Having an enum member named Default is quite confusing: Is it distinct
from the others?
This patch removes that member and instead uses Optional<Reloc> in
places where we have a user input that still hasn't been maped to the
default value, which is now clear has no be one of the remaining 3
options.
llvm-svn: 269988
Summary:
Add support to control where files for a distributed backend (the
individual index files and optional imports files) are created.
This is invoked with a new thinlto-prefix-replace option in the gold
plugin and llvm-lto. If specified, expects a string of the form
"oldprefix:newprefix", and instead of generating these files in the
same directory path as the corresponding bitcode file, will use a path
formed by replacing the bitcode file's path prefix matching oldprefix
with newprefix.
Also add a new replace_path_prefix helper to Path.h in libSupport.
Depends on D19636.
Reviewers: joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19644
llvm-svn: 269771
Transition InstrProf and Coverage over to the stricter Error/Expected
interface.
Changes since the initial commit:
- Address undefined-var-template warning.
- Fix error message printing in llvm-profdata.
- Check errors in loadTestingFormat() + annotateAllFunctions().
- Defer error handling in InstrProfIterator to InstrProfReader.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19901
llvm-svn: 269694
Transition InstrProf and Coverage over to the stricter Error/Expected
interface.
Changes since the initial commit:
- Fix error message printing in llvm-profdata.
- Check errors in loadTestingFormat() + annotateAllFunctions().
- Defer error handling in InstrProfIterator to InstrProfReader.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19901
llvm-svn: 269491
Transition InstrProf and Coverage over to the stricter Error/Expected
interface.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19901
llvm-svn: 269462
a sequence of values.
It increments through the values in the half-open range: [Begin, End),
producing those values when indirecting the iterator. It should support
integers, iterators, and any other type providing these basic arithmetic
operations.
This came up in the C++ standards committee meeting, and it seemed like
a useful construct that LLVM might want as well, and I wanted to
understand how easily we could solve it. I suspect this can be used to
write simpler counting loops even in LLVM along the lines of:
for (int i : seq(0, v.size())) {
...
};
As part of this, I had to fix the lack of a proxy object returned from
the operator[] in our iterator facade.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17870
llvm-svn: 269390
Summary:
...loop after the last iteration.
This is really hard to do correctly. The core problem is that we need to
model liveness through the induction PHIs from iteration to iteration in
order to get the correct results, and we need to correctly de-duplicate
the common subgraphs of instructions feeding some subset of the
induction PHIs. All of this can be driven either from a side effect at
some iteration or from the loop values used after the loop finishes.
This patch implements this by storing the forward-propagating analysis
of each instruction in a cache to recall whether it was free and whether
it has become live and thus counted toward the total unroll cost. Then,
at each sink for a value in the loop, we recursively walk back through
every value that feeds the sink, including looping back through the
iterations as needed, until we have marked the entire input graph as
live. Because we cache this, we never visit instructions more than twice
-- once when we analyze them and put them into the cache, and once when
we count their cost towards the unrolled loop. Also, because the cache
is only two bits and because we are dealing with relatively small
iteration counts, we can store all of this very densely in memory to
avoid this from becoming an excessively slow analysis.
The code here is still pretty gross. I would appreciate suggestions
about better ways to factor or split this up, I've stared too long at
the algorithmic side to really have a good sense of what the design
should probably look at.
Also, it might seem like we should do all of this bottom-up, but I think
that is a red herring. Specifically, the simplification power is *much*
greater working top-down. We can forward propagate very effectively,
even across strange and interesting recurrances around the backedge.
Because we use data to propagate, this doesn't cause a state space
explosion. Doing this level of constant folding, etc, would be very
expensive to do bottom-up because it wouldn't be until the last moment
that you could collapse everything. The current solution is essentially
a top-down simplification with a bottom-up cost accounting which seems
to get the best of both worlds. It makes the simplification incremental
and powerful while leaving everything dead until we *know* it is needed.
