Going through the Constant methods requires redetermining that the Constant is a ConstantInt and then calling isZero/isOne/isMinusOne.
llvm-svn: 307292
Original Patch and summary by Philip Reames.
RewriteStatepointsForGC tries to rewrite a function in a manner where
the optimizer can't end up using a pointer value after it might have
been relocated by a safepoint. This pass checks the invariant that
RSForGC is supposed to establish and that (if we constructed semantics
correctly) later passes must preserve.
This has been a really useful diagnostic tool when initially developing
the rewriting scheme and has found numerous bugs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D15940
Reviewed by: swaroop.sridhar, mjacob
Subscribers: llvm-commits
llvm-svn: 307112
Summary:
Add an option to prevent diagnostics that do not meet a minimum hotness
threshold from being output. When generating optimization remarks for
large codebases with a ton of cold code paths, this option can be used
to limit the optimization remark output at a reasonable size. Discussion of
this change can be read here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-June/114377.html
Reviewers: anemet, davidxl, hfinkel
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: qcolombet, javed.absar, fhahn, eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34867
llvm-svn: 306912
This is a short-term fix for PR33650 aimed to get the modules build bots green again.
Remove all the places where we use the LLVM_YAML_IS_(FLOW_)?SEQUENCE_VECTOR
macros to try to locally specialize a global template for a global type. That's
not how C++ works.
Instead, we now centrally define how to format vectors of fundamental types and
of string (std::string and StringRef). We use flow formatting for the former
cases, since that's the obvious right thing to do; in the latter case, it's
less clear what the right choice is, but flow formatting is really bad for some
cases (due to very long strings), so we pick block formatting. (Many of the
cases that were using flow formatting for strings are improved by this change.)
Other than the flow -> block formatting change for some vectors of strings,
this should result in no functionality change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34907
Corresponding updates to clang, clang-tools-extra, and lld to follow.
llvm-svn: 306878
Summary:
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D34865.
With the Clang uses of the old spelling having been removed in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34865, get rid of the old "diagnostic hotness"
spellings in favor of the new "diagnostics hotness".
Reviewers: anemet, davidxl
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34866
llvm-svn: 306866
Introduced in -r283004, the PassNameParser sorts Optimization options in
reverse. This is because the commit replaced a compare function with "<"
(which would seemingly be proper based on the name of the comparison function).
The result is the 'true' result is converted to '1', which is inverted.
This patch fixes this by replacing the '<' operator call on StringRef with a
call to the StringRef compare function. It also renames the function to better
reflect its meaning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34831
llvm-svn: 306857
Summary:
To enable profile hotness information in diagnostics output, Clang takes
the option `-fdiagnostics-show-hotness` -- that's "diagnostics", with an
"s" at the end. Clang also defines `CodeGenOptions::DiagnosticsWithHotness`.
LLVM, on the other hand, defines
`LLVMContext::getDiagnosticHotnessRequested` -- that's "diagnostic", not
"diagnostics". It's a small difference, but it's confusing, typo-inducing, and
frustrating.
Add a new method with the spelling "diagnostics", and "deprecate" the
old spelling.
Reviewers: anemet, davidxl
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34864
llvm-svn: 306848
The style guide states that the explicit `inline`
should not be used with inline methods. classof is
very common inline method with a fair amount on
inconsistency:
$ git grep classof ./include | grep inline | wc -l
230
$ git grep classof ./include | grep -v inline | wc -l
257
I chose to target this method rather the larger change
since this method is easily cargo-culted (I did it at
least once). I considered doing the larger change and
removing all occurrences but that would be a much larger
change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33906
llvm-svn: 306731
Summary:
When we have patterns like
loop:
%la = load %ptr, !tbaa
%lba = load %ptr, !tbaa !noalias
AliasSetTracker would previously think that the two types of annotation for
the pointer conflict, dropping both for the purpose of determining alias sets.
