added back in by X86AsmPrinter::printIntelMemReference() during codegen.
Previously, this following example
void t() {
int i;
__asm mov eax, [i]
}
would generate the below assembly
mov eax, dword ptr [[eax]]
which resulted in a fatal error when compiling. Test case coming on the
clang side.
rdar://13444264
llvm-svn: 177440
an X86Operand, but also performs a Sema lookup and adds the sizing directive
when appropriate. Use this when parsing a bracketed statement. This is
necessary to get the instruction matching correct as well. Test case coming
on clang side.
rdar://13455408
llvm-svn: 177439
We don't want to write out >1000 files at the same time. That could make things
prohibitively expensive. Instead, register the "writeout" function so that it's
emitted serially.
<rdar://problem/12439551>
llvm-svn: 177437
- it is trivially known to be used inside the loop in a way that can not be optimized away
- there is no use outside of the loop which can take advantage of the computation hoisting
llvm-svn: 177432
All pre-increment load patterns need to set the mayLoad flag (since
they don't provide a DAG pattern).
This was missing for LHAUX8 and LWAUX, which is added by this patch.
llvm-svn: 177431
As opposed to to pre-increment store patterns, the pre-increment
load patterns were already using standard memory operands, with
the sole exception of LHAU8.
As there's no real reason why LHAU8 should be different here,
this patch simply rewrites the pattern to also use a memri
operand, just like all the other patterns.
llvm-svn: 177430
Currently, pre-increment store patterns are written to use two separate
operands to represent address base and displacement:
stwu $rS, $ptroff($ptrreg)
This causes problems when implementing the assembler parser, so this
commit changes the patterns to use standard (complex) memory operands
like in all other memory access instruction patterns:
stwu $rS, $dst
To still match those instructions against the appropriate pre_store
SelectionDAG nodes, the patch uses the new feature that allows a Pat
to match multiple DAG operands against a single (complex) instruction
operand.
Approved by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 177429
of complex instruction operands (e.g. address modes).
Currently, if a Pat pattern creates an instruction that has a complex
operand (i.e. one that consists of multiple sub-operands at the MI
level), this operand must match a ComplexPattern DAG pattern with the
correct number of output operands.
This commit extends TableGen to alternatively allow match a complex
operands against multiple separate operands at the DAG level.
This allows using Pat patterns to match pre-increment nodes like
pre_store (which must have separate operands at the DAG level) onto
an instruction pattern that uses a multi-operand memory operand,
like the following example on PowerPC (will be committed as a
follow-on patch):
def STWU : DForm_1<37, (outs ptr_rc:$ea_res), (ins GPRC:$rS, memri:$dst),
"stwu $rS, $dst", LdStStoreUpd, []>,
RegConstraint<"$dst.reg = $ea_res">, NoEncode<"$ea_res">;
def : Pat<(pre_store GPRC:$rS, ptr_rc:$ptrreg, iaddroff:$ptroff),
(STWU GPRC:$rS, iaddroff:$ptroff, ptr_rc:$ptrreg)>;
Here, the pair of "ptroff" and "ptrreg" operands is matched onto the
complex operand "dst" of class "memri" in the "STWU" instruction.
Approved by Jakob Stoklund Olesen.
llvm-svn: 177428
The tocentry operand class refers to 64-bit values (it is only used in 64-bit,
where iPTR is a 64-bit type), but its sole suboperand is designated as 32-bit
type. This causes a mismatch to be detected at compile-time with the TableGen
patch I'll check in shortly.
To fix this, this commit changes the suboperand to a 64-bit type as well.
llvm-svn: 177427
def : Pat<(load (i64 (X86Wrapper tglobaltlsaddr :$dst))),
(MOV64rm tglobaltlsaddr :$dst)>;
This pattern is invalid because the MOV64rm instruction expects a
source operand of type "i64mem", which is a subclass of X86MemOperand
and thus actually consists of five MI operands, but the Pat provides
only a single MI operand ("tglobaltlsaddr" matches an SDnode of
type ISD::TargetGlobalTLSAddress and provides a single output).