Finally, a core property of this approach is its *monotonicity*. At all
times, the current UnrolledCost is a conservatively low estimate. This
ensures that we will never early-exit from the analysis due to exceeding
a threshold when if we had continued, the cost would have gone back
below the threshold. These kinds of bugs can cause incredibly hard to
track down random changes to behavior.
We could use a techinque similar (but much simpler) within the inliner
as well to avoid considering speculated code in the inline cost.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: sanjoy, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11758
llvm-svn: 269388
Remove the ModuleLevelChanges argument, and the ability to create new
subprograms for cloned functions. The latter was added without review in
r203662, but it has no in-tree clients (all non-test callers pass false
for ModuleLevelChanges [1], so it isn't reachable outside of tests). It
also isn't clear that adding a duplicate subprogram to the compile unit is
always the right thing to do when cloning a function within a module. If
this functionality comes back it should be accompanied with a more concrete
use case.
Furthermore, all in-tree clients add the returned function to the module.
Since that's pretty much the only sensible thing you can do with the function,
just do that in CloneFunction.
[1] http://llvm-cs.pcc.me.uk/lib/Transforms/Utils/CloneFunction.cpp/rCloneFunction
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18628
llvm-svn: 269110
Add convenience function to create MachineModuleInfo and
MachineFunctionAnalysis passes and add them to a pass manager.
Despite factoring out some shared code in
LiveIntervalTest/LLVMTargetMachine this will be used by my upcoming llc
change.
llvm-svn: 269002
allow the transformation to strip invalid debug info.
This patch separates the Verifier into an analysis and a transformation
pass, with the transformation pass optionally stripping malformed
debug info.
The problem I'm trying to solve with this sequence of patches is that
historically we've done a really bad job at verifying debug info. We want
to be able to make the verifier stricter without having to worry about
breaking bitcode compatibility with existing producers. For example, we
don't necessarily want IR produced by an older version of clang to be
rejected by an LTO link just because of malformed debug info, and rather
provide an option to strip it. Note that merely outdated (but well-formed)
debug info would continue to be auto-upgraded in this scenario.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19988
rdar://problem/25818489
This reapplies r268937 without modifications.
llvm-svn: 268966
allow the transformation to strip invalid debug info.
This patch separates the Verifier into an analysis and a transformation
pass, with the transformation pass optionally stripping malformed
debug info.
The problem I'm trying to solve with this sequence of patches is that
historically we've done a really bad job at verifying debug info. We want
to be able to make the verifier stricter without having to worry about
breaking bitcode compatibility with existing producers. For example, we
don't necessarily want IR produced by an older version of clang to be
rejected by an LTO link just because of malformed debug info, and rather
provide an option to strip it. Note that merely outdated (but well-formed)
debug info would continue to be auto-upgraded in this scenario.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19988
rdar://problem/25818489
llvm-svn: 268937
toString() consumes an Error and returns a string representation of its
contents. This commit also adds a message() method to ErrorInfoBase for
convenience.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19883
llvm-svn: 268465
A loop pass that didn't preserve this entire set of passes wouldn't
play well with other loop passes, since these are generally a basic
requirement to do any interesting transformations to a loop.
Adds a helper to get the set of analyses a loop pass should preserve,
and checks that any loop pass we run satisfies the requirement.
llvm-svn: 268444
We have it for StringRef but not ArrayRef, and ArrayRef has drop_back,
so I see no reason it shouldn't have drop_front. Splitting this out of a
change that I have that will use this funcitonality.
llvm-svn: 268434
Check for success values in the CoverageMappingTest unit test file.
This is part of a series of patches to transition ProfileData over to
the stricter Error/Expected interface.
llvm-svn: 268420
Check for success values in the InstrProfTest unit test file.
This is part of a series of patches to transition ProfileData over to
the stricter Error/Expected interface.
llvm-svn: 268402
This patch fixes two somewhat related bugs in MemorySSA's caching
walker. These bugs were found because D19695 brought up the problem
that we'd have defs cached to themselves, which is incorrect.