That is clearly way too conservative, as the tbaa is still valid whether or
not one of the memory accesses has additional AA metadata. We could go
one step further and attempt to properly merge the AA metadata,
but it's not clear that that would be worth it since that may introduce
additional MD nodes, which may be undesirable since this is merely an
Analysis.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32139
llvm-svn: 306727
Summary:
This patch adds an additional level of verification - it checks parent and sibling properties of a tree. By definition, every tree with these two properties is a dominator tree.
It is possible to run those check by running llvm with `-verify-dom-info=1`.
Bootstrapping clang and building the llvm test suite with this option enabled doesn't yield any errors.
Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, chandlerc
Reviewed By: dberlin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34482
llvm-svn: 306711
I think we only need to make sure the value fits in 64-bits not that bit width is 64-bit.
This helps places that use this for shift amounts since the shift amount needs to be the same bitwidth as the LHS, but can't be larger than the bit width.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34737
llvm-svn: 306577
Summary:
This commit allows matchSelectPattern to recognize clamp of float
arguments in the presence of FMF the same way as already done for
integers.
This case is a little different though. With integers, given the
min/max pattern is recognized, DAGBuilder starts selecting MIN/MAX
"automatically". That is not the case for float, because for them only
full FMINNAN/FMINNUM/FMAXNAN/FMAXNUM ISD nodes exist and they do care
about NaNs. On the other hand, some backends (e.g. X86) have only
FMIN/FMAX nodes that do not care about NaNS and the former NAN/NUM
nodes are illegal thus selection is not happening. So I decided to do
such kind of transformation in IR (InstCombiner) instead of
complicating the logic in the backend.
Reviewers: spatel, jmolloy, majnemer, efriedma, craig.topper
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: hiraditya, javed.absar, n.bozhenov, llvm-commits
Patch by Andrei Elovikov <andrei.elovikov@intel.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33186
llvm-svn: 306525
Not sure why this restriction existed, but it seems like we should support any size Constant here.
The particular pattern in the tests is not the only use of this matcher in the tree. There's one in CodeGenPrepare and one in InstSimplify as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34666
llvm-svn: 306417
This method doesn't do any initializing. It just contains asserts. So renaming to AssertOK makes it consistent with similar instructions in other Instruction classes.
llvm-svn: 306277
Summary:
Turns out creating matchers with combineOr isn't very efficient as we have to build matcher objects for both sides of the OR. Those objects aren't free, the trees usually contain several objects that contain a reference to a Value *, ConstantInt *, APInt * or some such thing. The compiler isn't always willing to inline all the matcher code to get rid of these member variables. Thus we end up loads and stores of these variables.
Using combineOR ends up creating two complete copies of the tree and the associated stores. I believe we're also paying for the opcode check twice.
This patch adds a commutable mode to several of the matcher objects as a bool template parameter that can be used to enable commutable support directly in the match functions of the corresponding objects. This avoids the duplicate object creation and the opcode checks.
This shows about an ~7-8k reduction in the opt binary size on my local build.
Reviewers: spatel, majnemer, davide
Reviewed By: majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34592
llvm-svn: 306226
Summary:
m_CombineOr isn't very efficient. The code using it is also quite verbose.
This patch adds m_Shift and m_BitwiseLogic matchers to make the using code more concise and improve the match efficiency.
Reviewers: spatel, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: davide, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34593
llvm-svn: 306206
Also document the attribute, since "probe-stack" already is.
Reviewed By: majnemer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34528
llvm-svn: 306069
Summary:
These intrinsics aren't used by clang and haven't been for a while.
There's some really terrible codegen in the 32-bit target for avx512bw due to i64 not being legal. But as I said these intrinsics aren't used by clang even before this patch so this codegen reflects our clang behavior today.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, zvi, igorb
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34389
llvm-svn: 306047
Intrinsic already existed for llvm.SI.tbuffer.store
Needed tbuffer.load and also re-implementing the intrinsic as llvm.amdgcn.tbuffer.*
Added CodeGen tests for the 2 new variants added.
