the loop header has a non-loop predecessor which has been pre-fused into
its chain due to unanalyzable branches. In this case, rotating the
header into the body of the loop in order to place a loop exit at the
bottom of the loop is a Very Bad Idea as it makes the loop
non-contiguous.
I'm working on a good test case for this, but it's a bit annoynig to
craft. I should get one shortly, but I'm submitting this now so I can
begin the (lengthy) performance analysis process. An initial run of LNT
looks really, really good, but there is too much noise there for me to
trust it much.
llvm-svn: 154395
Take this opportunity to generalize the indirectbr bailout logic for
loop transformations. CFG transformations will never get indirectbr
right, and there's no point trying.
llvm-svn: 154386
This is a new algorithm that finds sets of register units that can be
used to model registers pressure. This handles arbitrary, overlapping
register classes. Each register class is associated with a (small)
list of pressure sets. These are the dimensions of pressure affected
by the register class's liveness.
llvm-svn: 154374
This is a new algorithm that associates registers with weighted
register units to accuretely model their effect on register
pressure. This handles registers with multiple overlapping
subregisters. It is possible, but almost inconceivable that the
algorithm fails to find an exact solution for a target description. If
an exact solution cannot be found, an inexact, but reasonable solution
will be chosen.
llvm-svn: 154373
legalizer always use the DAG entry node. This is wrong when the libcall is
emitted as a tail call since it effectively folds the return node. If
the return node's input chain is not the entry (i.e. call, load, or store)
use that as the tail call input chain.
PR12419
rdar://9770785
rdar://11195178
llvm-svn: 154370
in-register, such that we can use a single vector store rather then a
series of scalar stores.
For func_4_8 the generated code
vldr d16, LCPI0_0
vmov d17, r0, r1
vadd.i16 d16, d17, d16
vmov.u16 r0, d16[3]
strb r0, [r2, #3]
vmov.u16 r0, d16[2]
strb r0, [r2, #2]
vmov.u16 r0, d16[1]
strb r0, [r2, #1]
vmov.u16 r0, d16[0]
strb r0, [r2]
bx lr
becomes
vldr d16, LCPI0_0
vmov d17, r0, r1
vadd.i16 d16, d17, d16
vuzp.8 d16, d17
vst1.32 {d16[0]}, [r2, :32]
bx lr
I'm not fond of how this combine pessimizes 2012-03-13-DAGCombineBug.ll,
but I couldn't think of a way to judiciously apply this combine.
This
ldrh r0, [r0, #4]
strh r0, [r1]
becomes
vldr d16, [r0]
vmov.u16 r0, d16[2]
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vuzp.16 d16, d17
vst1.32 {d16[0]}, [r1, :32]
PR11158
rdar://10703339
llvm-svn: 154340
This patch restores TwoAddressInstructionPass's pre-r153892 behaviour when
rescheduling instructions in TryInstructionTransform. Hopefully this will fix
PR12493. To refix PR11861, lowering of INSERT_SUBREGS is deferred until after
the copy that unties the operands is emitted (this seems to be a more
appropriate fix for that issue anyway).
llvm-svn: 154338
A couple of cases where we were accidentally creating constant conditions by
something like "x == a || b" instead of "x == a || x == b". In one case a
conditional & then unreachable was used - I transformed this into a direct
assert instead.
llvm-svn: 154324
x86 addressing modes. This allows PIE-based TLS offsets to fit directly
into an addressing mode immediate offset, which is the last remaining
code quality issue from PR12380. With this patch, that PR is completely
fixed.
To understand why this patch is correct to match these offsets into
addressing mode immediates, break it down by cases:
1) 32-bit is trivially correct, and unmodified here.
2) 64-bit non-small mode is unchanged and never matches.
3) 64-bit small PIC code which is RIP-relative is handled specially in
the match to try to fit RIP into the base register. If it fails, it
now early exits. This behavior is unchanged by the patch.