The bugs this fixes are:
- We would sometimes skip the nearest clobber of a MemoryAccess, because
we would query our cache for a given potential clobber before
checking if the potential clobber is the clobber we're looking for.
The cache entry for the potential clobber would point to the nearest
clobber *of the potential clobber*, so if that was a cache hit, we'd
ignore the potential clobber entirely.
- There are times (sometimes in DFS, sometimes in the getClobbering...
functions) where we would insert cache entries that say a def
clobbers itself.
There's a bit of common code between the fixes for the bugs, so they
aren't split out into multiple commits.
This patch also adds a few unit tests, and refactors existing tests a
bit to reduce the duplication of setup code.
llvm-svn: 268087
In gcc, \ escapes every character in response files. It is true that this makes
it harder to mention Windows files in rsp files, but not doing this means clang
disagrees with gcc, and also disagrees with the shell (on non-Windows) which
rsp file quoting is supposed to match. clang isn't free to choose what to do
here.
In general, the idea for response files is to take bits of your command line
and write them to a file unchanged, and have things work the same way. Since
the command line would've been interpreted by the shell, things in the rsp file
need to be subject to the same shell quoting rules.
People who want to put Windows-style paths in their response files either need
to do any of:
* escape their backslashes
* or use clang-cl which uses cl.exe/cmd.exe quoting rules
* pass --rsp-quoting=windows to clang to tell it to use
cl.exe/cmd.exe quoting rules for response files.
Fixes PR27464.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19417
llvm-svn: 267556
This replaces use of std::error_code and ErrorOr in the ORC RPC support library
with Error and Expected. This required updating the OrcRemoteTarget API, Client,
and server code, as well as updating the Orc C API.
This patch also fixes several instances where Errors were dropped.
llvm-svn: 267457
If several regions cover the same area of code, we have to restore
the combined value for that area when return from a nested region.
This patch achieves that by combining regions before calling buildSegments.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18610
llvm-svn: 267390
Eliminate DITypeIdentifierMap and make DITypeRef a thin wrapper around
DIType*. It is no longer legal to refer to a DICompositeType by its
'identifier:', and DIBuilder no longer retains all types with an
'identifier:' automatically.
Aside from the bitcode upgrade, this is mainly removing logic to resolve
an MDString-based reference to an actualy DIType. The commits leading
up to this have made the implicit type map in DICompileUnit's
'retainedTypes:' field superfluous.
This does not remove DITypeRef, DIScopeRef, DINodeRef, and
DITypeRefArray, or stop using them in DI-related metadata. Although as
of this commit they aren't serving a useful purpose, there are patchces
under review to reuse them for CodeView support.
The tests in LLVM were updated with deref-typerefs.sh, which is attached
to the thread "[RFC] Lazy-loading of debug info metadata":
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-April/098318.html
llvm-svn: 267296
Each reference to an unresolved MDNode is expensive, since the RAUW
support in MDNode uses a separate allocation and side map. Since
a distinct MDNode doesn't require its operands on creation (unlike
uniuqed nodes, there's no need to check for structural equivalence),
use nullptr for any of its unresolved operands. Besides reducing the
burden on MDNode maps, this can avoid allocating temporary MDNodes in
the first place.
We need some way to track operands. Invent DistinctMDOperandPlaceholder
for this purpose, which is a Metadata subclass that holds an ID and
points at its single user. DistinctMDOperandPlaceholder::replaceUseWith
is just like RAUW, but its name highlights that there is only ever
exactly one use.
There is no support for moving (or, obviously, copying) these. Move
support would be possible but expensive; leaving it unimplemented
prevents user error. In the BitcodeReader I originally considered
allocating on a BumpPtrAllocator and keeping a vector of pointers to
them, and then I realized that std::deque implements exactly this.
A couple of obvious follow-ups:
- Change ValueEnumerator to emit distinct nodes first to take more
advantage of this optimization. (How convenient... I think I might
have a couple of patches for this.)
- Change DIBuilder and its consumers (like CGDebugInfo in clang) to
use something like this when constructing debug info in the first
place.
llvm-svn: 267270