Left the original llvm.SI.tbuffer.store implementation to avoid issues with existing code
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, tony-tye, tpr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30687
llvm-svn: 306031
This attribute is used to ensure the guard page is triggered on stack
overflow. Stack frames larger than the guard page size will generate
a call to __probestack to touch each page so the guard page won't
be skipped.
Reviewed By: majnemer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34386
llvm-svn: 305939
Summary:
Background: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/112779.html
This change is to alter the prototype for the atomic memcpy intrinsic. The prototype itself is being changed to more closely resemble the semantics and parameters of the llvm.memcpy intrinsic -- to ease later combination of the llvm.memcpy and atomic memcpy intrinsics. Furthermore, the name of the atomic memcpy intrinsic is being changed to make it clear that it is not a generic atomic memcpy, but specifically a memcpy is unordered atomic.
Reviewers: reames, sanjoy, efriedma
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, anna, llvm-commits, skatkov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33240
llvm-svn: 305558
If a regular LTO module has a summary index, then instead of linking
it into the combined regular LTO module right away, add it to the
combined summary index and associate it with a special module that
represents the combined regular LTO module.
Any such modules are linked during LTO::run(), at which time we use
the results of summary-based dead stripping to control whether to
link prevailing symbols.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33922
llvm-svn: 305482
The current name (addModulePath) and return value
(ModulePathStringTableTy::iterator) is a little confusing. This
API adds a module, not just a path. And the iterator is basically
just an implementation detail of the summary index. Address
both of those issues by renaming to addModule and introducing a
ModuleSummaryIndex::ModuleInfo type that the function returns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34124
llvm-svn: 305422
Summary:
This patch is part of 3 patches that together form a single patch, but must be introduced in stages in order not to break things.
The way that LLVM interprets DW_OP_plus in DIExpression nodes is basically that of the DW_OP_plus_uconst operator since LLVM expects an unsigned constant operand. This unnecessarily restricts the DW_OP_plus operator, preventing it from being used to describe the evaluation of runtime values on the expression stack. These patches try to align the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus with that of the DWARF definition, which pops two elements off the expression stack, performs the operation and pushes the result back on the stack.
This is done in three stages:
• The first patch (LLVM) adds support for DW_OP_plus_uconst.
• The second patch (Clang) contains changes all its uses from DW_OP_plus to DW_OP_plus_uconst.
• The third patch (LLVM) changes the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus to be in line with its DWARF meaning. This patch includes the bitcode upgrade from legacy DIExpressions.
Patch by Sander de Smalen.
Reviewers: echristo, pcc, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: fhahn, javed.absar, aprantl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33894
llvm-svn: 305386
Previously, the matching was done incorrectly for the case where
operands for FCmpInst and SelectInst were in opposite order.
Patch by Andrei Elovikov.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33185
llvm-svn: 305308
This just forwarded to the same signature in User. The version in User is protected so there's no danger of anyone outside of PHINode constructing with the wrong operator new. All PHINodes are created by a static Create function in PHINode.
I believe at one point in history this called User::operator new(s, 0) so it was useful then.
llvm-svn: 305255
User has 3 signatures for operator new today. They take a single size, a size and a number of users, and a size, number of users, and descriptor size.
Historically there used to only be one signature that took size and a number of uses. Long ago derived classes implemented their own versions that took just a size and would call the size and use count version. Then they left an unimplemented signature for the size and use count signature from User. As we moved to C++11 this unimplemented signature because = delete.
Since then operator new has picked up two new signatures for operator new. But when the 3 argument version was added it was never added to the delete list in all of the derived classes where the 2 argument version is deleted. This makes things inconsistent.
I believe once one version of operator new is created in a derived class name hiding will take care of making all of the base class signatures unavailable. So I don't think the deleted lines are needed at all.
This patch removes all of the deletes in cases where there is an override or there is already a delete of another signature (that should trigger name hiding too).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34120
llvm-svn: 305251
