Move platform independent code (lowering of possibly overwritten
arguments, check for tail call optimization eligibility) from
target X86ISelectionLowering.cpp to TargetLowering.h and
SelectionDAGISel.cpp.
Initial PowerPC tail call implementation:
Support ppc32 implemented and tested (passes my tests and
test-suite llvm-test).
Support ppc64 implemented and half tested (passes my tests).
On ppc tail call optimization is performed if
caller and callee are fastcc
call is a tail call (in tail call position, call followed by ret)
no variable argument lists or byval arguments
option -tailcallopt is enabled
Supported:
* non pic tail calls on linux/darwin
* module-local tail calls on linux(PIC/GOT)/darwin(PIC)
* inter-module tail calls on darwin(PIC)
If constraints are not met a normal call will be emitted.
A test checking the argument lowering behaviour on x86-64 was added.
llvm-svn: 50477
we were checking for it in the wrong order. This caused a miscompilation because the
return slot optimization assumes that the call it is dealing with is NOT a memcpy.
llvm-svn: 50444
We now compile test2/test3 to:
_test2:
## InlineAsm Start
set %xmm0, %xmm1
## InlineAsm End
addps %xmm1, %xmm0
ret
_test3:
## InlineAsm Start
set %xmm0, %xmm1
## InlineAsm End
paddd %xmm1, %xmm0
ret
as expected.
llvm-svn: 50389
towards PR2094. It now compiles the attached .ll file to:
_sad16_sse2:
movslq %ecx, %rax
## InlineAsm Start
%ecx %rdx %rax %rax %r8d %rdx %rsi
## InlineAsm End
## InlineAsm Start
set %eax
## InlineAsm End
ret
which is pretty decent for a 3 output, 4 input asm.
llvm-svn: 50386
e.g.
vr1024<2> extract_subreg vr1025, 2
If vr1024 do not have the same register class as vr1025, it's not safe to coalesce this away. For example, vr1024 might be a GPR32 while vr1025 might be a GPR64.
llvm-svn: 50385
ComputeMaskedBits knows about cttz, ctlz, and ctpop. Teach
SelectionDAG's ComputeMaskedBits what InstCombine's knows
about SRem. And teach them both some things about high bits
in Mul, UDiv, URem, and Sub. This allows instcombine and
dagcombine to eliminate sign-extension operations in
several new cases.
llvm-svn: 50358
When choosing between constraints with multiple options,
like "ir", test to see if we can use the 'i' constraint and
go with that if possible. This produces more optimal ASM in
all cases (sparing a register and an instruction to load it),
and fixes inline asm like this:
void test () {
asm volatile (" %c0 %1 " : : "imr" (42), "imr"(14));
}
Previously we would dump "42" into a memory location (which
is ok for the 'm' constraint) which would cause a problem
because the 'c' modifier is not valid on memory operands.
Isn't it great how inline asm turns 'missed optimization'
into 'compile failed'??
Incidentally, this was the todo in
PowerPC/2007-04-24-InlineAsm-I-Modifier.ll
Please do NOT pull this into Tak.
llvm-svn: 50315
