCLR on Windows, stack probes must be emitted as inline sequences that probe successive stack pages
between the current stack limit and the desired new stack pointer location. This implements support for
the inline expansion on x64.
For in-body alloca probes, expansion is done during instruction lowering. For prolog probes, a stub call
is initially emitted during prolog creation, and expanded after epilog generation, to avoid complications
that arise when introducing new machine basic blocks during prolog and epilog creation.
Added a new test case, modified an existing one to exclude non-x64 coreclr (for now).
Add test case
Fix tests
llvm-svn: 252578
AArch64 has the ability to use the top 8-bits of an "address" for extra
information, with the memory subsystem automatically masking them off for loads
and stores. When that's happening, we can sometimes skip masks on memory
operations in the compiler.
However, this requires the host OS and support stack to preserve those bits so
it can't be enabled everywhere. In principle iOS 8.0 and above do take the
required precautions and but we'll put it under a flag for now.
llvm-svn: 252573
Lower LLVM's 'unreachable' terminator to ISD::TRAP, and lower ISD::TRAP to
wasm's 'unreachable' expression.
WebAssembly type-checks expressions, but a noreturn function with a
return type that doesn't match the context will cause a check
failure. So we lower LLVM 'unreachable' to ISD::TRAP and then lower that
to WebAssembly's 'unreachable' expression, which typechecks in any
context and causes a trap if executed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14515
llvm-svn: 252566
This fixes a bug in ARMAsmPrinter::EmitUnwindingInstruction where
llvm_unreachable was reached because t2ADDri wasn't handled.
Test case provided by Tim Northover.
rdar://problem/23270609
http://reviews.llvm.org/D14518
llvm-svn: 252557
The motivation for this patch starts with the epic fail example in PR18007:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18007
...unfortunately, this patch makes no difference for that case, but it solves some
simpler cases. We'll get there some day. :)
The current 'or' matching code was using computeKnownBits() via
isBaseWithConstantOffset() -> MaskedValueIsZero(), but that's an unnecessarily limited use.
We can do more by copying the logic in ValueTracking's haveNoCommonBitsSet(), so we can
treat the 'or' as if it was an 'add'.
There's a TODO comment here because we should lift the bit-checking logic into a helper
function, so it's not duplicated in DAGCombiner.
An example of the better LEA matching:
leal (%rdi,%rdi), %eax
andl $1, %esi
orl %esi, %eax
Becomes:
andl $1, %esi
leal (%rsi,%rdi,2), %eax
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13956
llvm-svn: 252515
For some reason we'd never run MachineVerifier on WinEH code, and you
explicitly have to ask for it with llc. I added it to a few test cases
to get some coverage.
Fixes PR25461.
llvm-svn: 252512
Summary:
This matches the sum-of-absdiff patterns emitted by the vectoriser using log2 shuffles.
Relies on D14207 to be able to match the `extract_subvector(..., 0)`
Reviewers: t.p.northover, jmolloy
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14208
llvm-svn: 252465
Summary:
Lowering this pattern early to an `EXTRACT_SUBREG` was making it impossible to match larger patterns in tblgen that use `extract_subvector(..., 0)` as part of the their input pattern.
It seems like there will exist somewhere a better way of specifying this pattern over all relevant register value types, but I didn't manage to find it.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, jmolloy
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14207
llvm-svn: 252464
"GCC requires the freestanding environment provide memcpy, memmove, memset
and memcmp": https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-5.2.0/gcc/Standards.html
Hence in GNUEABI targets LLVM should not convert 'memops' to their equivalent
'__aeabi_memops'. This convertion violates GCC contract.
The -meabi flag controls whether or not LLVM will modify 'memops' in GNUEABI
targets.
Without -meabi: use the triple default EABI.
With -meabi=default: use the triple default EABI.
With -meabi=gnu: use 'memops'.
With -meabi=4 or -meabi=5: use '__aeabi_memops'.
With -meabi set to an unknown value: same as -meabi=default.
Patch by Vinicius Tinti.
llvm-svn: 252462
Under most circumstances, if SCEV can simplify X-Y to a constant, then it can
also simplify Y-X to a constant. However, there is no guarantee that this is
always true, and concensus is not to consider that a correctness bug in SCEV
(although it is undesirable).
PPCLoopPreIncPrep gathers pointers used to access memory (via loads, stores and
prefetches) into buckets, where in each bucket the relative pointer offsets are
constant. We used to keep each bucket as a multimap, where SCEV's subtraction
operation was used to define the ordering predicate. Instead, use a fixed SCEV
base expression for each bucket, record the constant offsets from that base
expression, and adjust it later, if desirable, once all pointers have been
collected.
Doing it this way should be more compile-time efficient than the previous
scheme (in addition to making the implementation less sensitive to SCEV
simplification quirks).
Fixes PR25170.
llvm-svn: 252417
The TailDuplication machine pass ran across a malformed CFG: a PHI node
referred it's predecessor's predecessor instead of it's predecessor.
This occurred because we split the edge in X86ISelLowering when we
processed the CATCHRET but forgot to do something about the PHI nodes.
This fixes PR25444.
llvm-svn: 252413