4) 64-bit small non-PIC code which is not RIP-relative continues to work
as it did before. The reason these immediates are safe is because the
ABI ensures they fit in small mode. This behavior is unchanged.
5) 64-bit small PIC code which is *not* using RIP-relative addressing.
This is the only case changed by the patch, and the primary place you
see it is in TLS, either the win64 section offset TLS or Linux
local-exec TLS model in a PIC compilation. Here the ABI again ensures
that the immediates fit because we are in small mode, and any other
operations required due to the PIC relocation model have been handled
externally to the Wrapper node (extra loads etc are made around the
wrapper node in ISelLowering).
I've tested this as much as I can comparing it with GCC's output, and
everything appears safe. I discussed this with Anton and it made sense
to him at least at face value. That said, if there are issues with PIC
code after this patch, yell and we can revert it.
llvm-svn: 154304
comprehensive testing of TLS codegen for x86. Convert all of the ones
that were still using grep to use FileCheck. Remove some redundancies
between them.
Perhaps most interestingly expand the test cases so that they actually
fully list the instruction snippet being tested. TLS operations are
*very* narrowly defined, and so these seem reasonably stable. More
importantly, the existing test cases already were crazy fine grained,
expecting specific registers to be allocated. This just clarifies that
no *other* instructions are expected, and fills in some crucial gaps
that weren't being tested at all.
This will make any subsequent changes to TLS much more clear during
review.
llvm-svn: 154303
when -ffast-math, i.e. don't just always do it if the reciprocal can
be formed exactly. There is already an IR level transform that does
that, and it does it more carefully.
llvm-svn: 154296
optimizations which are valid for position independent code being linked
into a single executable, but not for such code being linked into
a shared library.
I discussed the design of this with Eric Christopher, and the decision
was to support an optional bit rather than a completely separate
relocation model. Fundamentally, this is still PIC relocation, its just
that certain optimizations are only valid under a PIC relocation model
when the resulting code won't be in a shared library. The simplest path
to here is to expose a single bit option in the TargetOptions. If folks
have different/better designs, I'm all ears. =]
I've included the first optimization based upon this: changing TLS
models to the *Exec models when PIE is enabled. This is the LLVM
component of PR12380 and is all of the hard work.
llvm-svn: 154294
in TargetLowering. There was already a FIXME about this location being
odd. The interface is simplified as a consequence. This will also make
it easier to change TLS models when compiling with PIE.
llvm-svn: 154292
where a chain outside of the loop block-set ended up in the worklist for
scheduling as part of the contiguous loop. However, asserting the first
block in the chain is in the loop-set isn't a valid check -- we may be
forced to drag a chain into the worklist due to one block in the chain
being part of the loop even though the first block is *not* in the loop.
This occurs when we have been forced to form a chain early due to
un-analyzable branches.
No test case here as I have no idea how to even begin reducing one, and
it will be hopelessly fragile. We have to somehow end up with a loop
header of an inner loop which is a successor of a basic block with an
unanalyzable pair of branch instructions. Ow. Self-host triggers it so
it is unlikely it will regress.
This at least gets block placement back to passing selfhost and the test
suite. There are still a lot of slowdown that I don't like coming out of
block placement, although there are now also a lot of speedups. =[ I'm
seeing swings in both directions up to 10%. I'm going to try to find
time to dig into this and see if we can turn this on for 3.1 as it does
a really good job of cleaning up after some loops that degraded with the
inliner changes.
llvm-svn: 154287
GEPs, bit casts, and stores reaching it but no other instructions. These
often show up during the iterative processing of the inliner, SROA, and
DCE. Once we hit this point, we can completely remove the alloca. These
were actually showing up in the final, fully optimized code in a bunch
of inliner tests I've been working on, and notably they show up after
LLVM finishes optimizing away all function calls involved in
hash_combine(a, b).
llvm-svn: 154285