Thus, if the pattern were ever matched, subsequent uses of the MOV64rm
instruction pattern would access uninitialized memory. In addition,
with the TableGen patch I'm about to check in, this would actually be
reported as a build-time error.
Fortunately, the pattern does in fact never match, for at least two
independent reasons.
First, the code generator actually never generates a pattern of the
form (load (X86Wrapper (tglobaltlsaddr))). For most combinations of
TLS and code models, (tglobaltlsaddr) represents just an offset that
needs to be added to some base register, so it is never directly
dereferenced. The only exception is the initial-exec model, where
(tglobaltlsaddr) refers to the (pc-relative) address of a GOT slot,
which *is* in fact directly dereferenced: but in that case, the
X86WrapperRIP node is used, not X86Wrapper, so the Pat doesn't match.
Second, even if some patterns along those lines *were* ever generated,
we should not need an extra Pat pattern to match it. Instead, the
original MOV64rm instruction pattern ought to match directly, since
it uses an "addr" operand, which is implemented via the SelectAddr
C++ routine; this routine is supposed to accept the full range of
input DAGs that may be implemented by a single mov instruction,
including those cases involving ISD::TargetGlobalTLSAddress (and
actually does so e.g. in the initial-exec case as above).
To avoid build breaks (due to the above-mentioned error) after the
TableGen patch is checked in, I'm removing this Pat here.
llvm-svn: 177426
Currently the PPC r0 register is unconditionally reserved. There are two reasons
for this:
1. r0 is treated specially (as the constant 0) by certain instructions, and so
cannot be used with those instructions as a regular register.
2. r0 is used as a temporary register in the CR-register spilling process
(where, under some circumstances, we require two GPRs).
This change addresses the first reason by introducing a restricted register
class (without r0) for use by those instructions that treat r0 specially. These
register classes have a new pseudo-register, ZERO, which represents the r0-as-0
use. This has the side benefit of making the existing target code simpler (and
easier to understand), and will make it clear to the register allocator that
uses of r0 as 0 don't conflict will real uses of the r0 register.
Once the CR spilling code is improved, we'll be able to allocate r0.
Adding these extra register classes, for some reason unclear to me, causes
requests to the target to copy 32-bit registers to 64-bit registers. The
resulting code seems correct (and causes no test-suite failures), and the new
test case covers this new kind of asymmetric copy.
As r0 is still reserved, no functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 177423
Remove an accidentally-added instruction definition and add a comment in the
test case. This is in response to a post-commit review by Bill Schmidt.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 177404
The ARM backend currently has poor codegen for long sext/zext
operations, such as v8i8 -> v8i32. This patch addresses this
by performing a custom expansion in ARMISelLowering. It also
adds/changes the cost of such lowering in ARMTTI.
This partially addresses PR14867.
Patch by Pete Couperus
llvm-svn: 177380
For each compile unit, we want to register a function that will flush that
compile unit. Otherwise, __gcov_flush() would only flush the counters within the
current compile unit, and not any outside of it.
PR15191 & <rdar://problem/13167507>
llvm-svn: 177340
PPC64 supports unaligned loads and stores of 64-bit values, but
in order to use the r+i forms, the offset must be a multiple of 4.
Unfortunately, this cannot always be determined by examining the
immediate itself because it might be available only via a TOC entry.
In order to get around this issue, we additionally predicate the
selection of the r+i form on the alignment of the load or store
(forcing it to be at least 4 in order to select the r+i form).
llvm-svn: 177338
The default logic marks them as too expensive.
For example, before this patch we estimated:
cost of 16 for instruction: %r = uitofp <4 x i16> %v0 to <4 x float>
While this translates to:
vmovl.u16 q8, d16
vcvt.f32.u32 q8, q8
All other costs are left to the values assigned by the fallback logic. Theses
costs are mostly reasonable in the sense that they get progressively more
expensive as the instruction sequences emitted get longer.
radar://13445992
llvm-svn: 177334
